How do the Americans' conspiracy theories sound to foreigners?

Why do you guys argue for a new investigation of 9/11? If so many both governmental and nongovernmental investigations didn't find any evidence of a conspiracy, isn't it extremely unlikely that new investigations will find anything? And you realize how costly those investigations are? It's obvious to anyone who gets deeper into 9/11 that the alleged evidence of a conspiracy is just misunderstanding of science. There are basically no unexplained events in the contemporary US history.
On the other hand, here in Croatia, modern history is full of unexplained events. During the time of Yugoslavia, most of the national minorities, especially Germans and Italians, either died in "accidents" or simply disappeared. It's depressingly obvious that there was a nationalistic organization that killed thousands, if not tens of thousands, of people over a few decades. And the government still suppresses any investigation of it. And the reason is easily guessable: many of the modern-day Croatian politicians have nationalistic beliefs. And the death of the president Broz: it was rumored a few days BEFORE he died that there was a fascist organization that will poison him because of his alleged Russian ancestry. As far as I am aware, there have been zero investigations of the event. Maybe it's because some contemporary politicians were involved in it, and maybe also because people are very uncomfortable thinking that fascism might not have died out in Croatia by the end of the World War II. Why don't we ever hear those things discussed?

I don't support either the policies of the president Broz nor the War on Terror, I am trying to be as objective as possible.

Why do you guys argue for a new investigation of 9/11? If so many both governmental and nongovernmental investigations didn't find any evidence of a conspiracy, isn't it extremely unlikely that new investigations will find anything? And you realize how costly those investigations are? It's obvious to anyone who gets deeper into 9/11 that the alleged evidence of a conspiracy is just misunderstanding of science. There are basically no unexplained events in the contemporary US history.

Any credibility you have built on the forum just went out the window lmao...

Sorry couldn't make it any further than this.

Please go meditate and try again 

I'm going to admit to something that I'm really not proud of.  American care much less about world history than the world cares about American history. 

So when you bring up a lot of these incidents, most of us have probably never heard of them.

To me it doesn't really seem like FlatAssembler is being objective. As for the national minorities, listen, people are way more likely to believe in a conspiracy if a person died in an accident than if it survived, even though the actual probability is equal. And maybe the number of Germans and Italians went drastically down because of them not having children, rather than so many of them having been murdered. I haven't look into it very much, that just seems like a natural assumption. As for the president Broz, if you look about his death on Wikipedia, you'll see that he was actually quite ill weeks before he died. Newspapers were, of course, full of the stories about his health. The fact that there were conspiracy theories about him being poisoned is not really that surprising. So, yeah, I think that FlatAssembler is doing exactly the same mistakes Americans do when they believe in 9/11 conspiracy theories.

Misunderstanding of science my left nut.

Things are getting pretty serious.
http://www.wtc7evaluation.org/

"Physicsmaster" if you do have a physics degree I suggest you look into the 2.25 second symmetrical free-fall of wtc 7 caused by "ordinary office fires" and tell me it's easily explained?

This is an orange.