1
Flat Earth General / to day solar storm
« on: May 10, 2024, 09:20:54 PM »
is your wether clear can see the norther lights ?
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
John Davis : November 15, 2019, 11:14:22 AMPlease explain at least one.
The concept is re-appropriation of the day for the true earth. It is suggested that each flatist on this day performs an experiment in public to expose the globularist orthodoxy as dupes.
DOUBLE FORCES OF ATTRACTIVE GRAVITATION PARADOX IIno the out word circular motion is the centripetal force, gravity is the string holding the ball in.
From a classic text on mechanics:

When science teachers are asked how does gravity work, they answer in this manner:
Gravity is a force.
Gravity is directed towards the center of the orbit i.e. the sun.
That makes gravity the centripetal force.
Imagine a ball attached to a string and you are holding the other end of the string and moving your hand in such a way that the ball is in circular motion.
Then tension in the string is centripetal force.
Now, ball = earthyes
you = sun
tension in the string = gravity
Gravity is the reason one object orbits another. An analogy is swinging a ball on a string over your head. The string is like gravity, and it keeps the ball in orbit. If you let go of the string, the ball flies away from you. (Dr. Eric Christian, April 2011)
yes
http://scienceline.ucsb.edu/getkey.php?key=4569 (UCSB Science Line)
Centrifugal force acts on a rotating object in a direction opposite the axis of rotation. Imagine that you have a tennis ball tied to a string. If you swing the tennis ball on the string around in a circle, you would feel the ball tugging on the string. That is the centrifugal force on the ball. It is counteracted by tension in the string that you are holding. In this example, the tension force in the string is like the gravitational force between the earth and the sun. The ball doesn't get closer or farther from your hand. If you suddenly cut the string, the ball would go flying away, but that wont happen to the earth because of the sun's gravity.
http://scienceline.ucsb.edu/getkey.php?key=4583yes
Forces can make something move or stop something from moving. For a planet in orbit around the sun, the string is invisible. That invisible string is the gravitational force between the Earth and the sun.
Then, the Mass Attraction and General Relativity Attraction concepts are not viable models for the cause of gravity and inertia.why?
Applying any "attractive" force model to the Earth Moon dynamic forces, we obtain this system:the same force not two, from a from different point of view.
The Earth’s attractive gravitation balances the orbital centrifugal force of the Moon.
The Moon’s attractive gravitation balances the orbital centrifugal force of the Earth.
I see no doubling divorces of forces
At first this may seem like an orderly and balanced attractive force system; however,... the following paradox exists. If the seat, source and cause of the "apparent" attraction forces are "internal" to each of the bodies...the attraction concept produces twice the force that is necessary to balance the centrifugal orbital forces of a planet moon system. The concept of "attraction" between bodies requires that the force “from” each separate body acts on the remote body,-- and equally on the originating body. Another example of a balanced system is a rope under tension; each end has an equal amount of opposing force. As noted by Newton's third law of motion, " To every action there is always an opposed equal reaction".
This double force paradox is directly applicable to the "mass attraction",... the General Relativity “attraction” and all other attraction type concepts of gravity.
This example may help visualize the double force issue.
Let there be two rafts ( x and y ) freely floating on a clear calm lake with a rope between them.
Both rafts are still and are a rope length apart.
The man on (raft x) pulls on the rope which is attached to raft y.
Raft x will move toward raft y,… and raft y will move toward raft x.
Both rafts will receive equal and opposite force and motion.
It is not possible for (raft x) to remain still and be the source of the force.
The Mass Attraction Models of Gravitationthere is no doubling forces, only the point of reference is changing
The attraction concepts accept Newton's inverse square equation of gravity's force between two bodies as:
F = G x (M1 x M2) / r squared .
The surface gravity (g) for each of the bodies can be derived from the gravitational constant (G) and the mass and radius of the bodies. Using Newton's equation the g forces, allegedly "seated" in each of the "two" bodies acting on the other at a distance, can be calculated.
Within the "attraction" concepts:
From Earth, the concept requires that Earth's gravity is attracting the Moon; and an equal Earth anchored “attraction” force is pulling the Earth toward the Moon.
From the Moon, the Moon's gravity is attracting the Earth; and this Moon seated force is equally pulling the Moon toward the Earth.
why? : no Dublin of forces occur
Using: 1 ) Newton’s equation as given above, 2 ) basic arithmetic, 3 ) common logic and 4 ) the mechanics of force, it is shown that the assumed Earth and Moon seated forces are equal; and as a result;…"all attraction models" produce twice the force that is required to balance the centrifugal forces of orbit!
why? : you are seeing twice, where there is no twice; no Dublin of forces occur
The General Relativity Model of Gravitation
The exact same paradox arises with the General Relativity (GR) concept of gravity. It postulates that Mass warps a hypothetical "fabric of spacetime" and the warped fabric of spacetime causes “attraction” of other masses. Since in the GR theory the seat of the attractive force is anchored within the center of the planet’s and moon’s positions, we would again have twice the force required to balance the orbital forces of the Earth Moon system.
It's hard, you almost have it, but then you jump to the wrong conclusion,
Stanley V. Byers
« Last Edit: May 12, 2018, 06:51:23 AM by sandokhan »
More on Ligowhat is the purpose of the LISA satellite?LISA (Laser Interferometer Space Antenna) is a huge space version of LIGO. It 's purpose is to detect longer and weaker gravitational waves.Quote from: NASAWHAT is LISA?LISA is a space-based gravitational wave detector constructed of three spacecraft separated by millions of miles.
LISA's Size and Precision are Out of this World
LISA consists of three spacecraft that are separated by millions of miles and trailing tens of millions of miles, more than one hundred times the distance to the Moon, behind the Earth as we orbit the Sun. These three spacecraft relay laser beams back and forth between the different spacecraft and the signals are combined to search for gravitational wave signatures that come from distortions of spacetime. We need a giant detector bigger than the size of Earth to catch gravitational waves from orbiting black holes hundreds of millions of times more massive than our sun. NASA is a major collaborator in the European Space Agency (ESA)-led mission, which is scheduled to launch in the early 2030s and we are getting ready for it now!
LISA's enormous detector size and orbit, trailing behind the Earth as it orbits the Sun, are illustrated here. Credit: AEI/Milde Marketing
Starting at 10:31We destroyed you many times months ago. Why did you come back?
...lol...lol...lol...Destroy this, funny boy : " class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">
There is more evidence to around earth in this video then that of a flat Earth. The sun coming up over the Horizon.
“Modern Mechanics describes how on a Flat Earth the sun can be computed to 3,000 miles via triangulation, whereas on a globe earth those same angles can calculate the sun to nearly 93 million miles away -- “ from https://wiki.google.com/Distance_to_the_Sun
12:03 where is all that light coming from sun is to far a way to see, they call this twilight on a flat Earth it's not possible.
How is it even possible for the Sun 3000 Miles up appear to be behind the OAHU that is not even a mile high on the flat earth, this is impossible.
17:19 Does the sun look to be 3000 miles above OAHU , see the light under the clouds all so.
17:51 sun getting higher in the sky not just closer as it would be doing on a flat earth.
18:42 sun below the Horizon, not just further away it supposed to be 3000 miles high at OAHU just under a mile high, what is wrong with this picture, on a rounders it is understandable, on a flat Earth it's impossible!
20:14 Once again the sun 3000 miles up behind OAHU 0.8068182 miles up, give me a brake, really.
Once again it is people seeing something they can't understand even when it is in plain sight.