Density is why things fall, wow that was hard.
No. It isn't.
Density is a relation between mass and volume.
It does not make things fall.
If you wish to assert it does, explain how or why.
Can you do that?
What causes this dense object to move in a particle direction?
That's all you got for magical gravity, an equation and theory, but no physical proof. Time to move on.
No, we have physical proof, proof which you ignore and dismiss.
You are the one with magic gravity which doesn't even have equation or theory to even start looking for proof.
Lol things do not fall at the same rate in a vacuum, it's not hard to slow down these vacuum chamber tests and see often times that one object indeed falls faster. Even in this
In a perfect vacuum they will. As soon as there is some air it can provide air resistance and slow objects down.
But that doesn't happen in this one. You see them falling at the same rate.
Go ahead and instead source NASA's obvious scripted and non-constant streaming (doctored) video of it.
Care to back up that baseless claim?
Not to mention the vacuum tests suck, they can't really hope to simulate space considering its infinitely expanding and has no container, or so they say.
They can simulate some aspects of space, not all.
Why does density behave like that in "zero-g"? Really? Can you not observe anything? Why does the guy start floating amidst the less dense air against his own will? The answer is already there in the video. Again go away. Where are all these more intelligent and patient people you spoke of?
It behaves like that because everything is falling at the same rate.
Remember, you are the one that needs to provide the explanation.
Why do they fall at the same rate instead of based upon their density?
Why do denser things end up at the bottom?
Why is the bottom the bottom?
How do we know they didn't switch out the bowling ball for a lighter copy? We don't because it wasn't a constant streamed video. It was scripted nonsense.
No, it wasn't scripted nonsense. Yes, it was scripted to some extent, but to show reality, reality you feel a need to hide from.
The easy way to tell is to watch what actually happens.
Notice how the feathers fall in the air filled chamber?
The individual barbs flick up due to the air resistance, and the feathers start tumbling, going sideways instead of falling straight down and just landing.
Now notice how they act in the vacuum example?
They still twitch a bit due to some vibrations and release of tension in the feather, but then they fall straight down, and when they hit the box, they bounce.
Notice what happens with the bowling ball? Basically the same in each, including smashing the box at the bottom.
So I think it is pretty safe to say they haven't done any switch.
The feathers lagging behind is clearly slower, who are you kidding?
Also I don't know, considering gravity is fake and you've yet to prove it, the variables are unknown. It's not cancelling gravity like you hope to claim that's for sure.
No, they are not clearly slower. Go measure yourself.
No, gravity is not fake. But thanks for admitting you have no explanation.
On Earth (or nearby) everything will accelerate at the same rate due to gravity (excluding external influences). This means if you have the plane accelerate at that rate, everything inside will be falling at the same rate, in free fall conditions.
The plane is falling to cancel the effects of gravity.
The force acting upon the various substances match that required for their acceleration.
When it isn't at free fall then the force from gravity no longer matches that for their acceleration and instead you have a reaction force pushing the object up.
When you have 2 immiscible fluids, you effectively have a see-saw situation. Both fluids are being pulled down by gravity and trying to push the other one up (which would be required to displace it and move into the position it had).
The denser object has a greater force per unit volume and thus is capable of overcoming the force of gravity pulling the less dense object down, resulting in the denser fluid moving down and pushing the less dense fluid up.
It works fine with gravity
No it looks like all you did was give what I didn't ask for, stupid equations that seem to work for your stupid theory.
That is exactly what real scientists do. They make models, quantitative models, and then test their predictive capability.
They make up equations and see if they hold.
What they don't do is the crap you are pulling, claiming things fall because density, which makes no sense at all.
it would be much easier to prove physically, thus there would be 1,000's of experiments proving gravity
It is easy to prove. It has been proven, with numerous experiments.
Do you have a single experiment which indicates it is magic density?
or that one piss poor Cavendish one where they assume the motion was caused by gravity and disregarded the other large bodies of mass around the test.
You mean good ones like Cavendish, which eliminates other possible sources meaning it must be gravity or something else based upon the mass, and ignore the much more distant masses elsewhere?
How many times do I have to tell you to go away? Your not helping.
It doesn't matter how many times you tell people to go away. That wont stop them from pointing out all your bullshit.