No one could see the moon at the time of the eclipse.
The Solar Eclipse is caused by the Black Sun.
Stop calling the moon the black sun.
It is the moon.
No one could "see" the moon as it was in front of the sun.
This means it was only illuminated by Earthshine.
This is nothing compared to the brightness of the sun which still glows around the edge of the moon.
That is why people can't "see" it.
Instead they see its silhouette.
The fact that people couldn't see it as the moon is a real problem for you.
The moon was out during the day. It was there before and after the eclipse.
So where did it go during the eclipse?
Coincidentally, the "black sun" you keep discussing, only appears during the eclipse.
So the moon vanishes, the black sun appears, the black sun vanishes then the moon appears.
I guess you would be one of the morons that don't realise Clark Kent is Superman.
Did you actually watch the video REtard. ?
I don't know what retard you are talking to, but I watched it.
Have you?
Anyone that does will see what a load of shit your old tired out Heliocentric model is.
Nope. They will just see the same BS lies repeated about it.
Are you capable of providing any kind of rational argument?
I witnessed the eclipse myself in the UK in 1999.
I did not see the moon pass in front of the Sun.
Your picture does not reflect what is observed in reality as such it is false.
Sure, instead of the moon passing in front of the sun you see it magically vanish and be replaced by the black sun, which then magically vanishes to be replaced by the moon.
That sure sounds like the moon passed in front of the sun and you just want to call it the black sun.
Unless you are capable of telling us where the moon was during the eclipse, the rational people will continue to accept that it was in front of the sun and you are simply calling it the black sun.
The Moon is nowhere near the Sun during the Solar Eclipse.
Again, if it isn't, where is it?
Due to its phase, we know it has to be near the sun.
The Black Sun eclipses the Sun during the Solar eclipse as can be seen in the video below.
Nope. We see the moon going in front of the sun.
You just want to call it the black sun.
Apparently this guy doesn't understand simple physics either.
He seems to think if something absorbs light it should act like paper towel absorbing water and quickly get saturated.
Has he never seen a coloured object illuminated by white light at all?
Guess how that works? It reflects a lot of light, but absorbs some.
When will you stop linking to videos filled with such garbage and instead try and provide something rational?
No they just think they saw the Moon because your Heliocentric brethren told them that .
The reality is if they actually thought about it they would realise that it isn't the Moon because the Moon is visible in the day.
No. If they actually thought about it they would realise that for the most part (i.e. ignoring the part lit up by Earth Shine), the amount of the moon visible during the day (assuming it is above the horizon) would shrink as it gets closer and closer to a new moon, eventually becoming nothing at all during a perfect new moon.
So all that would be visible is a very faint moon lit up by Earth shine.
If they thought about it they would also think how objects appear close to a bright object, noting that poorly lit (or dark) objects can be a lot harder to see. A simple example of this is a white piece of paper next to (but not lit up by) a torch at night, which is shining straight at you.
For the most part, you just see the torch, not the paper.
If you take an opaque object so it can't be lit up from the other side, and then start passing it in front of the torch, it will appear to block out the light, just like the moon does in reality.
Fortunately we now have access to the Internet and the truth so we don't have to accept your lies anymore.
You mean access to loads and loads of pure bullshit, so you can happily accept those lies.
Back lit objects only appear black to cameras not the naked eye.
That depends upon how opaque they are, and the various intensities of the light.
I can have a front lit object appear black due to a much brighter light shining on the camera setting the exposure far too low.
If an object is thick enough then it is capable of blocking all the light that tries to go through it, either by scattering it or absorbing it.
If this is correct then the much larger much more reflective earth should of illuminated the Moon with the Sun's reflected light making it possible to see the moon right throughout the day during the eclipse.
Not when it is right next to the eclipse. The range required would be far too great.
You have the massive amount of light from the sun, and a completely pathetic amount from Earth.
The Moon is visible in the day I have seen it roughly 90 degrees away from the Sun.
So when it is still quite lit up.
Now try viewing it 10 degrees from the sun, then 1, then 0.1.
See if you can see it then.
When I witnessed the eclipse in the UK in 1999 I did not see the Moon all day .
You saw its silhouette.
If you didn't see it during the day, you wouldn't have seen it at all, not during day, not during night.
It would have magically vanished for over 24 hours.