Your message is a spectacle of ineptness laced with your usual lack of homework, a combination not calculated to swell the RE ranks.
but since the Sagnac effect is dependent on the angular velocityPlease update your knowledge on the catastrophic hypotheses put forward by N. Ashby (the main proponent of your idea):
http://www.tuks.nl/pdf/Reference_Material/Ronald_Hatch/Hatch-Clock_Behavior_and_theSearch_for_an_Underlying_Mechanism_for_Relativistic_Phenomena_2002.pdfhttp://www.tuks.nl/pdf/Reference_Material/Ronald_Hatch/Hatch-Relativity_and_GPS-II_1995.pdfThe missing orbital Sagnac effect is absolutely proven by the conclusions of the RUDERFER experiment of 1961.
In one of the most intriguing experiments of the 20th century, Martin Ruderfer proved mathematically and experimentally, using the spinning Mossbauer effect, the FIRST NULL RESULT in ether drift theory (1961).
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=66858.msg1784179#msg1784179 (also includes the references on the Ives experiment, a hexagonal closed path Sagnac effect)
A GPS satellite orbiting the Earth, while at the same time the entire system is orbiting the Sun, IS A LARGE SCALE SPINNING MOSSBAUER EXPERIMENT.
Given the very fact that these GPS satellites DO NOT record the orbital Sagnac effect, means that THE HYPOTHESES OF THE RUDERFER EXPERIMENT ARE FULFILLED.
Why is there no requirement for a Sagnac correction due to the earth’s orbital motion? Like the transit time in the spinning Mossbauer experiments, any such effect would be completely canceled by the orbital-velocity effect on the satellite clocks.
However, indirectly, the counteracting effects of the transit time and clock slowing induced biases indicate that an ether drift is present. This is because there is independent evidence that clocks are slowed as a result of their speed. Thus,
ether drift must exist or else the clock slowing effect would be observed.
Believe it or not, most scientists have begun to give up on the theory of relativity, as it no longer can explain the spinning Mossbauer effect encountered in the GPS satellites.
THE LATEST VIEWPOINT in cosmology today is this: MLET (Modified Lorentz Ether Theory).
THIS IS THE LAST STAND of the RE scientists.
Let me explain.
A modified Lorentz ether is a TRANSLATIONAL ETHER: that is, it surrounds the Earth like an envelope, but does NOT rotate along with the Earth around its own axis; while at the same time it travels WITH the Earth in its orbit around the Sun.
In this way, the orbital Sagnac spinning Mossbauer effect could be explained by this translational ether.
HOWEVER, there is no such thing as MLET.
None other than Dr. Hans Zweig (Stanford University) has exposed the fallacies inherent in Lorentz' approach:
The colossal mistakes committed by Lorentz and Einstein in deriving the Lorentz transformation/factor:
http://relativityunraveled.net/chapter-4-the-michelson-morley-experiment/http://relativityunraveled.net/chapter-5-the-lorentz-transformation/http://relativityunraveled.net/chapter-1-introduction/Dr. Hans Zweig, Stanford University:
http://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/wiki/hans-j-zweig/MLET (Modified Lorentz Ether Theory) is based on the Lorentz transformation (Lorentz factor/contraction), and as such, is equally invalid.
http://www.gsjournal.net/old/weuro/agathan5.pdfAnd things don't stop here.
In addition to the fact that GPS satellites do not record the orbital Sagnac effect, we have an even greater problem: the GPS clocks DO NOT RECORD the Sun's gravitational potential.
It is assumed that the orbital velocity of the Earth as it orbits the Sun is a variable; however, the GPS clocks show that the this velocity MUST BE CONSTANT, as it does not record the Sun's gravitational potential effect upon these clocks.
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg1782182#msg1782182https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg1784780#msg1784780In GPS the actual magnitude of the Sagnac correction
due to earth’s rotation depends on the positions of
satellites and receiver and a typical value is 30 m, as the
propagation time is about 0.1s and the linear speed due
to earth’s rotation is about 464 m/s at the equator. The
GPS provides an accuracy of about 10 m or better in positioning.
Thus the precision of GPS will be degraded significantly,
if the Sagnac correction due to earth’s rotation
is not taken into account.
On the other hand, the orbital
motion of the earth around the sun has a linear speed of
about 30 km/s which is about 100 times that of earth’s
rotation. Thus the present high-precision GPS would be
entirely impossible if the omitted correction due to orbital
motion is really necessary.In an intercontinental microwave link between Japan and
the USA via a geostationary satellite as relay, the influence
of earth’s rotation is also demonstrated in a high-precision
time comparison between the atomic clocks at two remote
ground stations.
In this transpacific-link experiment, a synchronization
error of as large as about 0.3 µs was observed unexpectedly.
Meanwhile, as in GPS, no effects of earth’s orbital motion
are reported in these links, although they would be
easier to observe if they are in existence. Thereby, it is evident
that the wave propagation in GPS or the intercontinental
microwave link depends on the earth’s rotation, but
is entirely independent of earth’s orbital motion around
the sun or whatever. As a consequence, the propagation
mechanism in GPS or intercontinental link can be viewed
as classical in conjunction with an ECI frame, rather than
the ECEF or any other frame, being selected as the unique
propagation frame. In other words, the wave in GPS or the
intercontinental microwave link can be viewed as propagating
via a classical medium stationary in a geocentric
inertial frame.
http://qem.ee.nthu.edu.tw/f1a.pdfThen how can a 635 m diameter sun contain enough energy to last, however many years, or even maintain any sort of fusion reaction, let alone a CNO cycle? Ether fusion explained:
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg1831695#msg1831695But the Sun DOES NOT use a fusion type reactor to produce energy: the subquarks/positrons provided by the Black Sun are constantly being used by the Sun to create quarks, and to activate thermal strings of the atmospheric/telluric subquark waves. The Sun has a constant supply of energy coming from the Black Sun.