Are you feeling safer?

Stop being fucking retarted.

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=43826.msg1086419#msg1086419

1. Racism & Hate Speech
Automatic ban. Casual use of racist or derogatory words will lead to a relatively short ban for the first offence.

Pls be patient I have autism.
I still remember a time before covid when words meant things that we could all agree they meant. Now words means whatever we want them to mean at the time.

I respect the way you run this site, thats why I post here. I'm sorry if I upset you.

Quote from: disputeone on June 15, 2026, 04:42:23 PM

You guys are saying a lot but none of you can say that race relations arent at their lowest point in 60 years.

Objectively.

Perhaps what we are doing isnt working?
No, its the children who are wrong.

Because I don't believe that race relations are at their lowest point in 60 years.

We can have a real discussion if you want to.

From 1966 to now, which year or group of years do you believe race relations were worse than they are now?

Edit.
I thought I couldn't count to 60 but then I used my fingers and made each finger represent 10.

There's a lot of people who think you shouldn't say the word, even if you're having a discussion about racism and racist words. I don't think it is racist to use it in that context, but I still don't like to even do that, if that makes sense. I think it is because when I was a kid my mom said it was a "bad word" like a cuss word. She probably didn't want to explain to an 8yr old what it was really about. We were much more innocent about that sort of thing before the internet.

Have any of you read the Rape Gang Inquiry Report? I haven't, but people are saying it found that there were 250,000 victims since the 1950s, and 87% - 95% of the perpetrators were Muslim. Is the report reliable, like based on facts, or is it politics?  Also, I didn't know this was going on since the 1950s.

Was what going on since the 50s? Obviously their 250,000 number is complete nonsense, I read a little bit and it's kind of unhinged. Check out where the 250k number came from:

When the Rotherham/Telford scale is applied across the documented national
distribution, and multiplied by the extreme under-reporting factor accepted by
official reviews, the total reaches the 250,000 threshold as a bare minimum.

Basically, a Restore Britain MP went and found a bunch of people in various places in the UK who told him "yeah there's definitely Muslim rape gangs around here". So they counted these are real, and furthermore said, ok, we know the Rotherham rape gang had 1400 victims, so if we multiply that by the number of rape gangs Lowe "found", then we get 250k victims. Just complete nonsense.

Whats a few raped children between friends anyway?

Diversity is our greatest strength and it has many upsides (how good is the food Jura, Kabool, its just so good. I go to a ethnic restaurant at least once a week and everyone is so friendly, and the food is so nummy they even gave me three packets of sauce for free, I was so surpsied I exclaimed "three for free!" now they call me three for free.) and this is just unfortunately one of the downsides.

Anyway like Pez is saying theres just absolutely nothing anyone can do to prevent this, except perhaps more critical gender theory in the classrooms. Racists will complain about children getting raped but non racists know there's absolutely nothing that can be done to prevent this kind of thing. Ethnic rape gangs are just part and parcel of living in a big city.

You know what's funny is I nearly got angry at the way you guys were talking to SCG, implying that she is a racist or supporter of the riots because thats your defacto weapon and when the only tool you have is a hammer...

Man you could have had a good laugh at me if I took the bait and got emotional. It's lucky I'm as jaded as I am.

I'm sure you would have loved it if someone started from the real sexual abuse scandals involving Catholics and extrapolated from it to say that the nice little church you go to is a rape gang.

Something should absolutely be done about the abuse in the Catholic church. There was great intervention into the church after ww2 and perhaps its necessary again. The rate of child abuse in the Catholic Church is not actually particularly high, thats propaganda but its the way they cover it up for each other and act, frankly like our elites act where they cover up cases of child abuse for each other.

Were you under the impression I was a hypocrite?

You didn't answer, I'm sure you would like to be told that your "nice little church" is actually a rape gang, right?

Sure, why not.

Ok, I hope you enjoy your time at the rape gang then 

Thanks.

Adam Wren has written up a critique of the 250,000 number. https://x.com/aswren/status/2067052409658949869 He has something to do with the rape gang investigations, but I think he is a lawyer who has represented some of the victims. I'm not sure. Anyway, he says they came to this high number by using the number from Rotherham and scaling it across the country. So, it's not based on any evidence.

This is one issue, one major claim presented and paraded that falls apart with a little bit of scrutiny, there are quite a few others.

I won’t detail them because there are deniers and apologists that will use any vector possible to attack and minimise this topic and I don’t want to give them ammunition.

We need to recognise that we’re still operating in a hostile environment & extraordinary claims need to meet extremely high evidentiary standards to be presented as fact.

I think it’s risky, for example to publish a report talking about ‘red rooms’ and girls being killed on livestream when streaming over the dark web is basically impossible and journalists have searched for years trying to find them and failed.

Credibility is everything, and in the next few days some of the smarter opponents of this might pick it apart.

If that happens it could be incredibly damaging for survivors and the efforts of others seeking justice, especially given that lot of american accounts in particular don’t seem to understand that this isn’t some official report — it’s already extant information with testimony from people that chose to approach the inquiry and some religious/political opinion commentary.

He is worried that this report, because it makes claims that have no evidence, is going to harm the real victims. That people who don't want it investigated or anything done about it, will use this as a weapon.

That said, the interviews and testimony was worthwhile and powerful. Not something that would be in an official inquiry so a nice gap to step into & I know some of the people that worked on the project are great & upstanding people, sincere in their efforts & desire for justice.

I suppose it would be a good idea to take any hard claims about numbers with a grain of salt, but not discount the testimony of the victims.

I have no idea why they went back to the 1950s. Doesn't really make sense to me, but maybe someone will explain.

It’s not races that rape, it’s men.