Poll

What is the truth about the 911 attack on the World Trade Center?

Hijacked Planes were flown into the two towers.  Resulting fires caused the collapse.
14 (60.9%)
The planes were CGI and it was controlled demolition
2 (8.7%)
Something other than planes were flown into the twin towers,  missiles drones etc.
2 (8.7%)
The planes were holographic projections from a special satellite, and it was a directed energy weapon
1 (4.3%)
Something else.
3 (13%)
Denspressure
1 (4.3%)

Total Members Voted: 23

Voting closed: March 06, 2017, 10:56:40 PM

911 What is the truth?

  • 6864 Replies
  • 1198843 Views
*

disputeone

  • 28036
  • +112/-112
  • Or should I?
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5310 on: September 20, 2017, 05:12:52 AM »
[youtube][/youtube]

Artists use lies to tell the truth.
OperationMetal.
Why would that be inciting terrorism?  Lorddave was merely describing a type of shop we have here in the US, a bomb-gun shop.  A shop that sells bomb-guns.

*

disputeone

  • 28036
  • +112/-112
  • Or should I?
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5311 on: September 20, 2017, 05:25:45 AM »
[youtube][/youtube]

[youtube][/youtube]

We are the media now.
Expect us.
Why would that be inciting terrorism?  Lorddave was merely describing a type of shop we have here in the US, a bomb-gun shop.  A shop that sells bomb-guns.

*

Pezevenk

  • 15934
  • +79/-57
  • Militant aporfyrodrakonist
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5312 on: September 20, 2017, 06:32:01 AM »
[youtube][/youtube]

Artists use lies to tell the truth.
OperationMetal.

What does the Sound of Silence have to do with OperationMetal?
Member of the BOTD for Anti Fascism and Racism

It is not a scientific fact, it is a scientific fuck!
-Intikam

Read a bit psicology and stick your imo to where it comes from
-Intikam (again)

*

disputeone

  • 28036
  • +112/-112
  • Or should I?
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5313 on: September 20, 2017, 06:42:55 AM »
What does the Sound of Silence have to do with OperationMetal?

Disturbed is of the metal genre.

Edit. Wikipedia link is bogus.
« Last Edit: September 20, 2017, 06:46:19 AM by disputeone »
Why would that be inciting terrorism?  Lorddave was merely describing a type of shop we have here in the US, a bomb-gun shop.  A shop that sells bomb-guns.

*

Pezevenk

  • 15934
  • +79/-57
  • Militant aporfyrodrakonist
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5314 on: September 20, 2017, 06:43:44 AM »
That's it?
Member of the BOTD for Anti Fascism and Racism

It is not a scientific fact, it is a scientific fuck!
-Intikam

Read a bit psicology and stick your imo to where it comes from
-Intikam (again)

*

disputeone

  • 28036
  • +112/-112
  • Or should I?
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5315 on: September 20, 2017, 06:47:47 AM »
There's heaps more but it would be cheating if I told you.
Why would that be inciting terrorism?  Lorddave was merely describing a type of shop we have here in the US, a bomb-gun shop.  A shop that sells bomb-guns.

*

Pezevenk

  • 15934
  • +79/-57
  • Militant aporfyrodrakonist
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5316 on: September 20, 2017, 06:52:33 AM »
Why?
Member of the BOTD for Anti Fascism and Racism

It is not a scientific fact, it is a scientific fuck!
-Intikam

Read a bit psicology and stick your imo to where it comes from
-Intikam (again)

*

disputeone

  • 28036
  • +112/-112
  • Or should I?
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5317 on: September 20, 2017, 06:54:24 AM »
That's the idea. Do you have anything to add on wtc 7? You're pretty bright I would like your input.
Why would that be inciting terrorism?  Lorddave was merely describing a type of shop we have here in the US, a bomb-gun shop.  A shop that sells bomb-guns.

*

Pezevenk

  • 15934
  • +79/-57
  • Militant aporfyrodrakonist
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5318 on: September 20, 2017, 06:57:04 AM »
I don't get it, "why" is the idea?
Member of the BOTD for Anti Fascism and Racism

It is not a scientific fact, it is a scientific fuck!
-Intikam

Read a bit psicology and stick your imo to where it comes from
-Intikam (again)

*

disputeone

  • 28036
  • +112/-112
  • Or should I?
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5319 on: September 20, 2017, 06:57:32 AM »
Do you have anything to add on wtc 7? You're pretty bright I would like your input.
Why would that be inciting terrorism?  Lorddave was merely describing a type of shop we have here in the US, a bomb-gun shop.  A shop that sells bomb-guns.

