Don't forget to mention the Apollo 11 footage that was recovered from an IBM contractors basement, as well as the pioneer and Helios missions. NASA sure has a nack for making problems disappear.
And they were still recovered, weren't they? And all of the footage exists in copies, doesn't it?
The "lower-res" copies were recordings of supposed live broadcasts. They forgot that people were recording their shenanigans. Even NASA can screw up every now and then when they are attempting to cover their tracks. At least the recordings were of very low quality so it is harder for people to spot all of the BS in the films.
We know they're live. They had live conversations with mission control (unless MC was in on it too), and in some landings they commented on current events.
NASA didn't forget. Every news station around the world was making copies. Honeysuckle in Australia was too. NASA knew this.
Even NASA can screw up every now and then when they are attempting to cover their tracks.
Yet they didn't screw up.
At least the recordings were of very low quality so it is harder for people to spot all of the BS in the films.
Only the first landing was in low quality, and that was the TV broadcast (which has since been heavily restored).
Apollo 11's 16mm film still exists in pristine condition, documenting nearly all of the EVA. The TV footage for all other missions (excluding 12 cause camera issues) still exists in very high quality, along with all other missions' 16mm footage.
I can show you a long list of people associated with the Clintons who suffered untimely yet suspicious deaths. Are you saying they are all just coincidences?
Jroa, those are not mutually exclusive. The space business, as well as any flying, comes with a particular risk. Not because some government agency will kill you, but because these are machines with fuel flying much faster than any other manmade object. They have a possibility of malfunctioning. Human error could cause problems. The weather might cause problems. You can't say every death surrounding something means that the people were all killed.
I think you meant not mutually inclusive, as in, "Just because the Clintons kill a lot of people, that does not mean that NASA does it too."
I guess, but that's my point. Spaceflight, or any flight, is much riskier. You also have no actual proof NASA killed any of them. Just speculation and theories