Hm, my tanker design was approved by the IMO incl. USA 1997 but after approval US informed that tankers using such design would not be permitted to enter US ports. Reason is that US has its own laws, OPA90, that only allows inferior tanker designs to enter US ports. You follow? US has its own laws that are not in accordance with international laws. According that law (OPA90) alternative designs shall nevertheless be checked, etc, etc, but the USCG or National Academy of Science, bla, bla, will not do it.
Why would I lie about it? Or the M/S Estonia disaster? Or a-bombs or 911 collapses or US manned Moon trips. I just study the available info and find it not convincing. My website http://heiwaco.com is very popular.
Therefore my Challenges are great successes! Nobody wins them because they are hard to win. Money is evidently available. Why would I lie about that? I am rich and living in a luxurious appartment of my own with a nice view of the Mediterranean Sea. Only silly fools at this forum suffering from cognitive dissonance cannot understand it ... after >5000 posts. Sad. It is time to close the discussion.
Why would you lie about what different officials say?
You state that NASA officials say space travel is easy when they stated in the source you provided that it is the most difficult and dangerous endeavors mankind has ever done.
You say they do not mention previous manned missions when they do. Like when they said, "this is not just foot steps and planting a flag". They mention missions that involved men orbiting the earth.
You claim they say re-entry is easy when it is considered one of or the most dangerous phase of a mission.
Why did you deny people ever calculating propellant use? When some people did the calculations for you and posted them.
So you see you make claims that are easily proven false. So you demonstrate you are willing to lie to yourself and others. Why you do it? You put a warning on your site that just might answer that question.
You have proven you are dishonest just with what I mentioned above. Which brings me to ask why should a reasonable person just accept your word for it?
Show us we are wrong. Post some evidence you do not live in subsidized housing or you have the assets to pay if someone wins.
Like I said all the evidence available to us suggest you are willing to lie and you can not afford to pay.
By the way your design is not allowed in US ports because it fails to met the zero emission required by law. I am also not sure it would be widely used simply because of cost, complexity and amount of hold space lost. There is also one of the reasons the USCG did not support your design. In the most likely situations and statistically the most common your design is not superior. If you do not understand that as an engineer you should spend some time considering cost, complexity vs. benefits.
Until further evidence is supplied to the contrary I will believe the below:
Your expectations for your career fell short. You felt your design would be received with accolades and widely used making you wealthy. Your ego would not allow you to accept reality so you needed to make yourself feel superior and important in the grand scheme of things.
You started questioning things from your peers. Like their conclusions after investigating accidents. Calling them wrong and not viewing them as capable as yourself. You alone understanding the truth and what actually happened. You need them to be wrong.
You need to believe you are more important and influential than you are. That is why you need to and have others believe the US government sentenced you to death. It makes up for your belief you do not want to accept. You believe you are a failure, your ego just will not allow you to accept it.
Along with the above you need people to believe you are wealthy. Evidence available suggest you are not. You are unwilling to admit that you are just like a lot of other people. Needing assistance to afford housing, food and other necessities.
You fail to provide a project or client list for your company. Many companies do to lure other clients and instill confidence in their capabilities. Why did you opt not to list past projects?
On your "very professional" company website you feel the need to state something like this,"I am very good looking, funny, smart" or what ever you actually put. You also felt the need to make the font larger than you used for other parts and put it in bold. This is on the page where you are listing qualifications to potential clients. This is narcissistic behavior. It supports my conclusions about you.
You, the judge of the challenge, has already stated no one can win. This means the judge is biased and has already ruled prior to receiving any application.
I will continue to ensure to point things out like the above. On the off chance someone takes your challenge seriously I want to give them a chance to realize they will be wasting a lot of time and effort.