On a Globe and about the same time, one should see see it before twilight and the other, after twilight. But they have to wait 12 hours because Earth is a Plane.
No, on a globe, due to the daylight, you don't see it during the day.
They can observe the apparent rotation about the south celestial pole to see that it isn't just rotating into position above a disk.
Why does the south celestial pole remain due south?
2. Rolling hills exist because there is no force pulling to center of Earth to shape hills into a sphere.
There is no magical force pulling anything into any particular shape.
For a RE, gravity pulls down towards the centre. That will not magically make things into a perfect sphere. Instead it will result in very large objects breaking due to the pressure at the base pushing outwards, or less solid objects rolling down a hill due to the normal force.
The same applies to a flat Earth, as pointed out and ignored by you repeatedly.
If gravity pulling towards the centre of Earth made hills impossible for a RE, whatever magic you use to replace gravity to explain why things fall would make hills impossible for a FE.
There is nothing intellectual about a Big Bang theory.
You not liking something doesn't mean there is nothing intellectual about it.
Regardless, this is meant to be about the shape of Earth. There is nothing intellectual about a flat earth. All the evidence indicates Earth is round.
6. Time-laps photos are better and prove the Globe Community wrong. We can’t help they rationalize, ignore and even deny it because it doesn't fit in with the core belief and because they suffer from cognitive dissonance.
And there you go projecting again.
You are yet to provide anything which even comes close to proving the globe community wrong.
The Flat Earth diagram is correct. I can't help that it doesn't fit your Globe.
No, it is completely wrong and does not match reality at all.
It fails to explain why there is a south celestial pole.
It has a tiny region of light being cast by the sun, rather than having the sun illuminate roughly half of Earth at once.
It has the shape of Australia and Antarctica completely wrong.
It has the distance between the southern continents wrong.
And so on.
Meanwhile, the globe matches quite well.
We can't help that your flat ideas don't match reality.
The surface of a sphere cannot produce this mirror image.
And yet another baseless claim.
Why can't it?
Stop just asserting garbage and start backing it up.
Do you also think this mirror can't exist:
Round surfaces can produce mirror images just fine.
The only issue would be distortion due to the mirror not being flat. But over such a tiny area of Earth, the difference in angle is so small that distortion will not be noticeable.
As a comparison, it would be like looking at this portion:
which should still produce far more distortion than that expected for Earth in your photo.