*

Pezevenk

  • 15934
  • +79/-57
  • Militant aporfyrodrakonist
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5320 on: September 20, 2017, 07:02:24 AM »
No. I'm not an engineer and I don't know much about it.

Why is it cheating? Cheating for what? I'm kinda confused...
Member of the BOTD for Anti Fascism and Racism

It is not a scientific fact, it is a scientific fuck!
-Intikam

Read a bit psicology and stick your imo to where it comes from
-Intikam (again)

*

disputeone

  • 28036
  • +112/-112
  • Or should I?
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5321 on: September 20, 2017, 07:04:07 AM »
No. I'm not an engineer and I don't know much about it.

That's fine.

Why is it cheating? Cheating for what? I'm kinda confused...

That's the idea, and why Rayzor and his mates can't touch us. Please keep this thread on topic.
Why would that be inciting terrorism?  Lorddave was merely describing a type of shop we have here in the US, a bomb-gun shop.  A shop that sells bomb-guns.

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • +1/-1
  • Extra Racist
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5322 on: September 20, 2017, 08:41:23 AM »
That was a fun read from my last post. Still no evidence presented.

ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

*

DuckDodgers

  • One Duck to Rule Them All
  • 5476
  • +0/-0
  • What's supposed to go here?
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5323 on: September 20, 2017, 10:57:06 AM »
Yes, but even verinage demolition require a deliberate human hand in its involvement. What I mean is that the way the twin towers and WTC7 fell (as in how it looked) have only been seen when people have done something (not talking about smashing planes into the building but meticulous planning)to make it do that. Never because of a fire or natural phenomenon. We are being told to believe the only times this has ever happened was on 9/11 and it happened 3 times and then never again

Can you seriously blame people for questioning?
You can officially stop saying the wtc buildings are the only ones to ever collapse by fire.  There was a 17-story high rise in Iran that collapsed back in January, the Plasco building, which was caused by a fire which started on the 9th floor.
markjo, what force can not pass through a solid or liquid?
Magnetism for one and electric is the other.

*

DuckDodgers

  • One Duck to Rule Them All
  • 5476
  • +0/-0
  • What's supposed to go here?
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5324 on: September 20, 2017, 11:00:12 AM »
Why do you feel the need to prove anything about yourself?   You are starting to sound like BHS.  He's always trying to prove something about himself.

You keep bringing me in the middle...go figure, that says alot.

You mean proving what you say?? Like an honest person would?

Here....just a random pic as we speak...



Can you even do this?? Can you even prove you are real?

We will leave out the blow hard or shill.... Just do step one
It's pretty suspicious that you come in here to post "proof" you are real after Rayzor blatantly stated you are always posting things to prove yourself.  It's almost like he summoned you to do this. Are you shilling with him?
markjo, what force can not pass through a solid or liquid?
Magnetism for one and electric is the other.

*

Crouton

  • Flat Earth Inspector General of High Fashion Crimes and Misdemeanors
  • 17037
  • +5/-4
  • He who walks away from Omelas
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5325 on: September 20, 2017, 11:20:51 AM »
Why do you feel the need to prove anything about yourself?   You are starting to sound like BHS.  He's always trying to prove something about himself.

You keep bringing me in the middle...go figure, that says alot.

You mean proving what you say?? Like an honest person would?

Here....just a random pic as we speak...



Can you even do this?? Can you even prove you are real?

We will leave out the blow hard or shill.... Just do step one

Is that a Cayenne?  How does it compare to Porsche's car offerings?
Intelligentia et magnanimitas vincvnt violentiam et desperationem.
The truth behind NASA's budget

*

Bom Tishop

  • 11247
  • +12/-7
  • Official friend boy of the FES!!
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5326 on: September 20, 2017, 11:40:25 AM »
It's pretty suspicious that you come in here to post "proof" you are real after Rayzor blatantly stated you are always posting things to prove yourself.  It's almost like he summoned you to do this. Are you shilling with him?

I like to irritate the blow hard/possible shill by doing things he cannot...this is just one of many ways to get under his skin.

Is that a Cayenne?  How does it compare to Porsche's car offerings?

Turbo Panamera...it's a good daily driver. It depends what you like as a person. If you are looking for pure luxury and bling bling then go with an s550... however, if you want simplicity, functionality, efficiency and sporty Porsche is a decent option.

