1
The Lounge / Re: werepenguin time? WEREPENGUIN TIME!
« on: May 17, 2024, 01:37:01 PM »Hey ask the newbies if they want to play!
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Hey ask the newbies if they want to play!
2
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Origin of All Religions
« on: May 17, 2024, 08:44:52 AM »
Arguing from incredulity is just that, the fact that you think it is so unlikely is like the water in a puddle saying this hole fits me exactly, there must have been a designer.
If you look at our world, evolution works within the bounds of what it there, ergo what evolves fits to the conditions, if the world wasn’t in a goldilocks position something would have killed us and we wouldn’t be talking here, ask the dinosaurs about living on a goldilocks world.
There was no mention of us being civilised other than in the context of learning things that we didn’t know before, often that learning bought people into conflict with the prevailing religion to the detriment of the individual. No state had more control of its peoples and were less tolerant of dissent than those that were run by the existing dominant religion of the times.
And FYI, it’s “arse about face” in the country where the language you are typing was born.
If you look at our world, evolution works within the bounds of what it there, ergo what evolves fits to the conditions, if the world wasn’t in a goldilocks position something would have killed us and we wouldn’t be talking here, ask the dinosaurs about living on a goldilocks world.
There was no mention of us being civilised other than in the context of learning things that we didn’t know before, often that learning bought people into conflict with the prevailing religion to the detriment of the individual. No state had more control of its peoples and were less tolerant of dissent than those that were run by the existing dominant religion of the times.
And FYI, it’s “arse about face” in the country where the language you are typing was born.
3
Technology, Science & Alt Science / Re: What is a woman?
« on: May 17, 2024, 04:35:31 AM »I think it all boils down to the fact that Jacky thinks either men and women are basically the same, with some men a bit taller and stronger than a few women, despite all the evidence otherwise and he himself pointing out the gulf between the Williams sisters and male professionals, or there is a difference but they should just suck it up and get back to the kitchen.
So, it’s either one or the other.
If women and men are built differently, (my view), then competitive competition between them is one sided and to give women who want to compete a division of their own makes sense.
If we are basically the same then he has to explain the Williams conundrum.
Or he does recognize the difference and because he hates women, he uses sexism as a shield to try and exclude them from ever succeeding.
Either way I'll leave him with it.
4
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Origin of All Religions
« on: May 17, 2024, 04:09:41 AM »From my point of view, you have it arse about face (backwards), I don’t believe in a deity because I see no proof that there is one, and no need of one to fit what I see.
Religions were the answer for primitive man of where we came from, science now has better answers, especially as there is the elephant in the room of which god/gods to believe in.
Which is where Pascal fails because if the Hindu’s have it right you are barking up the wrong tree. Never mind the mind-blowing amount of schism and offshoots of Christianity that are sure they know the truth, and all others are heretics.
5
Technology, Science & Alt Science / Re: What is a woman?
« on: May 16, 2024, 06:12:50 AM »FYI, Thomas (hit-man) Hearns , 5 weights, 5 world titles.Heavyweight is very far from the next division from featherweight. Maybe you should have asked a less stupid question. Boxers can and do move up a weight class and compete at the same level for the next season. eg world class boxers who compete internationally in their new class.My bad, but also partly your bad. I asked how long in direct response to your question, and then asked how long it takes to go from featherweight to heavyweight. You just responded with "quite a while".
But do you have an example of a boxer who won a weight division, then went up to the next and won or came close to winning?
6
Technology, Science & Alt Science / Re: What is a woman?
« on: May 16, 2024, 04:27:32 AM »Clearly a nutter.
7
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Origin of All Religions
« on: May 16, 2024, 01:41:29 AM »Quote
“Christianity began as a Cornish mermaid cult.”
Brilliant, I have a Cornish friend who I am always calling a fish fucking, shipwrecking inbred. I’ll add mermaid cultist.
And BB had to comment. As usual he can’t hold an attitude longer than it takes to type it.
On Atheists he posits, “You're afraid of death, and hell by extension.” How in fuck does that makes sense, it is the threat of hell that gets all you godbotherers on their knees begging for forgiveness.
I’m not saying that dying hasn’t in the past been a concern to me, but religions wellspring is the fear of oblivion, and subjection to church control to assuage that fear. When my time comes, I shall hopefully still (metaphorically) be on my feet.
8
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: War
« on: May 16, 2024, 12:51:36 AM »Spacey’s internet history on her death will be exorcised by four Vatican Cardinals and then committed to the sun by NASA.
9
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: War
« on: May 15, 2024, 01:09:12 AM »
While the English language is a beautiful thing, it’s not alone in that. Having visited a dozen or more countries, sitting in coffee houses listening to the locals jabber away is as good as sightseeing, I could listen to Italian women speak all day.
