Dinosaurs: Made In China

dutchy is living proof that youtube doesn't care who it brainwashes!

YouTube is his shepherd!

Still testing the hazards of the Van Allen Belts (Orion) before they will send men through the VAB

Testing the electronics.  Through the center of the belts where Apollo didn't go but will be necessary for interplanetary trips.

Moondust that covered the astronauts (thick layer) that entered the LM unwanted. Absolutely out of the question and every future ''moon'' design does not allow for such  forms of  negligence. It is not the question what happens, but that it will sabotage delicate equipment onboard.

Only know it is potentially dangerous from the samples they have.  Longer missions will increase the risk.  Is the risk the same for a two day stay with 3 EVAs compared to a 3 month stay with an EVA every day?

All prior hyphotesis in rocket design were no longer needed when they had to go to the moon.
No rocket the size of the Intire State building,

direct ascent method vs lunar orbit rendezvous.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_ascent
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_orbit_rendezvous
https://www.nasa.gov/centers/langley/news/factsheets/Rendezvous.html

 not half a meter concrete to protect the capsule from radiation, but thin allu and MLI instead.

Please show a reference that half a meter of concrete is necessary.  Hoaxies like to quote it but I've never seen it sourced.

Quote from: dutchy on July 14, 2017, 09:02:34 AM

Still testing the hazards of the Van Allen Belts (Orion) before they will send men through the VAB

Testing the electronics.  Through the center of the belts where Apollo didn't go but will be necessary for interplanetary trips.

Quote from: dutchy on July 14, 2017, 09:02:34 AM

Moondust that covered the astronauts (thick layer) that entered the LM unwanted. Absolutely out of the question and every future ''moon'' design does not allow for such  forms of  negligence. It is not the question what happens, but that it will sabotage delicate equipment onboard.

Only know it is potentially dangerous from the samples they have.  Longer missions will increase the risk.  Is the risk the same for a two day stay with 3 EVAs compared to a 3 month stay with an EVA every day?

Quote from: dutchy on July 14, 2017, 09:02:34 AM

All prior hyphotesis in rocket design were no longer needed when they had to go to the moon.
No rocket the size of the Intire State building,

direct ascent method vs lunar orbit rendezvous.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_ascent
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_orbit_rendezvous
https://www.nasa.gov/centers/langley/news/factsheets/Rendezvous.html

Quote from: dutchy on July 14, 2017, 09:02:34 AM

 not half a meter concrete to protect the capsule from radiation, but thin allu and MLI instead.

Please show a reference that half a meter of concrete is necessary.  Hoaxies like to quote it but I've never seen it sourced.

He only parrots what his Great Shepherd YouTube brainwashes him with.....

As for the radiation issue: Good vid here...

And in fact there is no genuine debate.  All points you have made come from willful blindness or ignorance of the technology involved.

I am sorry a have challenged your superiour intellect  ......
Buzz shaked of the thick layer of dust and simply told the equipment inside the LM to keep working ! That is how things were dealt with in the late sixties.
VAB ? Go right through them ! Not that sissy testing that still needs to be done nowadays.
 The  amount of indoctrination with Apollo believers exceeds my expectations.

The fact that you keep coming back the stars in cislunar space is evidence of this.  That has been dealt with but you willfully ignore it.

You did a louzy job. You mean that you explain away Neil's clear and cautious chosen words ( deep black..... as it is in cislunar space...... what's it like in cislunar space ? deep black )
You apologists are so extremely amusing, that you even try to chicken yourself out of this one.
Be a man and take some responsability for good sakes......

Van Allen belt has been dealt with repeatedly, their trajectory basically avoided most of it, but the fact you keep bringing it up shows your own dishonesty.  As you said, all these things have been debunked before but you keep repeating them anyway.

A modern NASA spokesman claims they still have to figure out the hazards of the VAB before putting men through it ( not the delicate equipment arguement please......) and a female astronaut claims that we will go beyond LEO for the first time.
You know i have the youtube proof with the astronauts claiming exactly that , so don't embarrass yourself any further.
It's your own fault, being a NASA apologist is a dead end and you have to clean up their mess all the time by willfully ignoring simple English words and constructs and add another layer so you can explain away absurdities.

dutchy is living proof that youtube doesn't care who it brainwashes!