I myself am a simplicity and functionality person....I am the person that only has one spoon/knife/bowl/cup/fork etc and rewash every sitting
Quote from: Bom Tishop
LordDave is quite alright even for a bleeding heart liberal. Godspeed good sir

*

Wolvaccine

  • EXTRA SPICY MODE
  • 25833
  • +3/-2
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5327 on: September 20, 2017, 02:49:28 PM »
Yes, but even verinage demolition require a deliberate human hand in its involvement. What I mean is that the way the twin towers and WTC7 fell (as in how it looked) have only been seen when people have done something (not talking about smashing planes into the building but meticulous planning)to make it do that. Never because of a fire or natural phenomenon. We are being told to believe the only times this has ever happened was on 9/11 and it happened 3 times and then never again

Can you seriously blame people for questioning?
You can officially stop saying the wtc buildings are the only ones to ever collapse by fire.  There was a 17-story high rise in Iran that collapsed back in January, the Plasco building, which was caused by a fire which started on the 9th floor.


Perhaps all may not be as it seems here either

http://www.ae911truth.org/images/PDFs/Plasco_Building_Report_2.20.17.pdf


Quote from: sokarul
what website did you use to buy your wife? Did you choose Chinese over Russian because she can't open her eyes to see you?

What animal relates to your wife?

Know your place

*

disputeone

  • 28036
  • +112/-112
  • Or should I?
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5328 on: September 20, 2017, 03:06:48 PM »
Please keep this thread on topic guys.

Rayzor is trying to debunk Newton. Let's talk about that.

Edit. @Rayzor.
You still haven't addressed your post trying to debunk Newton. Do you stand by it?

You seriously think I'm trying to debunk Newton?

I do, yes.

See.
We'll soon see about that.

Yes,  Hulsey's  simultaneous collapse theory.   What a joke.

In order for the building to collapse at free-fall the entire core had to fail nearly simultaneously. Structural resistance slows fall acceleration. If you don't like it take it up with Newton, not me.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Newt.html

Ah, I see where you went wrong,  you forgot that the center had already collapsed / was collapsing BEFORE the facade came down.  I really can't keep holding you hand while you work through these things, you have to start to think for yourself if you are going to be a good anon campaigner.

Thats not true that's the conclusions of the fraudulent NIST report. That is merely the lie we were sold.

Furthermore, even if the entire inner core collapsed leaving the entire "facade" intact (which is impossible because of the cross bracing) there were still 18 support columns around the exterior.



A free fall collapse even under your fairytale conditions is still impossible without a controlled demolition. You are trying to debunk Newton.

Q.E.D.
« Last Edit: September 20, 2017, 03:09:02 PM by disputeone »
Why would that be inciting terrorism?  Lorddave was merely describing a type of shop we have here in the US, a bomb-gun shop.  A shop that sells bomb-guns.

*

disputeone

  • 28036
  • +112/-112
  • Or should I?
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5329 on: September 20, 2017, 03:21:10 PM »
Can anyone help Rayzor debunk Newton and thus defend the 9/11 official story?
Why would that be inciting terrorism?  Lorddave was merely describing a type of shop we have here in the US, a bomb-gun shop.  A shop that sells bomb-guns.

*

Bom Tishop

  • 11247
  • +12/-7
  • Official friend boy of the FES!!
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5330 on: September 20, 2017, 04:17:06 PM »
Perhaps all may not be as it seems here either

http://www.ae911truth.org/images/PDFs/Plasco_Building_Report_2.20.17.pdf


Guess they figured if it worked 3 times in a row here in the states, why not try it once there.

Though I don't know much about this besides the basic design of that building (nothing like the towers or 7)..I will say this, if it is a 9/11 Esq situation, it will be harder to suppress there. They are not nearly as brainwashed, and somehow their government is not as corrupt as ours ??? Which is crazy considering how corrupt their government is.

However​, I doubt it is nearly as complex as our situation was here if it does turn out to be nefarious in nature. More than likely just simple insurance fraud.

The deaths I don't understand though...I saw a video, while the place was on fire they were allowing people to just walk around in the damn place....I mean what the hell is that about? Why not just let it burn and just contain from the outside?? Also, why let people back in when the place is still a blaze??


Can anyone help Rayzor debunk Newton and thus defend the 9/11 official story?