But American English suffers from its inception, when the myriad of races came together in the mass colonisation event that became the birth of modern America, they rightfully defaulted to English, but nuance was lost.
In an effort to understand each other, only the basics (you, me, food, water, my land now) carried over, consequently as a true English speaker, visiting America is like staying in a nursery school taught by drunkards, where the children have been instructed that to get a point over you need only to shout louder, and that refinement is akin to deviance.
But American English suffers from its inception, when the myriad of races came together in the mass colonisation event that became the birth of modern America, they rightfully defaulted to English, but nuance was lost.
In an effort to understand each other, only the basics (you, me, food, water, my land now) carried over, consequently as a true English speaker, visiting America is like staying in a nursery school taught by drunkards, where the children have been instructed that to get a point over you need only to shout louder, and that refinement is akin to deviance.
10
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: taxes don't steal from people, people steal from people
« on: May 14, 2024, 09:09:13 AM »Or was it Mark Twain?
11
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: taxes don't steal from people, people steal from people
« on: May 14, 2024, 09:06:08 AM »Kabooy! Remember what Oscar Wilde said about arguing with stupid people.
12
Flat Earth General / Re: This website is controlled opposition
« on: May 14, 2024, 06:22:06 AM »Technically I am being paid for this as I am doing it on works time now.
But to countenance asking this question is narcissism on behalf of our foil hat wearing brothers.
Like the FBI, MI5 or the MMA are even aware of this place and its paranoid denizens and any of you would register as people of interest, even less worth harvesting, as your fat ladened blood and atrophied organs are not worth the rituals involved.
Just hope their lizard eyes never focus on you, no glorious death that, just mind scoured and dumped on the streets to scratch and mingle with the others.
13
Flat Earth General / Re: to day solar storm
« on: May 14, 2024, 03:31:18 AM »
So BB, you didn't answer me, how come scientist knew it was coming but nobody from the flats gave us the heads up?
BB?
14
Flat Earth General / Re: to day solar storm
« on: May 13, 2024, 07:40:25 AM »So BB, you didn't answer me, how come scientist knew it was coming but nobody from the flats gave us the heads up?
15
Flat Earth General / Re: to day solar storm
« on: May 13, 2024, 04:32:27 AM »This all highlights a problem with the whole dark ages belief system that BB (above) and his ilk have in a modern world.
We knew this was coming days before it arrived because science.
Depending on their speed, these take between 1 & 5 days to arrive from a sun 93 million miles away, SOHO and DSCOVR at the L1 Lagrange point could plot its arrival and we were waiting.
It probably led to BB’s poor attempt to view this from his excellent position, as if he didn’t see it, he can in time say he looked but it wasn’t there and add this to his denial list.
Hell, even ground based helioscopes can record the sunspots likely to result in a CME, it was down to early sunspot watchers that the 1859 Carrington event was linked to sunspot activity and increased our knowledge of the happenings in our solar system, no god necessary.
17
Flat Earth General / Re: to day solar storm
« on: May 11, 2024, 02:19:11 PM »Leicestershire! Even better on Lundy in the Bristol channel, no light pollution.
Possibly on tonight from 12.00 to 3
19
Flat Earth General / Re: to day solar storm
« on: May 11, 2024, 01:01:55 PM »Last night, the first time I've seen it in the UK
20
Flat Earth General / Re: How have the flat earthers learned so much that is "secret"?
« on: May 10, 2024, 12:51:07 AM »
Much of what is here is a community health scheme, where many of us are trying to alleviate the loneliness and alienation from society that those of a nature where they gravitate towards mental shit, feel, this includes both sides as you can see with the toleration towards Jacky.
There are many lonely people out there with anger towards, and issues with reality, here they can discuss and express themselves.
Why do they have to do it in a serious thread asking a serious question? Because they can't help themselves.
I haven’t been around for as long as Spacey, but long enough to have had this conversation over and over.
The principal driver for most conspiracy theorists seems to be a kind of narcissism, look at BBriefs posts, mix a certainty about god with an exalted view of your own intelligence, don’t question your own side and have an overriding belief that you matter, that at the centre of all things is you and a deity that cares, because outside of that is the yawning abyss of space and eternal nothing.
I have never won a debate, I’ve enjoyed them and maybe some passing person with doubts found something of use, but from gun control to global warming to a god that really gives a fuck, no minds were changed.
Personally I have shifted my views on some things, but only slightly, because I’m right, god told me so.
21
Flat Earth General / Re: How have the flat earthers learned so much that is "secret"?
« on: May 09, 2024, 02:51:24 AM »Much of what is here is a community health scheme, where many of us are trying to alleviate the loneliness and alienation from society that those of a nature where they gravitate towards mental shit, feel, this includes both sides as you can see with the toleration towards Jacky.
There are many lonely people out there with anger towards, and issues with reality, here they can discuss and express themselves.