YouTube is his shepherd!

Do i excite you or something ? You are on my tail like a horny hyena. 

Quote from: Badxtoss on July 14, 2017, 09:11:28 AM

And in fact there is no genuine debate.  All points you have made come from willful blindness or ignorance of the technology involved.

I am sorry a have challenged your superiour intellect  ......
Buzz shaked of the thick layer of dust and simply told the equipment inside the LM to keep working ! That is how things were dealt with in the late sixties.
VAB ? Go right through them ! Not that sissy testing that still needs to be done nowadays.
 The  amount of indoctrination with Apollo believers exceeds my expectations.

Quote

The fact that you keep coming back the stars in cislunar space is evidence of this.  That has been dealt with but you willfully ignore it.

You did an extreme louzy job. You mean that you explain away Neil's clear and cautious chosen words ( deep black..... as it is in cislunar space...... what's it like in cislunar space ? deep black )
You apologists are so extremely amusing, that you even try to chicken yourself out of this one.
Be a man and take some responsability for good sakes......

Quote

Van Allen belt has been dealt with repeatedly, their trajectory basically avoided most of it, but the fact you keep bringing it up shows your own dishonesty.  As you said, all these things have been debunked before but you keep repeating them anyway.

A modern NASA spokesman claims they still have to figure out the hazards of the VAB before putting men through it ( not the delicate equipment arguement please......) and a female astronaut claims that we will go beyond LEO for the first time.
You know i have the youtube proof with the astronauts claiming exactly that , so don't embarrass yourself any further.
It's your own fault, being a NASA apologist is a dead end and you have to clean up there mess all the time by willfully ignoring simple English words and constructs and add another layer so you can explain away absurdities.

I don't know anything about the dust situation so I will let someone else address that. 
Neil was not asked, in the video you provided, about cislunar space you claiming he was is dishonest.  He was asked about the moon.  He said space was a deep black, as it is in cislunar space.  He said all you can see is the sun and the earth, wait for it, FROM THE MOON.  Notice how he adds from the moon?
VAB.  They did have shielding and they chose a trajectory that limited their exposure to it.  That trajectory is not available for interplanetary flights.
Onebigmonkey does a great job of explaining stuff like this on his website.  You should check it out.

Quote from: dutchy on July 14, 2017, 11:28:33 AM

Quote from: Badxtoss on July 14, 2017, 09:11:28 AM

And in fact there is no genuine debate.  All points you have made come from willful blindness or ignorance of the technology involved.

I am sorry a have challenged your superiour intellect  ......
Buzz shaked of the thick layer of dust and simply told the equipment inside the LM to keep working ! That is how things were dealt with in the late sixties.
VAB ? Go right through them ! Not that sissy testing that still needs to be done nowadays.
 The  amount of indoctrination with Apollo believers exceeds my expectations.

Quote

The fact that you keep coming back the stars in cislunar space is evidence of this.  That has been dealt with but you willfully ignore it.

You did an extreme louzy job. You mean that you explain away Neil's clear and cautious chosen words ( deep black..... as it is in cislunar space...... what's it like in cislunar space ? deep black )
You apologists are so extremely amusing, that you even try to chicken yourself out of this one.
Be a man and take some responsability for good sakes......

Quote

Van Allen belt has been dealt with repeatedly, their trajectory basically avoided most of it, but the fact you keep bringing it up shows your own dishonesty.  As you said, all these things have been debunked before but you keep repeating them anyway.

A modern NASA spokesman claims they still have to figure out the hazards of the VAB before putting men through it ( not the delicate equipment arguement please......) and a female astronaut claims that we will go beyond LEO for the first time.
You know i have the youtube proof with the astronauts claiming exactly that , so don't embarrass yourself any further.
It's your own fault, being a NASA apologist is a dead end and you have to clean up there mess all the time by willfully ignoring simple English words and constructs and add another layer so you can explain away absurdities.

I don't know anything about the dust situation so I will let someone else address that. 
Neil was not asked, in the video you provided, about cislunar space you claiming he was is dishonest.  He was asked about the moon.  He said space was a deep black, as it is in cislunar space.  He said all you can see is the sun and the earth, wait for it, FROM THE MOON.  Notice how he adds from the moon?
VAB.  They did have shielding and they chose a trajectory that limited their exposure to it.  That trajectory is not available for interplanetary flights.
Onebigmonkey does a great job of explaining stuff like this on his website.  You should check it out.