Kinda hard to fight reality...
Quote from: Bom Tishop
LordDave is quite alright even for a bleeding heart liberal. Godspeed good sir

*

disputeone

  • 28036
  • +112/-112
  • Or should I?
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5331 on: September 20, 2017, 05:18:45 PM »
They are not nearly as brainwashed, and somehow their government is not as corrupt as ours Which is crazy considering how corrupt their government is.

Let's do it guys, let's take the power back, rage has been trying to save us since '92, I was only three years old.

Let's take it back. Please, for all of us.
[youtube][/youtube]
#OperationMetal.
« Last Edit: September 20, 2017, 05:20:37 PM by disputeone »
Why would that be inciting terrorism?  Lorddave was merely describing a type of shop we have here in the US, a bomb-gun shop.  A shop that sells bomb-guns.

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • +1/-1
  • Extra Racist
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5332 on: September 20, 2017, 06:23:30 PM »
Remember when you claimed people were at ground zero making payphone calls 7 hours after the twin towers collapsed? And they heard the explosion that took down wtc 7?  Remember that?
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

*

disputeone

  • 28036
  • +112/-112
  • Or should I?
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5333 on: September 20, 2017, 06:37:12 PM »
Remember when you claimed people were at ground zero making payphone calls 7 hours after the twin towers collapsed? And they heard the explosion that took down wtc 7?  Remember that?

I do, yes. You should research what "ground zero" was used to describe exclusively before september 11th 2001.

This one, this explosion the firefighters testified to hearing.

Wtc 7.
[youtube][/youtube]

Wtc 1 and 2.
[youtube][/youtube]

Please honour these brave heros.

Also, can you help Rayzor debunk Newton and save the 9/11 official story? It's looking bleak currently.

Edit. @Rayzor.
You still haven't addressed your post trying to debunk Newton. Do you stand by it?

You seriously think I'm trying to debunk Newton?

I do, yes.

See.
We'll soon see about that.

Yes,  Hulsey's  simultaneous collapse theory.   What a joke.

In order for the building to collapse at free-fall the entire core had to fail nearly simultaneously. Structural resistance slows fall acceleration. If you don't like it take it up with Newton, not me.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Newt.html

Ah, I see where you went wrong,  you forgot that the center had already collapsed / was collapsing BEFORE the facade came down.  I really can't keep holding you hand while you work through these things, you have to start to think for yourself if you are going to be a good anon campaigner.

Thats not true that's the conclusions of the fraudulent NIST report. That is merely the lie we were sold.

Furthermore, even if the entire inner core collapsed leaving the entire "facade" intact (which is impossible because of the cross bracing) there were still 18 support columns around the exterior.



A free fall collapse even under your fairytale conditions is still impossible without a controlled demolition. You are trying to debunk Newton.

Q.E.D.

What about and which of Newtons laws do you disagree with Sockarul?

Please know you're not angry at me. You're angry with the people that did this to you. I am trying to help you help yourself. I don't care who hates me for it.

Typo.
« Last Edit: September 20, 2017, 06:41:17 PM by disputeone »
Why would that be inciting terrorism?  Lorddave was merely describing a type of shop we have here in the US, a bomb-gun shop.  A shop that sells bomb-guns.

*

Bom Tishop

  • 11247
  • +12/-7
  • Official friend boy of the FES!!
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5334 on: September 20, 2017, 07:08:27 PM »
Sockarul?

I hope this was not an accidental typo! That made me laugh hard
Quote from: Bom Tishop
LordDave is quite alright even for a bleeding heart liberal. Godspeed good sir

*

Rayzor

  • 12195
  • +0/-6
  • Looking for Occam
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5335 on: September 20, 2017, 07:16:06 PM »
I myself am a simplicity and functionality person....I am the person that only has one spoon/knife/bowl/cup/fork etc and rewash every sitting

Wow, mealtime must be pretty lonely at your place.  Do you never have visitors?

Mealtimes around here are can be a bit chaotic,  but it's always fun to have family and friends together for a meal.  We take turns cooking and everyone has a specialty.   Tonight is a birthday party and since I'm cooking, I'm going to cook Mexican.  Lots of wine, fajitas and hot chilli.

Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.

*

Rayzor

  • 12195
  • +0/-6
  • Looking for Occam
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5336 on: September 20, 2017, 07:18:15 PM »
A free fall collapse even under your fairytale conditions is still impossible without a controlled demolition. You are trying to debunk Newton.

