uh oh. another nail. sorry guys.

First American shpayze walk was stop motion animation:



Dig the cowboy boots too!

Hey, Papa. As you seem to know what sandokhan is referring to, could you, please, explain it to me?

At the last meeting of their flat earth anti NASA society, it was decided that Mathematics was an invention of NASA and as such is part of the conspiracy since it negates the obvious proof that the earth is flat.

Or something along those lines

Papa, here is your chance to prove us wrong. What does sandokhan's link mean, as you seem to know?

Or are you a lying piece of shit?

Here's an entire thread of REtards being unable to multiply by Zero or count to Two...

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=67626.0

So yeah, I'd keep quiet on the whole math thing if I were you.

Back to that stop motion animation shpayze walk:



Ooh - jerky!

So you haven't got a clue. Not especially surprising.

Example of REtard math: 1+0=2...

Therefore shpayze shippz!

Now this...

First Russian shpayze walk had wibbly wobbly back projected Earth:

You just keep evading.

You were offered a chance to help your cause, but as you are person who tries to impress people by lying, you were burned.

You sound like a character from a hackneyed old black and white B-movie...

Here's Big Bill Shatner to intensify the surrealism factor:

Here's an entire thread of REtards being unable to multiply by Zero or count to Two...

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=67626.0

So yeah, I'd keep quiet on the whole math thing if I were you.

Back to that stop motion animation shpayze walk:



Ooh - jerky!

Thanks for the link that shows rockets work in a vacuum.

Jerry is a confused person. He does not always know what he is doing. But I am sure he will tell us how the video does exactly the opposite.

Quote from: dutchy on February 06, 2018, 05:25:06 AM

Quote from: rvlvr on February 06, 2018, 02:20:59 AM

But I do question your judgement it comes to who you associate with. I do not understand how anyone would like be connected with someone like Papa Legba. Can you honestly say he is a person you'd like to have around you in real life? "That Papa Legba is salt of the Earth, a real straight shooter!"

For decades ordinary men simply had to accept all that governments and space agencies claimed about our reality.
The moment someone stood up, he/she was met with redicule and bamboozled with jargon as a simpleton and lunatic.(Bill Kaysing, Ralph René)
After 9/11 huge numbers of people started to raise questions about offical stories that didn't cut it.
The moonlandinghoax was reloaded and even the shape of our world was doubted by increasingly growing numbers.
The redicule continued from the official channels trying to demotivate this new arise of stupidity !

Persons like Papa Legba are returning the favour of ongoing redicule in a humoristic and rock solid fashion.
Yes he crosses the line now and then, but it is nothing compared to what certain  disbelievers in 9/11 and the moonhoax had to endure.....
I fully support him in dismantling the arrogant attitude of the popular opinion that has used all aggressive means to make sure no one lifts the veil.
But this decade things have changed dramaticcally and the old scientific bamboozle jargon approach doesn't cut it much longer.
Watching all old space related  tv propaganda it is absolutely baffling not to doubt the achievements.

Quote

Do you think bringing up Clarke and Hubbard in defense of NASA never going to space is an intelligent thing? Is it an argument a sane person would make?

It has nothing to do with intelligence, but a sign on the wall !!
If a NAZI criminal can lead NASA and a pedophile SF writer's fantasies were soon materialised then i do see  the relevancy.
It seems that the moral standards within the leading caste are abmysal.... and it explains this quote from Walter McDougall on film !!:
"Eisenhouwer finally came to understand that the only way to tranquilize the nation was to give the American people a satellite "!!

The above has nothing to do with science but propaganda and if you really believe those could go hand in hand your historic awareness is lacking.
Where these forms of propaganda are displayed we know for a fact that authorites lie and cheat about the very thing the boast about .

But since every space related claim is supported till date you can understand why it is besides any objective truth...... how could it when propaganda was used the way it was.

If only you had any evidence to support your claims about space flight or the shape of the earth.  But all you ever offer is you don't understand it and it doesn't look right to you.

I object !
As i have clearly proved is that within the leadership of the US military the Explorer 1 in orbit was a tranquilizer to satisfy the American public.
They were so afraid now Russia could orbit earth, that their atomic arsenal could easily reach any part in the USA and the world.... the USA needed to be on the same military level.
Explorer 1 reached that goal.

Now i have to believe that ground control had to wait a considerable amount of time to varify if the satellite had indeed reached orbit !!!
What you and other basically claim is :
1 A rocket went to space to deliver an unique  package
2 They set certain onboard parameters in advance
3 They couldn't remote control the rocket during flight
4 The rocket was able to reach the exact height and velocity and deployed a satelite the way it was uhhhh 'programmed' to do...
5 some anxious moment to finally confirm the satellite was indeed in earth's orbit.


