If you wouldn't be such an indoctrinated sheep you would try to listen.
Ah yes! Insults! Keep'm comming!
I will brake it down real simple.
1 I have researched the moonlandings for i think about 5 years
2 I couldn't believe there were real people dumb enough to doubt the greatest achievement of mankind
3 I read chapters in the books of Bill Kaysing and Ralph Renee that started a process.
4 I watched all Jarrah White's video's about the moonlandings and read the counter arguments at the Clavius forum (pro NASA)
5 I started to look for every interview in papers and online footage made by astronauts and NASA insiders.
6 It became clear there were huge discrepancies in the official storyline
7 I read about how scientists and rocket engeneres envisioned spacetravel in the fifties and how extremely different it was when Apollo became reality.
8 I started to read about an ongoing rehabilitation program for Nazi's in the USA that lasted until the nineties and the heavy involvement from NASA.
9 I learned between the connection of Walt Disney and NASA (Werner Von Braun)

10 I started to examine the photographs and original video from the moon
11 I learned about that episode in American history...the Kennedy legacy, the cold war, and riots on home soil.
12 during the nineties NASA has repaired a lot of mistakes of the past concerning the Apollo missions.
Cool story bro!
You know, i have plenty of knowledge on greek mythology and others, i could talk to you hours and hours about it, but in the end, all that knowledge isn't
proof of the existence of Zeus.
All you say is that "i've read this, i've read that, 've learnt about this, i discovered that wich this guy said" but in the end all that isn't a proof of fakery, just you have to demonstrate with proof and logical arguments, not with just "i read this wich implies...".
My argument: "Don't make an argument that you can't prove" comes from the fact that everytime you have been asked to prove something, you fail to, you just say "but this video says..." and that's all. Heck! You have a complete post made specially for you to post all of your proof that demonstrates that NASA lies, and you have yet to do so, i mean, if it is true that you have 5 years into this conspiracy debunkery, where are all these photos that you have examined? I believe you would've found somenthing that prove them fake with a solid explanation as to why by now.
You could say "i belive this is fake, but still don't have a complete explanation for it" and that would be ok (for me at least). But instead, you write in such way ("this is like that, sorry can't prove it. have to go to a party!") that damages your image (that is, if you still want people to take you serious and believe you when you find and explain your defintive proof) (not asking you to be a saint neither, you can have your funny conversations if you still want them)
After a few years in a fascinating personal journey it became so obvious that it was all a hoax during the Vietnam war and president Nixon in charge.
An heroic story to boast the USA in rough times and fullfill the ''prophecy'' of Kennedy just before the decade was over.
Then the house of cards was coming down real fast.
Each and every evidence of the moonlandings proved the opposite to me.....
I have been very, very cautious for years to dismiss the moonlandings and did take the subject way more serious than many believers and even astronauts who make a mockery of themselves and the tax payer, or are extremely lazy when it comes to the details.
What was it you wanted to discuss about the moonlandings and/or NASA ? Please specify !
Oh honey! This is where things get interesting you see, my belief that the Earth is more likely to be round than flat doesn't comes from NASA, but apparently your belief on the FET comes from your distrust on NASA and a very unlikely conspiracy.
I have never asked you about the moonlanding, not once i believe. All i have asked in this site is for people (not just you) to back their claims (at least with a logical argument), not to keep saying the same thing over and over like a broken record, this leads to nowhere.
So dutchy, do you have a moonlanding picture with a logical explanation that demonstrates that NASA faked the moonlanding? If so, post it here (or in the post i mentioned bfore), just one and explain why it demonstrates your point by making a constrast on NASA's data specs and why said specs are wrong and are not represented in the end result (photo)
You have about 5 years into this and have read plenty on this stuff, it should be easy for you to do so by now.
If not, then i believe you already know my answer. Until that, I will be waiting for your proof when you already find it.
And by the way, Simba is Swahili for Leon (Lion in spanish), put it backwars and you got my name