Also for you......''monkey'' allready went into ''repair'' mode. But lies are lies !!
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

did he buy himself a corsage? 
Or is that a tomato plant? 

" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

I will be discussing this matter further on the radio. I'll make the links available here. If you won't listen to reason, maybe you will listen to it if its coming from a music box.

Never have I been so amazed at how tightly one will clutched at the notion of dragons. What's next? Fairies?

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2017/08/nodosaur-dinosaur-fossil-study-borealopelta-coloration-science/

“the study relating to the pigmentation and coloration—and, therefore, conclusions about predator-prey relationships—is kind of flooded with issues.”
That's because you made them up. Listen to this tid bit about the artist: 

"The fossil then traveled to the Royal Tyrrell Museum’s preparation lab, where technician Mark Mitchell painstakingly chipped away the surrounding rock—a feat that took him more than 7,000 hours over nearly six years. The skull alone took some eight months to extricate."

Well yes, I suppose I could carve a dinosaur out of rock too given 7,000 hours and the dire realization that there is no real dinosaur in the rock I'm carving.

I will be discussing this matter further on the radio. I'll make the links available here. If you won't listen to reason, maybe you will listen to it if its coming from a music box.

Never have I been so amazed at how tightly one will clutched at the notion of dragons. What's next? Fairies?

Or a flat earth? 

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2017/08/nodosaur-dinosaur-fossil-study-borealopelta-coloration-science/

“the study relating to the pigmentation and coloration—and, therefore, conclusions about predator-prey relationships—is kind of flooded with issues.”
That's because you made them up. Listen to this tid bit about the artist: 

"The fossil then traveled to the Royal Tyrrell Museum’s preparation lab, where technician Mark Mitchell painstakingly chipped away the surrounding rock—a feat that took him more than 7,000 hours over nearly six years. The skull alone took some eight months to extricate."

Well yes, I suppose I could carve a dinosaur out of rock too given 7,000 hours and the dire realization that there is no real dinosaur in the rock I'm carving.

Well, if you were able to carve the front half of a supposed 1.5 ton 6 meter dinosaur out of rock with the level of detail shown in these pictures I'd lift my hat in utter respect. I honestly couldn't if I tried, even if i had decades of time.

Quote from: John Davis on August 15, 2017, 04:23:28 AM

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2017/08/nodosaur-dinosaur-fossil-study-borealopelta-coloration-science/

“the study relating to the pigmentation and coloration—and, therefore, conclusions about predator-prey relationships—is kind of flooded with issues.”
That's because you made them up. Listen to this tid bit about the artist: 

"The fossil then traveled to the Royal Tyrrell Museum’s preparation lab, where technician Mark Mitchell painstakingly chipped away the surrounding rock—a feat that took him more than 7,000 hours over nearly six years. The skull alone took some eight months to extricate."

Well yes, I suppose I could carve a dinosaur out of rock too given 7,000 hours and the dire realization that there is no real dinosaur in the rock I'm carving.

Well, if you were able to carve the front half of a supposed 1.5 ton 6 meter dinosaur out of rock with the level of detail shown in these pictures I'd lift my hat in utter respect. I honestly couldn't if I tried, even if i had decades of time.

Like everything else in the world, I imagine it amounts to practice.

Quote from: John Davis on August 15, 2017, 04:17:44 AM

I will be discussing this matter further on the radio. I'll make the links available here. If you won't listen to reason, maybe you will listen to it if its coming from a music box.

Never have I been so amazed at how tightly one will clutched at the notion of dragons. What's next? Fairies?

Or a flat earth? 

That would actually take some sense!

Quote from: Sentinel on August 15, 2017, 06:02:04 AM

Quote from: John Davis on August 15, 2017, 04:23:28 AM

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2017/08/nodosaur-dinosaur-fossil-study-borealopelta-coloration-science/

“the study relating to the pigmentation and coloration—and, therefore, conclusions about predator-prey relationships—is kind of flooded with issues.”
That's because you made them up. Listen to this tid bit about the artist: 

"The fossil then traveled to the Royal Tyrrell Museum’s preparation lab, where technician Mark Mitchell painstakingly chipped away the surrounding rock—a feat that took him more than 7,000 hours over nearly six years. The skull alone took some eight months to extricate."