Superb !!!! Now you have to explain in your own words how this Hollywood production worked !!
Take it easy with me, because i have a tendency to scream :"it looks fake as part of a cheap propaganda scam"
I do hope you and others will finally give some details that made this magic work !

So how does the Soviet space program fit into all this?

How the Leonov flights were faked...

http://www.svengrahn.pp.se/histind/Fakes/Fakes.htm
http://www.vho.org/tr/2004/3/Kausch250-253.html

'Four months of solid research interviewing experts in the fields of photo-optics, photo-chemistry and electro-optics, all of whom carefully studied the motion picture film and still photographs officially released by the Soviet Government ... (indicate them to be) double-printed .. The foreground (Leonov) was superimposed on the background (Earth below). The Russian film showed reflections from the glass plate under which a double plate is made ... Leonov was suspended from wire or cables ... In several episodes of the Russian film, light was reflected from a small portion of wire (or cable) attached to Leonov's space suit ... One camera angle was impossible of achievement. This showed Leonov crawling out of his hatch into space. It was a head on shot, so the camera would have had to have been located out in space beyond the space ship.'

So how does the Soviet space program fit into all this?

I realy like to explain, but you see...... i am still waiting for someone to answer my questions first.
You know....about late fifties rocket techniques and the ability to deploy satelites without remote guidance of any sort......

No, I think it would be beneficial for all if you could let us know about the Soviets. I think it is needed to get the full picture as I am sure you understand.

Quote from: Badxtoss on February 06, 2018, 06:51:51 AM

Quote from: dutchy on February 06, 2018, 05:25:06 AM

Quote from: rvlvr on February 06, 2018, 02:20:59 AM

But I do question your judgement it comes to who you associate with. I do not understand how anyone would like be connected with someone like Papa Legba. Can you honestly say he is a person you'd like to have around you in real life? "That Papa Legba is salt of the Earth, a real straight shooter!"

For decades ordinary men simply had to accept all that governments and space agencies claimed about our reality.
The moment someone stood up, he/she was met with redicule and bamboozled with jargon as a simpleton and lunatic.(Bill Kaysing, Ralph René)
After 9/11 huge numbers of people started to raise questions about offical stories that didn't cut it.
The moonlandinghoax was reloaded and even the shape of our world was doubted by increasingly growing numbers.
The redicule continued from the official channels trying to demotivate this new arise of stupidity !

Persons like Papa Legba are returning the favour of ongoing redicule in a humoristic and rock solid fashion.
Yes he crosses the line now and then, but it is nothing compared to what certain  disbelievers in 9/11 and the moonhoax had to endure.....
I fully support him in dismantling the arrogant attitude of the popular opinion that has used all aggressive means to make sure no one lifts the veil.
But this decade things have changed dramaticcally and the old scientific bamboozle jargon approach doesn't cut it much longer.
Watching all old space related  tv propaganda it is absolutely baffling not to doubt the achievements.

Quote

Do you think bringing up Clarke and Hubbard in defense of NASA never going to space is an intelligent thing? Is it an argument a sane person would make?

It has nothing to do with intelligence, but a sign on the wall !!
If a NAZI criminal can lead NASA and a pedophile SF writer's fantasies were soon materialised then i do see  the relevancy.
It seems that the moral standards within the leading caste are abmysal.... and it explains this quote from Walter McDougall on film !!:
"Eisenhouwer finally came to understand that the only way to tranquilize the nation was to give the American people a satellite "!!

The above has nothing to do with science but propaganda and if you really believe those could go hand in hand your historic awareness is lacking.
Where these forms of propaganda are displayed we know for a fact that authorites lie and cheat about the very thing the boast about .

But since every space related claim is supported till date you can understand why it is besides any objective truth...... how could it when propaganda was used the way it was.

If only you had any evidence to support your claims about space flight or the shape of the earth.  But all you ever offer is you don't understand it and it doesn't look right to you.

I object !
As i have clearly proved is that within the leadership of the US military the Explorer 1 in orbit was a tranquilizer to satisfy the American public.
They were so afraid now Russia could orbit earth, that their atomic arsenal could easily reach any part in the USA and the world.... the USA needed to be on the same military level.
Explorer 1 reached that goal.

Now i have to believe that ground control had to wait a considerable amount of time to varify if the satellite had indeed reached orbit !!!
What you and other basically claim is :
1 A rocket went to space to deliver an unique  package
2 They set certain onboard parameters in advance
3 They couldn't remote control the rocket during flight
4 The rocket was able to reach the exact height and velocity and deployed a satelite the way it was uhhhh 'programmed' to do...
5 some anxious moment to finally confirm the satellite was indeed in earth's orbit.


