I'm one of the "there were no dinosaurs" ppl.
Also, you sound stupid. There's some models that say all life is from a meteor. Even if we accept that assumption, that it's on a meteor means that the world it come from was blown to bits, that it's a
dead world.
(Yawn)
So, I'm supposed to be impressed by bacteria on a rock, so much so that I lose my shit over it. The sort of self-loathing required to hate humanity, who has reason and will, who knows how to love and make art, while most animals seem only able to procreate, to the point where think it's super-important that we discover life on rocks.
But we haven't even proven Mars footage to be anything beyond a hoax. Yes, I know that Newfoundland looks like Mars, but you can't just slap a red filter on the Earth and sky, and expect me to believe you.
How then can I believe you when you say some space rock has life on it? And how do we know it wasn't contaminated by airborne bacteria that are in the upper atmosphere? Or that God didn't send it to be fruitful and multiply?
https://www.sciencefocus.com/news/signs-of-extra-terrestrial-life-could-be-found-in-the-next-two-to-three-years-astronomers-claim/https://www.nasa.gov/content/finding-life-beyond-earth-is-within-reach/You see this? These are called teases. Two years have passed from the 2021 article, and no life was found.
https://www.livescience.com/alien-discoveries-2020.htmlNote the rampant use of "could" and "might" in this article, e.g. The Milky Way could be filled with ocean life.
Then they close the article after telling us nothing real with "We should be open-minded..." When someone says that, what they really mean is, "You should think like we do, you should open your mind while we continue to have fixed assumptions." No thanks. You know, I'm actually okay with life on this Earth.
Oh this oughta be good, 10 Scientifically Possible Extraterrestrial Life-Forms. Oh I misread, I thought it said "scientifically proven." Probably the same clickbait.
No, it's worse. It's science fiction. It talks about methane and silicon-based life, or energy-based life. There a reason life came from carbon, it's because chemical reactions like digestion tend to revolve around only a few chemicals. The analogous chemicals that such a being would need to consume do not exactly have the same chemical traits.
That is, if we shift even one over to have a nitrogen lifeform, they would use as "sugar" N
6He
12F
6. See the problem? Life is carbon-based. And despite all conjecture of life in meteors, that all mention of it actually happening turning to theories means it is not real.