Orbital mechanics need masses to orbit and L2 has no mass = no orbit. Actually JWST can only orbit Earth like the Moon.
Actually, orbital mechanics needs gravity to orbit. Granted, there is no gravity at L2, but JWST is about 1 million miles away from L2 where there is gravity from the sun, earth and moon.
Almost correct. JWST is just orbiting Earth all the time, which has a mass of unknown order. The JWST orbit/trajectory is a circle around Earth. Like the Moon. Try to get out of it and start orbiting something else, e.g. L2 with no mass, you are a magician. BTW the Sun also orbits the Earth or vice versa. It is a mystery. I think there are other forces at play than gravity. Ever heard of Hannes Alfvén? http://heiwaco.com/moontravelb1.htm
Explain mathematically exactly what makes orbiting another object impossible?
Thanks for asking. Your question is OT! But anyway. Any object, e.g. a satellite, JWST or space craft being ejected from Earth into an orbit in space, can only orbit Earth. Nothing else. It cannot start orbiting the Sun or the Moon and land on the Moon or similar, incl. L2. Reason is that the speed, when being ejected from Earth into an orbit in space, is too big to change the orbit later. You cannot carry the energy with you to stop or change your orbital trajectory.
You can of course just go straight up into space until you run out of fuel. No orbit. After a while you stop and drop down back on Earth. End of trip. NASA and ESA experts disagree of course with me, but they cannot explain how to change orbits in space with available energy/fuel aboard. That is why all space trips are one-way only with no safe return. It means that humans cannot travel in space. Much better to send robots. Robots do not need toilets. Only NASA and ESA train asstronuts to go to the International Space Station, ISS, to be weightless clowns on TV and get famous. But there is no toilet on the ISS. Guess why!
One, they do explain how, two you cane "carry energy with you" in the form of fuel. "Reason is that the speed, when being ejected from Earth into an orbit in space, is too big to change the orbit later." What evidence do you have for this assertion.
There are simulations when you can make a rocket undergo orbital changes (e.g. Kerbal space program)
FInally, I noitce no mathematics.
Heiwa's whole thing, specifically about Apollo but applied to anything leaving LEO, is about fuel consumption and not being able to carry enough to do so.
But he has some bonkers calculations that have been destroyed by every forum going back a dozen or so years. And he has been banned from every forum, the likes of Apollo hoax, 911 truthers, general skeptics, across the web with the exception of this one, because he won't listen to anyone that calls him out on his ignorance.
All of this from I think the ApolloHoax.net forum a decade or so ago:
1) Heiwa kicks off his posts with his own “simplified” fuel calculations with, "
Evidently it changes when fuel is consumed - but I keep it constant…”. Absolutely hilarious. Calculations based upon no change in mass due to fuel consumption pretty much blows up the his entire premise right out of the starting gate.
2) Astrodynamics professionals try and explain that no, his “simple” equations are incorrect. "
There are no "my" equations; there are only the proper equations. Your "simplifications" based on your obviously limited knowledge of astrodynamics do not suffice. I've given you the hint: you must consider the natural logarithm of the ratio of start and end masses.” Again, hilarious. Just making up his own calculations with no connection to reality.
3) He gets called out with not being able to perform a simple middle school calculation:
Heiwa's:
2400^2 - 1500^2 = 3,510,000
And this
Reality: (2400-1500)^2 = 810,000It goes on and on. On that forum alone there are dozens of pages where actual astrophysicists and aeronautics professionals try and teach him, but he would have none of it. Eventually banned. Same for every other forum. And it seems universal that no one believes he's an actual engineer, the notion defies logic given the uselessness of what he throws out.
I think that's why he says things like, "Calculations aren't needed," etc. Because he knows his are nonsense.