Superb !!!! Now you have to explain in your own words how this Hollywood production worked !!
Take it easy with me, because i have a tendency to scream :"it looks fake as part of a cheap propaganda scam"
I do hope you and others will finally give some details that made this magic work !

You haven't proven anything, you have claimed things, that's all.
The rest of the post is basically you saying you don't understand it so it can't be possible.

How the Leonov flights were faked...

http://www.svengrahn.pp.se/histind/Fakes/Fakes.htm
http://www.vho.org/tr/2004/3/Kausch250-253.html

'Four months of solid research interviewing experts in the fields of photo-optics, photo-chemistry and electro-optics, all of whom carefully studied the motion picture film and still photographs officially released by the Soviet Government ... (indicate them to be) double-printed .. The foreground (Leonov) was superimposed on the background (Earth below). The Russian film showed reflections from the glass plate under which a double plate is made ... Leonov was suspended from wire or cables ... In several episodes of the Russian film, light was reflected from a small portion of wire (or cable) attached to Leonov's space suit ... One camera angle was impossible of achievement. This showed Leonov crawling out of his hatch into space. It was a head on shot, so the camera would have had to have been located out in space beyond the space ship.'

And neither of those links state space flight is impossible. They mention satellites, for example. Yes, it could be Soviets used deception it came to some manned flights, but nowhere does it say anything about space flight being impossible.

For example:
"However, the primary objective of the Soyuz 1/2 flight - rendezvous and docking was brilliantly carried out with two unmanned craft in October 1967, a mere 6 months after the death of Vladimir Komarov in Soyuz 1."

"Here are clearly some hints, as to what had been going on during Soviet space flights in the sixties. The trackers of Bochum University almost blew the whole hoax; they were very close to breaking the great secret of pretended Soviet manned spaceflights - had they only pursued the mystery with an unprejudiced mind.

They had found signals, which indicated that 'Voskhod2' was still in orbit after it was due to land."

Not sure what you wanted to achieve by posting said links...

Quote from: Papa Legba on February 06, 2018, 08:05:20 AM

Here's an entire thread of REtards being unable to multiply by Zero or count to Two...

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=67626.0

So yeah, I'd keep quiet on the whole math thing if I were you.

Back to that stop motion animation shpayze walk:



Ooh - jerky!

Thanks for the link that shows rockets work in a vacuum.

Yeah, and 2+2=5 too, psycho:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?t=8s&v=rJz77y4d_JA

I know you shillbots want this forum to be your own personal Room 101, whilst you are the rats in the facemask...

But you're just too lame to get away with it...

Everyone sees through you and knows what you are.

So find a new tactic.

So what was it you wanted to prove with the video, Jerry?

So what was it you wanted to prove with the video, Jerry?

Rat in facemask detected.

http://www.george-orwell.org/1984/21.html

Rat status: shit, fake and gay.

I got you, you dumb piece of shit.

But really, what was it? You and sandokhan did not exactly strike gold with your last posts.

I got you, you dumb piece of shit.

Rat gayness intensifies.

As i have clearly proved is that within the leadership of the US military the Explorer 1 in orbit was a tranquilizer to satisfy the American public.

Is the problem you don't understand what proof is?  Your "proof" consists of an historian editorializing on events that took place when he was 12 years old.  Even if he were part of the administration at the time and made the statement, you're making the assumption that there is only one reason to do something.  Yes, it was politically sound for Eisenhower to get a satellite up, but it was also militarily sound.  One reason doesn't invalidate the other. 

Now i have to believe that ground control had to wait a considerable amount of time to varify if the satellite had indeed reached orbit !!!

It took them over 90 minutes to verify.

What you and other basically claim is :
1 A rocket went to space to deliver an unique  package
2 They set certain onboard parameters in advance
3 They couldn't remote control the rocket during flight
4 The rocket was able to reach the exact height and velocity and deployed a satelite the way it was uhhhh 'programmed' to do...
5 some anxious moment to finally confirm the satellite was indeed in earth's orbit.

No, actually.  The orbit Explorer 1 went into was significantly higher than planned, so it didn't reach "the exact height and velocity" the way it was programmed.  Does the fact that it didn't actually go perfectly make you reconsider your position?

Rat status: ignoring this post.

