Hi everyone.
I'm new to this forum, but I've been reading your topics a lot for a few months now, and I think I came up with something that might really be useful to all the FE community.
Before I get into the subject, I'd like to apologize in advance if I make mistakes with grammar or such, English is not my first language, for I'm french.
Now let's get into it.
As the title says, I probably came up with THE ultimate FE model that might actually settle things for good.
I've been struggling a lot with FE models, all their different and contradicting facts and explanations, and during my personal research about the subject, a few things finally became clear.
The first thing really driving me nuts and which I had a hard time to explain with flat Earth was the existence of two celestial poles.
After reading a lot of the REs answers to a lot of topics, and checking their facts, I had to admit that indeed, around 15% of the world's population lived in the Southern Hemisphere, and could observe the stars at will, making it hard to deny existence of said celestial poles, as seen there for the southern one :
So I turned myself to FE models such as the Bipolar Earth Model and DET, which could explain those two poles, but unfortunately, it only raised a new question.
I found out that around the Equator, apparently, people can witness both hemispheres stars revolving sideways compared to them, as can be seen there :
http://sguisard.astrosurf.com/Pagim/From_pole_to_pole.htmlOf course, as a lot of people live around the Equator too, it's quite hard to deny that without denying the very existence of said people.
Now the real issue with those models is that if I took two discs, and stood somewhere on the area where they join, I wouldn't see stars revolving this way for sure, I'd rather see them getting closer and further away from the discs junctions (and so from me) as they rotate around their own respective celestial poles which would look fixed to me.
Please someone correct me if I'm wrong about these facts about stars, it's important to understand what led me to the construction of the upcoming model.
So the thing is, if I stood on the "equator" of any of those discs, but at the opposite side compared to their junction, so the far edge side, I would see only one of the two discs' stars right ?
Unfortunately, everywhere around the Equator, same phenomenon can be observed, stars revolving "sideways" if I may say so.
As a good flat Earth researcher, taking example on some of our greatest FES members here, I told myself "there must be a way around this !", because, I mean, there obviously is, earth being flat. Saying otherwise would be utterly ridiculous, right ?
I was still sticking with a two-sided / two-faced, or whatever you want to call it Earth, then came to my mind this important notion of tangent :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TangentBasically, and please stop me if I'm wrong, (because I went through literary courses, so geometry is not my best perk), but as I understand it, on a circle or a sphere, there always is a small surface that can be considered as "flat".
Meaning, the larger the object, the larger the "apparent flat surface" (this being relative to an observer).
Now, comparing flat Earth's size to a human being, it might be normal we don't see such small curve, as those globeheads actually pretend (I'll give you that one, GHs...).
All of this leads me to picture flat Earth this way :
Imagine both discs, but they're not totally flat, ok ? A bit curved, like, let's say, two bowls :
But you gotta know that those bowls are so mind-fudgingly huge that their curve is basically equal to 0 if you take a tiny surface on any one of them, just scale that surface to the surface an average human being might take on flat earth (if it's not infinite, which, imho, it is absolutely not, for this seems as absurd as the globe theory we've been fed by reptilian masonists and NASA shills).
Now, I want you people to mentally picture those two bowls (let's call them "hemispheridiscs" at this point), and imagine them joined by their equators.
Now we have a flat Earth fitting all observations. Stars can indeed revolve sideways when seen from anywhere around the Equator, we can predict the sun and moon's positions, etc, as we would obtain something like this :
It can even explain satellites orbiting those curved hemispherical discs (it also takes into account the whole structure is rotating once a day), so you know what, globe heads, I'll even give you "gravity" as I can't explain myself why it couldn't work and can't deny things would fall at 9.8m/s, but based on the notion of tangent, whatever you shills will come up with, fact is :
Earth is FLAT "_____________________" !
I call this model the "Dual Hemispheridiscal Tangential Earth", but name might be subject to changes in the future, as research is never finished, and I might improve my model based on new evidences I find.
So, here, I wanna say it :
NAILED IT ! Big time.
Are you salty, globe earthers ? Ahahahahahahahaha ! Yeah, earth is flat by definition, damn it, whatever shape you want it to be !
To conlude this expose, I would most of all like to thank my fellow flat Earth researchers, whoever came up with the Bipolar Earth Model and the Dual Earth Model helped me a lot.
And of course, it would be ungrateful of me to forget physicalobserver, whose dedication to the cause inspired me, always standing still in the storm of adversity, and my friend Intikam who helped me a lot with the whole idea and the final design of the model.
(Even though original idea is mine, don't forget that, Inti. I agreed with giving you the credit you deserve, but don't go on and try to steal the spotlight from me here, okay ? After all you weren't so hot for the "Full equatorial junction" hypothesis which could make this work.)
I wish you all a good day, and I would be glad to hear any suggestions about my model, so I can correct any flaw it might have.
I'll be glad to engage in further debate on other topics !
Best regards to you all.
DISCLAIMER : I'm obviously taking no credit for the video, link and pictures shown in this post, they just reflect my views, but are not my product or property.