oh no communists! 
As for the rest of your drivel I don't care. I got your analogy, I was appalled at how poorly constructed it was. It had no real parallel to the current situation. It was more forced that your girlfriends last orgasm.
I really don't understand where you are going with this, you don't care if gays are married because it'd mean nothing, but you don't want them "married" by a judge is the only distinction your idea has made.
History has plenty of meaning to me. I just simply know history extends more than 6,000 years and includes places with different beliefs than me.
You didnt get it, quit acting like you did.
I dont have a girlfriend I have a wife. Nice assumption though. You sure prove yourself to be one hell of a hypocrite dont you.
And where did I say I dont want homosexuals "married" by a judge? All I have said is that they can get a civil union license from a judge, just not a marriage license. Same with hetero's.
And you dont know that history extends more than 6000 years. You have know proof of that. All you have is a bunch of biological assumptions. I am not saying that the earth is only 6000 years old, I really dont know. But we can only know actual history from the start of the written word. Everything else is just speculation without an actual observation.
Socrates proves to be correct again. Man that guy was sexy (not in a homosexual way)
lol i did get it. I actually made no assumption, i used girlfriend in the sense of a girl that is your friend. If you aren't friends with your wife I'm sorry for that.
I know you didn't say you don't want homosexuals "married by a judge" but if you total up the changes you made, that would be the only result, the only real change in what is happening.
That analogy really does suck though, homosexuals aren't trying to claim they are straight, they are trying to marry the person they love. A better analogy would be if you tried to celebrate quanza. Which you could link because it is a cultural thing, and you would be trying to put yourself into a culture you don't belong.
OH my
I know for a fact you did not get my point. My analogy was not that of a homosexual claiming to be straight. It was that of a homosexual claiming to be "married" even though my religious definition of marriage is that between a man and a woman. It offense to us. Now do you finally get it or do you want to keep assuming you do when you dont?
And please dont tell me you meant girl friend as an actual friend. That would make no sense in the context you tried to use it.
Whatever. Im done. There is nothing to be gained by this discussion.
I got what you meant. Marriage isn't the same as race, it is an institution not a set of genes. Hence horrible analogy.
Again, marriage is not the domain of christianity. Get that through your head. It existed before, it existed outside of it, and it will exist after it if christianity ever dies out.
You can't have sex with a friend?
Poll