What a fwaderfer!!!
Yeah; knew you'd be too dumb to get it.
Too dumb to know I'm not a flat earther too, as well as too dumb to think up your own insults...
So, not only are you saying that rocket engines can't work in a vacuum, now you're saying that rocket engines can't even work in the atmosphere? What about all of those test videos showing the rocket engines not melting?
God, you're dumb too...
I am saying that the figures we are quoted for 'shpayze-rokkit enjinnz' are all bullshit; the temps, the speeds, the thrust, the burn-time - everything.
And your beloved 'test videos' are of crappy pimped-up flamethrowers that look impressive but are in fact useless.
Fake engines; Fake data; Fake footage; Fake Rokkitz, ALL Fake, right the way back to the gimcrack German V2 that started this whole woeful business off...
Military. Propaganda.Speaking of which, don't you claim to be ex-military, markjo?
LOL!!!
Secondly to find out if the stainless steel melts you need to calculate the net amount of energy that the stainless steel absorbs.
What a mighty shitpost from you; been beavering away at the wiki in an attempt to convince us you really ARE a pwoper scientist, have we?
But no; to find out if a paper-thin steel tube will melt when blasted by 3500C gas I don't need to calculate a damn thing.
I just need to rely on my own experience.
Have fun with your mathematical masturbation & verbal diahrrea though; maybe some sucker'll fall for it?
'Stoichiometry' - LOL!!!
Here's a tip; if you really want to stink the place out try just filling a post with Navier-Stokes equations...
Easily copy-pasta'd from wiki & no-one will know.
Toodle-pip, dingbats!