Well yes, I suppose I could carve a dinosaur out of rock too given 7,000 hours and the dire realization that there is no real dinosaur in the rock I'm carving.

Well, if you were able to carve the front half of a supposed 1.5 ton 6 meter dinosaur out of rock with the level of detail shown in these pictures I'd lift my hat in utter respect. I honestly couldn't if I tried, even if i had decades of time.

Like everything else in the world, I imagine it amounts to practice.

Quote from: Badxtoss on August 15, 2017, 05:03:06 AM

Quote from: John Davis on August 15, 2017, 04:17:44 AM

I will be discussing this matter further on the radio. I'll make the links available here. If you won't listen to reason, maybe you will listen to it if its coming from a music box.

Never have I been so amazed at how tightly one will clutched at the notion of dragons. What's next? Fairies?

Or a flat earth? 

That would actually take some sense!

There is more evidence for dragons and fairies than a flat earth.

I was recently interviewed due to my skepticism towards those silly dinodragons.

https://www.samanthascarlette.com/single-post/2017/08/23/BLACKOUT-Alien-Abduction-Dino-Hoax

Bottom line dinosaurs were real and no hoax! I know from first hand experience. I have been on fossil hunting trips with boyscouts when I was a kid then a few times later on with a friend that does it for a living. I have found a few dino bones myself along with a few fish and plants. I know for a fact they were not placed there and were in the rock or ground a very,very long time.

Bottom line dinosaurs were real and no hoax! I know from first hand experience. I have been on fossil hunting trips with boyscouts when I was a kid then a few times later on with a friend that does it for a living. I have found a few dino bones myself along with a few fish and plants. I know for a fact they were not placed there and were in the rock or ground a very,very long time.

The problem is the deniers are not interested in facts nor the truth.

http://www.nhm.ac.uk/visit/galleries-and-museum-map/fossils-from-britain.html
http://www.nhm.ac.uk/our-science/collections/palaeontology-collections.html

The natural history museum in London has just under a million specimens from a wide range of creatures that once lived on this planet. And that is only one museum, there are many hundreds of museums across the globe that have similar collections.
I find it baffling that some people such as John Davis has the gall to describe these many millions of specimens to all be fake and made in China.

It's just another crazy unsupported claim made by the person who believes moon light is dangerous and penguins were created in some dastardly experiment post WW2.  How can anyone who expresses such views be taken seriously?

Samantha Scarlette....!! now that's a real reliable source!!! are you serious?

Bottom line dinosaurs were real and no hoax! I know from first hand experience. I have been on fossil hunting trips with boyscouts when I was a kid then a few times later on with a friend that does it for a living. I have found a few dino bones myself along with a few fish and plants. I know for a fact they were not placed there and were in the rock or ground a very,very long time.

How did you verify that these Dinosaur bones you speak of were 300 million years old.

How did you verify that the said bones belong to a animal you have never observed .

Your Strange Heliocentric Religion is False.

I was recently interviewed due to my skepticism towards those silly dinodragons.

https://www.samanthascarlette.com/single-post/2017/08/23/BLACKOUT-Alien-Abduction-Dino-Hoax

Oh, and what would you have said if they had asked you this question?

OK, let's be clear here... say a member of the public finds a big skeleton that is the shape of a dinosaur buried in rocks in the ground, you're saying it's not a dinosaur? Since that couldn't have been faked in China then what exactly IS that thing the person found?

Because more than a year later, you still refuse to answer it.

Quote from: GRIZZ420 on September 01, 2017, 10:11:59 AM

Bottom line dinosaurs were real and no hoax! I know from first hand experience. I have been on fossil hunting trips with boyscouts when I was a kid then a few times later on with a friend that does it for a living. I have found a few dino bones myself along with a few fish and plants. I know for a fact they were not placed there and were in the rock or ground a very,very long time.

How did you verify that these Dinosaur bones you speak of were 300 million years old.

How did you verify that the said bones belong to a animal you have never observed .

