What does FE earth move through?

From what I've read, in the FE model "gravity" is caused by earth moving upwards in a constant rate.
But if space doesn't exist, what does earth "move upwards" in?
In the RE theory space exists and earth moves through space in an orbit around the sun. But if earth is all there is and nothing exists outside of earth as FET suggests, then how can earth move upwards through nothing?

Who said that space does not exist in FET?

Are you wondering what the FES position is on "Who said that space does not exist in FET?"

Or was that question meant as an answer to the OP?

Theres no such thing as nothing.

Think about it.

I know there's no such thing as nothing, that's not what I meant neither. What I'm wondering is what does earth "move through" according to FET?
As there's no such thing as nothing, and since outer space doesn't exist in FET (from what I've understood) then what does Earth move upwards through?

Or am I simply mistaken in thinking space doesn't exist in FET?

Space exists in most FE theories (that I'm aware of).

I do not believe the Earth is moving at all so the answer is nothing.

Well if earth isn't moving at all then how would you explain gravity?

Well if earth isn't moving at all then how would you explain gravity?

Denpressure.

Theres no such thing as nothing.

Think about it.

You make my head hurt.   

Well if earth isn't moving at all then how would you explain gravity?

Earth isin't moving anywhere. Completely stationary. It is an unquestionable truth. In none of physical experiment the movement of the world has been observed in any direction. So it hasen't.

There is two explanation about gravity. Both of them may be possible seperately or both.

One of them is Atmospheric stringency. this can be. But there are some dots can't be good explained. especially sceptimatic  defends it in FES.

The other strong theory is "sky pushing force". This is the opposite of gravitation.  But there are some dots can't be good explained in this theory too. Especially I'm defending it.

Both of them has possibility to be fact. Or one of them can move one Step forward Along with solution development at unexplained points. It is possible Atmospheric stringency caused by sky pushing force; or we change the theory of sky pushing force as we meant with it Atmospheric stringency. That is, they may be intermingled or affecting each other. Debate continues in this regard.

Where the part that interests you there is two main theories and both or seperately they are acceptable.

In the Flat Earth model, 'gravity', rather than being a force, is the upward acceleration of the Earth. The Earth always accelerates upward at 1g, which is equivalent to the gravitational acceleration in the Round Earth model. Like the force of gravity, the Earth's acceleration causes several commonly observed phenomena in our daily lives. https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/tiki/tiki-index.php?page=Gravity&highlight=gravitation

This is written in Tiki is admin's own ideas. Or maybe a joke. We not accept with it. It is a nonsence. The person who wrote it should be a moron. FE movement is bigger than one. Especially that moron.

I'm disporiving moron admin's nonsence with one sentence in 10 seconds: If the world was moving, a balloon with has same specific weight as the atmosphere would fall down. But static. So the earth isin't moving any of direction, up, or down, rigt or left, or spinning or rotating.

We are "Flat Earth Believers", not "Flat Earth Society Believers".It is already created by CIA for NASA and one of their aim is confuse.

Earth isin't moving anywhere. Completely stationary. It is an unquestionable truth. In none of physical experiment the movement of the world has been observed in any direction. So it hasen't.

Humans have observed red/blue-shifting of light as the earth moves toward and away from stars, which means that the stars are moving away toward or away from Earth at high enough speeds (we're talking 10+ miles per second, 36,000+ miles per hour) to compress the light waves emitted from the object.  This means that, given a stationary Earth, the stars must be exactly as far away as astronomers have observed.  Does this align with common belief of FE'ers?

If the sun and other celestial objects are as close to Earth as I've heard (keep in mind I haven't heard that much) then wouldn't they have crashed into the Earth several minutes after Earth started existing?  Keep in mind that redshift/blueshift is observable, measurable, and exists in ways that do not require scientific knowledge/equipment.  The doppler effect is the same phenomenon using sound waves (waves none the less). 

From what I've read, in the FE model "gravity" is caused by earth moving upwards in a constant rate.
But if space doesn't exist, what does earth "move upwards" in?
In the RE theory space exists and earth moves through space in an orbit around the sun. But if earth is all there is and nothing exists outside of earth as FET suggests, then how can earth move upwards through nothing?

That's only one model, UA.  Another is denpressure.  The flash card version of this is that it is atmospheric pressure which holds us and everything else to the ground.  In that model there is no upward acceleration.
Dual earth has another theory but I can't quite remember it.  I have asked JR for an explaination as this theory is his working model.  If I recall correctly it has to do with aether, which is essentially space, moving and pushing us down, but I could be off on that one.

Quote from: İntikam on March 22, 2017, 01:43:44 AM

Earth isin't moving anywhere. Completely stationary. It is an unquestionable truth. In none of physical experiment the movement of the world has been observed in any direction. So it hasen't.

Humans have observed red/blue-shifting of light as the earth moves toward and away from stars, which means that the stars are moving away toward or away from Earth at high enough speeds (we're talking 10+ miles per second, 36,000+ miles per hour) to compress the light waves emitted from the object.  This means that, given a stationary Earth, the stars must be exactly as far away as astronomers have observed.  Does this align with common belief of FE'ers?

If the sun and other celestial objects are as close to Earth as I've heard (keep in mind I haven't heard that much) then wouldn't they have crashed into the Earth several minutes after Earth started existing?  Keep in mind that redshift/blueshift is observable, measurable, and exists in ways that do not require scientific knowledge/equipment.  The doppler effect is the same phenomenon using sound waves (waves none the less). 

You should research Tired Light Theory.  Not everything is black or white.