22
Flat Earth General / Re: How have the flat earthers learned so much that is "secret"?
« on: May 09, 2024, 12:40:27 AM »Hey! Fuck you Smoky.
There’s one Jura and that is it, and “OK” is an insult. I love Spacey to bits but there is no part of me that is Florida woman, she likes poodle rock and tickling fish FFS.
23
Arts & Entertainment / Re: Now Playing
« on: May 08, 2024, 02:21:55 PM »For Spacey, incase she thought Thin Lizzy was only whiskey in the Jar and the boys are back, Celtic blues.
24
Flat Earth General / Re: How have the flat earthers learned so much that is "secret"?
« on: May 08, 2024, 03:57:19 AM »I am a Tech-Priest of the Liberal Science Division of the new world order, and I have a complaint.
Our evil plan to take over America and the free world by Darwinism and windfarms is being severely hampered by a cabal of internet free speakers who rampage across the interweb spreading the truth that climate change isn’t happening, that fossils are made by Indian stone carving farms to be distributed and buried the world over by night and that the world is flat.
By not challenging the “scientists of big oil” and their ilk, (because that is capitalism and what would the NWO have to do with that) they ensure these blameless and wonderful companies, who in no way would benefit from the relaxation of anti-pollution laws or the cessation of their
It’s about time these recidivists were rounded up and sent to the FEMA camps and homosexual training centres so they can become good sheeple.
Is it my imagination or is it getting hot in here?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-68921215
25
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: War
« on: May 07, 2024, 02:33:20 AM »UK gives Ukraine green light to use British weapons inside Russia.
This gives Russia the right to allow Russian weapons to be used against Britain by Britain's enemies.
For example, Russia could donate some of its Russian nuclear submarines to the Houthis, and these ships could easily send London to the other side of the doomsday calendar. I condemn David Cameron for risking Jura's life and the whole people living in entire NATO.
1. Russia could have done that already. Nothing is actually stopping them.
2. The Thames isn't that deep. You aren't getting a nuclear sub in there to blow up London.
3. Doesn't Jura live in Austrailia?
Thank you Wise for your concern, if the Houthis come King Arthur will rise with his knights from Glastonbury and defeat them.
Dave this just shows your mind is slipping, the fuck I am an Aussie!
Do I sound like Jacky? A brain baked twisted incell, I may not be a flag waving monarchist harping back to the days of Gloriana, building palisades on the white cliffs of dover, but the blood that courses (albeit a bit sluggishly these days) is blue, infused with tea, alcohol and a sense of mild superiority despite the sun having set long since on an empire built on blood, steam and afternoon tiffin.
26
Arts & Entertainment / Re: Now Playing
« on: May 05, 2024, 02:17:59 PM »A wonderful galloping beat with a redhot brass section.
28
Technology, Science & Alt Science / Re: What is a woman?
« on: May 03, 2024, 07:25:01 AM »I can't be arsed reading through his quote heavy bullshit, but is wako jacko advocating for mixed sex prisons?
Yep!
And that we are man haters because not thinking that putting women in mixed prisons is a good idea, we don’t care what happens to men, despite that prisons here are catagorised to keep the more violent away from the less, (although with our overcrowded system I’m not sure that works too well), it is all sexist and something about race.
Despite that most prisoners in jail for violence/sexual attacks are male, because when you break down the figures as percentages women are overrepresented (as a smaller group) and that the whole of the women’s population is a quarter of that of males jailed for sexual offences alone, they would still be in less danger apparently than left on their own.
29
Technology, Science & Alt Science / Re: What is a woman?
« on: May 03, 2024, 01:19:49 AM »No, the charts aren’t useless, they point to the difference in the type of crimes men and women commit, and I did read it.
The arrests to convictions to prison population suggests that women get 15 % arrests which leads to 26% prosecution and 27% convictions but only 5% to jail is indicative of the severity of the crimes, fiddling your TV license isn’t indictable, nor should it be, Violence, sexual offenses and possession of weapons are a different league.
So a greater amount of women are prosecuted set against their arrest rate but less end up in prison because of the type of crime.
I notice that you didn’t answer the question of why you think women are in less danger if jailed with men considering that men’s top crimes are violence against a person and sexual offenses (98% of those convicted for that offense), it may well be that a higher proportion of the women you meet in prison are of a violent bent but when the section that commit the crimes that threaten you, outnumber you to the extent they would, women would be in greater danger just by the weight of numbers.
30
Flat Earth General / Re: WHY would the government trick us?
« on: May 02, 2024, 12:26:13 PM »
FYI, the Magna Carta was reissued under King Henry III in 1216, 1217 and 1225. Under Edward I the reissue of 1225 became law, when it was copied on to the statute roll in 1297. Three clauses of the 1225 Magna Carta still stand as part of English law. These three clauses originally formed four clauses of the 1215 Magna Carta.