How the Leonov flights were faked...

http://www.svengrahn.pp.se/histind/Fakes/Fakes.htm
http://www.vho.org/tr/2004/3/Kausch250-253.html

'Four months of solid research interviewing experts in the fields of photo-optics, photo-chemistry and electro-optics, all of whom carefully studied the motion picture film and still photographs officially released by the Soviet Government ... (indicate them to be) double-printed .. The foreground (Leonov) was superimposed on the background (Earth below). The Russian film showed reflections from the glass plate under which a double plate is made ... Leonov was suspended from wire or cables ... In several episodes of the Russian film, light was reflected from a small portion of wire (or cable) attached to Leonov's space suit ... One camera angle was impossible of achievement. This showed Leonov crawling out of his hatch into space. It was a head on shot, so the camera would have had to have been located out in space beyond the space ship.'

Quote from: markjo on February 06, 2018, 06:55:37 AM

Quote from: Papa Legba on February 06, 2018, 12:10:21 AM

And nothing burns in a hard vacuum.

Technically, nothing needs to burn in a vacuum for rockets to work.

Lol rockets work by witchcraft in mad markbot world!

If you think that cold gas thrusters and Newton's 3rd law are witchcraft, then that's your problem, not mine.

Rat status: ignoring this post.

Quote from: sandokhan on February 06, 2018, 09:25:02 AM

How the Leonov flights were faked...

http://www.svengrahn.pp.se/histind/Fakes/Fakes.htm
http://www.vho.org/tr/2004/3/Kausch250-253.html

'Four months of solid research interviewing experts in the fields of photo-optics, photo-chemistry and electro-optics, all of whom carefully studied the motion picture film and still photographs officially released by the Soviet Government ... (indicate them to be) double-printed .. The foreground (Leonov) was superimposed on the background (Earth below). The Russian film showed reflections from the glass plate under which a double plate is made ... Leonov was suspended from wire or cables ... In several episodes of the Russian film, light was reflected from a small portion of wire (or cable) attached to Leonov's space suit ... One camera angle was impossible of achievement. This showed Leonov crawling out of his hatch into space. It was a head on shot, so the camera would have had to have been located out in space beyond the space ship.'

You did not even read the articles. So what they faked some of it -- neither of the articles say space flight is a hoax.

Do you want me to send you flowers? Would that make you feel better?

Here's an entire thread of REtards being unable to multiply by Zero or count to Two...

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=67626.0

So yeah, I'd keep quiet on the whole math thing if I were you.

Back to that stop motion animation shpayze walk:



Ooh - jerky!

That spacewalk was filmed at 6 fps and converted to 24 fps.

Stop motion animation is usually filmed at 24 or 30 fps with the subject being moved either every frame or every 2nd frame.
http://www.scottdaros.com/claymation-frame-rates.html

Quote from: rvlvr on February 06, 2018, 09:22:08 AM

So how does the Soviet space program fit into all this?

I realy like to explain, but you see...... i am still waiting for someone to answer my questions first.
You know....about late fifties rocket techniques and the ability to deploy satelites without remote guidance of any sort......

What makes you think that there was no remote guidance?  When do you think radio control was invented?

In September, 1898, at Madison Square Garden, Nikola Tesla revealed a new invention: a radio-controlled torpedo boat. It was the first demonstration of wireless remote control in history, and it caused, in Tesla’s words, “a sensation such as no other invention of mine has ever produced.” Some witnesses believed that the Croatian inventor was using mind control.

Rats in facemask detected.

Rat status: pissed off and shitposting like mad.

Advice: LOL!!!!

Ladies and gentlemen... Buzz Aldrin!



SCIENCE!

Quote from: dutchy on February 06, 2018, 09:25:46 AM

Quote from: rvlvr on February 06, 2018, 09:22:08 AM

So how does the Soviet space program fit into all this?

I realy like to explain, but you see...... i am still waiting for someone to answer my questions first.
You know....about late fifties rocket techniques and the ability to deploy satelites without remote guidance of any sort......

What makes you think that there was no remote guidance?  When do you think radio control was invented?

Quote from: https://www.newyorker.com/tech/elements/object-of-interest-remote-control

In September, 1898, at Madison Square Garden, Nikola Tesla revealed a new invention: a radio-controlled torpedo boat. It was the first demonstration of wireless remote control in history, and it caused, in Tesla’s words, “a sensation such as no other invention of mine has ever produced.” Some witnesses believed that the Croatian inventor was using mind control.

I was talking about the EXACT SPEED IN RELATION TO ALTITUDE AND ANGLE NEEDED TO REACH THE PREFERED ORBIT....they could not correct those in real time from the ground !!!!!!!!!

So how did they manage to reach the required altitude and velocity to deploy the satellite with such precision as the numbers Rabinoz provided indicate...?
Here another snippet from the propaganda :
''The missile is in flight but it will take another hour and a half to know whether the satellite is in orbit''
Boy o boy what a nonsence......

You really are something aren't you ? Do you believe this nonsical propaganda without any scientific substance for one moment ?