~ TRY AGAIN ~
You are the one that keeps on failing.
But how about this. Stop trying.
Instead of just coming up with crap to try and fail at showing a problem with the globe or at showing your model is correct; stop and analyse the available evidence and realise it indicates Earth is round, or come up with a rational argument which you think shows it isn't.
Now I want clarification about different versions of earth radius.
Which one is true?
Earth is not a perfectly symmetrical spherical shell.
As such several radii can describe it.
Due to the asymmetry caused by the rotation of Earth (and to a lesser extent the non-homogenous distribution of mas), the radii in each direction is different.
The equatorial radii are larger than the polar radii, and you also have other radii all over Earth.
You then have the issue of the layers.
The inner and outer core, the mantle, the crust, the seal level and the atmosphere all have different radii and some are not very clear cut.
The crust goes down quite far reaching deep into the Mariana Trench, 11 km (note: even though this is the deepest ocean, this is too close to the equator too be the closest to the centre of Earth, it is much closer to the centre of Earth in the Arctic and Antarctic sea) and goes protudes high into the sky to the tip of mount everest.
The interface between the layers is not always smooth.
For sea level you have the issue of tides also deforming it.
But perhaps the hardest is the atmosphere (and the layers within it) which was once done as an arbitrary line in the sand 100 km above sea level, even though the thermosphere extends to 500-1000 km, before we have the exosphere which is commonly taken as space.
So it isn't a simple case of Earth having a true radius.
It has a variety which can be used to explain it.
However for most purposes, as it is a rocky planet the most useful radii is that of the surface, taken at a non-arbitrary level, which places it at mean sea level (any other line we pick along the surface will be rather arbitrary, unless we determine the crust composition very accurately such that we can virtually smooth it out), either as an oblate spheroid with an equatorial and polar radii, or as a sphere with a mean radius (of 6371 km).