Your Strange Heliocentric Religion is False.

Retards are fertile you are just a FE troll and the only answer you deserve is, because of science!
It doesnt matter what proven method of identifying them was used because you would just deny the facts and reality. deny! deny! deny! deny! deny!...... did I mention deny?!!!!!!


 

Bottom line dinosaurs were real and no hoax! I know from first hand experience. I have been on fossil hunting trips with boyscouts when I was a kid then a few times later on with a friend that does it for a living. I have found a few dino bones myself along with a few fish and plants. I know for a fact they were not placed there and were in the rock or ground a very,very long time.

That would not be first hand experience. And no one denied that fossils exist. I'm sure you found some.

On the other hand, even if I did believe in dinosaurs, I would be hesitant to believe you found a dinosaur bone on a boyscout trip. And if you did, that it was indeed a 'dinosaur bone' 'in the rock or ground a very very long time.' and that they were 'not placed.' It sounds like you are not interested in facts, but rather would like to believe what you believe without evidence that it was there for a very very long time and not placed there and indeed a dinosaur bone.

Quote from: GRIZZ420 on September 01, 2017, 10:11:59 AM

Bottom line dinosaurs were real and no hoax! I know from first hand experience. I have been on fossil hunting trips with boyscouts when I was a kid then a few times later on with a friend that does it for a living. I have found a few dino bones myself along with a few fish and plants. I know for a fact they were not placed there and were in the rock or ground a very,very long time.

The problem is the deniers are not interested in facts nor the truth.

http://www.nhm.ac.uk/visit/galleries-and-museum-map/fossils-from-britain.html
http://www.nhm.ac.uk/our-science/collections/palaeontology-collections.html

The natural history museum in London has just under a million specimens from a wide range of creatures that once lived on this planet. And that is only one museum, there are many hundreds of museums across the globe that have similar collections.
I find it baffling that some people such as John Davis has the gall to describe these many millions of specimens to all be fake and made in China.

It's just another crazy unsupported claim made by the person who believes moon light is dangerous and penguins were created in some dastardly experiment post WW2.  How can anyone who expresses such views be taken seriously?

Samantha Scarlette....!! now that's a real reliable source!!! are you serious?

I did not make the claim. Eric Dubay did. And it is supported. You can find the support in this thread and in my interview.

All you have to defend your position are attacks against me! How ridiculous, and what a strange religion you hold which has dragons, magical swirling globes, and other like nonsense.

Quote from: John Davis on September 01, 2017, 09:27:31 AM

I was recently interviewed due to my skepticism towards those silly dinodragons.

https://www.samanthascarlette.com/single-post/2017/08/23/BLACKOUT-Alien-Abduction-Dino-Hoax

Oh, and what would you have said if they had asked you this question?

Quote from: Dinosaur Neil on May 15, 2016, 03:59:00 PM

OK, let's be clear here... say a member of the public finds a big skeleton that is the shape of a dinosaur buried in rocks in the ground, you're saying it's not a dinosaur? Since that couldn't have been faked in China then what exactly IS that thing the person found?

Because more than a year later, you still refuse to answer it.

A member of the public eh? Like what happened with the piltdown raptor?

Quote from: Resistance.is.Futile on September 01, 2017, 11:29:56 AM

Quote from: GRIZZ420 on September 01, 2017, 10:11:59 AM

Bottom line dinosaurs were real and no hoax! I know from first hand experience. I have been on fossil hunting trips with boyscouts when I was a kid then a few times later on with a friend that does it for a living. I have found a few dino bones myself along with a few fish and plants. I know for a fact they were not placed there and were in the rock or ground a very,very long time.

How did you verify that these Dinosaur bones you speak of were 300 million years old.

How did you verify that the said bones belong to a animal you have never observed .

Your Strange Heliocentric Religion is False.

Retards are fertile you are just a FE troll and the only answer you deserve is, because of science!
It doesnt matter what proven method of identifying them was used because you would just deny the facts and reality. deny! deny! deny! deny! deny!...... did I mention deny?!!!!!!


 

How could the method be proven without time travel?

