Your explanation is not satisfactory.
There is nothing unsatisfactory about my explanation, at least not to any honest, rational, intelligent person.
If you think there is something wrong with it, quote the part you think is wrong and explain why it is wrong.
Stop just repeating the same refuted BS.
Your nonsense insults people's intelligence.
Nope, that would be yours.
I'm not the one spouting nonsense.
Everyone has seen the waxing crescent moon in the sky in the daytime in direct line of the sun just as the new moon will be in the states tomorrow several hours after midday.
No they haven't. If it was in the direct line of the sun, it would block out the sun resulting in an eclipse. Not everyone has seen that.
Instead what they have seen is the moon close to the sun as a crescent moon, with the crescent getting smaller as it gets closer to the sun, exactly as you would expect for a RE.
If your model was correct and not a deception the whole moon ( full moon )would be illuminated by the Sun's light and as such the full moon would be visable.
No, that would be your deception regarding the HC model, or if the moon was a flat disc (where either it would be entirely illuminated as a circle/ellipse or it would be entirely dark.
In the HC model, as the sun is very far away, 400 times further than the moon (roughly), one hemisphere would be illumined, the hemisphere which faces the sun.
As the moon gets closer and closer to a new moon (i.e. closer and closer to the sun), this hemisphere is pointing more and more away from us (and towards the sun). At a perfect new moon (i.e. solar eclipse), it is facing directly away, and thus the moon is not illuminated (except by reflection from Earth).
So no, if the HC model was correct (which it is, at least when discussing just the solar system), then you would only expect a full moon when the moon is on the opposite side of Earth, such that from the moon the sun and Earth are in the same direction.
Everyone can verify for themselves that when the full moon is visible that the light it provides is uniformly consistent on it's entire visible surface which would be impossible if it was a sphere reflecting the sun's light as your heliocentric brethren claim ; it is only possible for a flat disc to reflect light in such a manor and not a sphere that is covered in dust.
Nope. That only applies if it is a specular reflection. It is not, or if the light source is very close to the sphere making the path lengths significantly different
Instead it is diffuse reflection or scattering from distant light so the path length difference is negligible. When a sphere scatters light like that it is uniform in all directions, for example, this styrofoam ball presumably illuminated by sunlight:
https://www.dhresource.com/webp/m/albu_1023834140_00-1.0x0/wholesale-we-have-all-different-sized-styrofoam.jpgWhere even the scattered light from the atmosphere and ground make it difficult to detect the bottom is darker.
The earth on your model is also four times bigger than the sun so when the moon is at it's highest elevation possible at midnight the sun would be illuminating the opposite side of your imaginary Globe.
Only during a perfect alignment, which results in a lunar eclipse.
With imperfect alignment, even only slight, as I showed before, the moon is well out of Earth's shadow.
On your heliocentric model you claim the moon rotates.
And it does.
Everyone can verify for themselves that we only ever see one side of the moon regardless of the time of day or night it is visible.
BULLSHIT!
Everyone can verify for themselves, by taking photos of the moon as the month progresses, that it wobbles.
Regardless, as the moon is in a different position, the only way to see the same side is if it rotates to keep the same side facing us.
So even if they did verify that we always see the same side, they would be verifying that it rotates.
No one has " EVER " seen the alleged dark side of the moon and no one " EVER " will this is because it is a fabrication used to reinforce your Heliocentric deception and it doesn't exist.
Yes they have.
And it isn't the dark side, just the far side.
This video describes how and why the moon is just a luminary.
Put in the effort and provide the argument here, or I will just dismiss as it childish nonsense which you can't even be bothered wasting your time on.
You are no better than old Rab and old Rab is no match for me and you will learn like Rab that debating your old tired worn out heliocentric model with me is pure folly.
Really? Because I seem to be wiping the floor with you, with you just spouting childish crap any intelligent child could refute. So if Rab is better than me, I would hate to image what he does to you.
Mark 4:19
So now resorting to more delusional bullshit?
Your Strange Heliocentric Religion is False.
But you think your strange blood cult of Christianity is true, even though it contradicts itself and reality?