Apparently Bernie is the opponent Trump wants! https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/01/trump-bernie-sanders-socialism.html?via=features
I like how this claims he's gonna lose because of his socialism and then "proves" it by posting a poll which supposedly shows it's unpopular. Apparently this poll matters but not the ones that show Bernie winning against Trump. Most Americans reject "liberalism" too, but no one ever was like "oh, Democrats will lose unless they stop being liberals". A lot of people don't really understand these labels anyways.
This is proven by the next part of the article which says that 20% of the people who vote for Sanders previously answered they reject socialism. And then instead of the writer saying "oh, well, I guess this contradicts my hypothesis, let's look at actual polls specifically about the issue, and polls about the policies he supports" he just says "nah that's too optimistic, no way he will win". Then he claims about his policies show that they are "unpopular" or whatever as evidenced by two polls that contradict each other. Then he does the classic fallacy of "if we attract the centrists we will also get those left of center as well", which is just false. Not only is it perfectly possible for a left wing position to attract more previously right wing voters than a centrist position (that's the case with many of Sanders' policies) but also the centrist position isn't guaranteed to earn the votes for the other end either. It's funny that these writers usually are the same who blame Bernie supporters for not voting in 2016 and making Hillary lose (which wasn't even accurate back then) but they just can't connect the dots.
He also lies about Sanders supposedly not having a plan to pay for the policies, echoing the CNN debate where the moderators still acted like he didn't explain right after he did.
And yeah, I'm sure it's gonna be super convincing if Trump attacks Sanders with some silly thing about medicine he wrote 50 years ago. You know, the guy who was tweeting about vaccines causing autism (many such cases!) less than a decade ago. Wow, huge liability. It seems like the author is a Warren supporter. I guess he forgot about the "Pocahontas" thing, that's clearly not a liability at all.
That's why I hate the articles about "electability", it's never genuine, it's just "I don't like this candidate, but instead of saying that I'll just project my preference on the voters and say it's them who actually don't like the candidate".