Quote from: GRIZZ420 on September 01, 2017, 10:11:59 AM

Bottom line dinosaurs were real and no hoax! I know from first hand experience. I have been on fossil hunting trips with boyscouts when I was a kid then a few times later on with a friend that does it for a living. I have found a few dino bones myself along with a few fish and plants. I know for a fact they were not placed there and were in the rock or ground a very,very long time.

How did you verify that these Dinosaur bones you speak of were 300 million years old.

How did you verify that the said bones belong to a animal you have never observed .

Your Strange Heliocentric Religion is False.

Magic

We used Magic!

Quote from: GRIZZ420 on September 01, 2017, 10:11:59 AM

Bottom line dinosaurs were real and no hoax! I know from first hand experience. I have been on fossil hunting trips with boyscouts when I was a kid then a few times later on with a friend that does it for a living. I have found a few dino bones myself along with a few fish and plants. I know for a fact they were not placed there and were in the rock or ground a very,very long time.

The problem is the deniers are not interested in facts nor the truth.

http://www.nhm.ac.uk/visit/galleries-and-museum-map/fossils-from-britain.html
http://www.nhm.ac.uk/our-science/collections/palaeontology-collections.html

The natural history museum in London has just under a million specimens from a wide range of creatures that once lived on this planet. And that is only one museum, there are many hundreds of museums across the globe that have similar collections.
I find it baffling that some people such as John Davis has the gall to describe these many millions of specimens to all be fake and made in China.

It's just another crazy unsupported claim made by the person who believes moon light is dangerous and penguins were created in some dastardly experiment post WW2.  How can anyone who expresses such views be taken seriously?

Samantha Scarlette....!! now that's a real reliable source!!! are you serious?

Also, Samantha Scarlette is not a source for this; she is who interviewed me.

Quote from: Resistance.is.Futile on September 01, 2017, 11:29:56 AM

Quote from: GRIZZ420 on September 01, 2017, 10:11:59 AM

Bottom line dinosaurs were real and no hoax! I know from first hand experience. I have been on fossil hunting trips with boyscouts when I was a kid then a few times later on with a friend that does it for a living. I have found a few dino bones myself along with a few fish and plants. I know for a fact they were not placed there and were in the rock or ground a very,very long time.

How did you verify that these Dinosaur bones you speak of were 300 million years old.

How did you verify that the said bones belong to a animal you have never observed .

Your Strange Heliocentric Religion is False.

Magic

We used Magic!

Refreshing to see a glober state it plainly.

Quote from: Here to laugh at you on September 01, 2017, 01:40:59 PM

Quote from: Resistance.is.Futile on September 01, 2017, 11:29:56 AM

Quote from: GRIZZ420 on September 01, 2017, 10:11:59 AM

Bottom line dinosaurs were real and no hoax! I know from first hand experience. I have been on fossil hunting trips with boyscouts when I was a kid then a few times later on with a friend that does it for a living. I have found a few dino bones myself along with a few fish and plants. I know for a fact they were not placed there and were in the rock or ground a very,very long time.

How did you verify that these Dinosaur bones you speak of were 300 million years old.

How did you verify that the said bones belong to a animal you have never observed .

Your Strange Heliocentric Religion is False.

Magic

We used Magic!

Refreshing to see a glober state it plainly.

Well, since I was replying to a complete dumbass, (or a really bad troll), I used language he could easily understand.

He certainly wouldn't understand science.

I'd wager the majority of scientists and academics don't understand science. Why ask a bird about ornithology?

I'd wager the majority of scientists and academics don't understand science. Why ask a bird about ornithology?

And you do?

But wouldn't the appropriate question be, Why ask an ornithologist about birds?

I'd wager the majority of scientists and academics don't understand science. Why ask a bird about ornithology?

Can you define science? And others may start worry about your mental health when you want to go and ask from birds about ornithoology. That means you go and start to talk to birds and wait for them to answer.

I'd wager the majority of scientists and academics don't understand science. Why ask a bird about ornithology?

Quite the stupidest thing I've read for a long time.

On the subject of dinosaurs I thoroughly recommend a visit here...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dinosaur_National_Monument

.... where in the Quarry building near Vernal UT you can see hundreds of fossilised dinosaur skeletons still in the rock. I was there a couple of weeks ago. Awesome place. The real thing is so much more beautiful and awe inspiring than your made up bollocks. FFS wake up.