Ummm..  what about the complete collapse of the building internal structure as seen clearly on video evidence?   Another fail by dipshit.

Newton is my friend. 

Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.

*

disputeone

  • 28036
  • +112/-112
  • Or should I?
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5337 on: September 20, 2017, 07:25:58 PM »
Sockarul?

I hope this was not an accidental typo! That made me laugh hard

It certainly wasn't.

@Rayzor and Sock.
@Rayzor.
You still haven't addressed your post trying to debunk Newton. Do you stand by it?

You seriously think I'm trying to debunk Newton?

I do, yes.

See.
We'll soon see about that.

Yes,  Hulsey's  simultaneous collapse theory.   What a joke.

In order for the building to collapse at free-fall the entire core had to fail nearly simultaneously. Structural resistance slows fall acceleration. If you don't like it take it up with Newton, not me.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Newt.html

Ah, I see where you went wrong,  you forgot that the center had already collapsed / was collapsing BEFORE the facade came down.  I really can't keep holding you hand while you work through these things, you have to start to think for yourself if you are going to be a good anon campaigner.

Thats not true that's the conclusions of the fraudulent NIST report. That is merely the lie we were sold.

Furthermore, even if the entire inner core collapsed leaving the entire "facade" intact (which is impossible because of the cross bracing) there were still 18 support columns around the exterior.



A free fall collapse even under your fairytale conditions is still impossible without a controlled demolition. You are trying to debunk Newton.

Q.E.D.

What about and which of Newtons laws do you disagree with Sockarul?

Please know you're not angry at me. You're angry with the people that did this to you. I am trying to help you help yourself. I don't care who hates me for it.
Why would that be inciting terrorism?  Lorddave was merely describing a type of shop we have here in the US, a bomb-gun shop.  A shop that sells bomb-guns.

*

disputeone

  • 28036
  • +112/-112
  • Or should I?
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5338 on: September 20, 2017, 07:26:59 PM »
A free fall collapse even under your fairytale conditions is still impossible without a controlled demolition. You are trying to debunk Newton.

Ummm..  what about the complete collapse of the building internal structure as seen clearly on video evidence?   Another fail by dipshit.

Newton is my friend.

No he isn't.

Thats not true that's the conclusions of the fraudulent NIST report. That is merely the lie we were sold.

Furthermore, even if the entire inner core collapsed leaving the entire "facade" intact (which is impossible because of the cross bracing) there were still 18 support columns around the exterior.



A free fall collapse even under your fairytale conditions is still impossible without a controlled demolition. You are trying to debunk Newton.

Q.E.D.

« Last Edit: September 20, 2017, 07:29:35 PM by disputeone »
Why would that be inciting terrorism?  Lorddave was merely describing a type of shop we have here in the US, a bomb-gun shop.  A shop that sells bomb-guns.

*

disputeone

  • 28036
  • +112/-112
  • Or should I?
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5339 on: September 20, 2017, 07:28:38 PM »
Repost for visability.

Sockarul?

I hope this was not an accidental typo! That made me laugh hard

It certainly wasn't.

@Rayzor and Sock.
@Rayzor.
You still haven't addressed your post trying to debunk Newton. Do you stand by it?

You seriously think I'm trying to debunk Newton?

I do, yes.

See.
We'll soon see about that.

Yes,  Hulsey's  simultaneous collapse theory.   What a joke.

In order for the building to collapse at free-fall the entire core had to fail nearly simultaneously. Structural resistance slows fall acceleration. If you don't like it take it up with Newton, not me.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Newt.html

Ah, I see where you went wrong,  you forgot that the center had already collapsed / was collapsing BEFORE the facade came down.  I really can't keep holding you hand while you work through these things, you have to start to think for yourself if you are going to be a good anon campaigner.

Thats not true that's the conclusions of the fraudulent NIST report. That is merely the lie we were sold.

Furthermore, even if the entire inner core collapsed leaving the entire "facade" intact (which is impossible because of the cross bracing) there were still 18 support columns around the exterior.



A free fall collapse even under your fairytale conditions is still impossible without a controlled demolition. You are trying to debunk Newton.

Q.E.D.

What about and which of Newtons laws do you disagree with Sockarul?

Please know you're not angry at me. You're angry with the people that did this to you. I am trying to help you help yourself. I don't care who hates me for it.
Why would that be inciting terrorism?  Lorddave was merely describing a type of shop we have here in the US, a bomb-gun shop.  A shop that sells bomb-guns.