Osama Bin Laden
Wow, you must really be buthurt.
Thanks for once again showing just how much an abhorrent human being you are.
Should I start changing your name again?
Or will you try to grow up for once?
No. The important thing here is your dishonest double standard
Yet you cannot demonstrate nor explain just what double standard that is.
Instead you can only be upset that your dishonest BS is exposed, so you cry and deflect and act like a child.
Truly pathetic.
I take into account all data that are compatible with each other.
All the data is compatible. But it shows your delusional fantasy is BS.
To say otherwise is to claim that loads of the data that you are using is not compatible, which means you shouldn't be accepting it.
This is your point, and you are not a FE'r actually. If you think so, but you are not.
Why would I be a FEer?
I have never claimed to be one.
Do you really understand me? All measures in the middle earth are harmonious and accepted in both the sphere and the flat earth model.
And likewise, all measurements in the north are harmonious and accepted in both the sphere and the south pole centred FE model. There is nothing to discuss about them. Except for your extraordinary double standard and hypocrisy.
As I said before, there is no discussion about this place.
The problem is that you saying it doesn't magically make it true.
You talk about scientific ethics when you argue with your orchestra friends, that is, globalists with low IQ, but when the subject starts to argue with me, you don't have a trace of scientific ethics. Because you are dishonest with extraordinary double standart and dishonesty.
No, that is just showing your own double standard yet again.
When I object to the BS of other REers, you happily agree with me, because it appears to be supporting your delusional fantasy. But then when I explain why you are wrong, you get upset and object to it, using whatever dishonest BS you can.
I have scientific ethics, you don't.
If you were being scientific you wouldn't be making pathetic demands like demanding a full length flight video for this flight, rejecting it because you don't have one, while accepting plenty of flights which you also don't have one.
Instead you would either demand this of all flights, and only accept the flights which you have found such footage for; or your would accept the plentiful evidence of this flight's existence.