iWitness - Air Pressure and Weight

  • 411 Replies
  • 101464 Views
*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: iWitness - Air Pressure and Weight
« Reply #270 on: August 09, 2016, 01:06:01 AM »
Why do you think you are infallible? You yourself have claimed that denpressure cannot be disproven. What makes you so sure?

Can you not see that you are also in denial? You reject literally thousands of individuals from all over the world. Why do you think you are so superior?

I have reasons why I reject the denpressure model. You have met my reasoning with abject denial without reason. Why do you think everybody is lying to you?
I don't think EVERYBODY'S lying to me. I understand that many are simply too arrogant to change their indoctrinated stance. I know that many are extremely gullible and naive.
I know that many will be pondering what I'm saying but would rather not come into it because they fear ridicule and bullying by those that get extremely irate and irrational. Like you.

Then there's the liars and fibbers, or story telling sci-fi writers that probably don't see what they do as telling lies. They maybe see it as portraying something to the minds of those that want an alternate reality but can only have the concept of it through fantasy mind bending/brainwashing.

*

TheRealBillNye

  • 1224
  • +0/-0
Re: iWitness - Air Pressure and Weight
« Reply #271 on: August 09, 2016, 01:33:36 AM »
Where have I ever been irate? I am very interested in why you continue to suggest denpressure is without error. I want to know why you reject thousands of scientific papers without even reading the abstracts. You reject any new knowledge because you are afraid it may alter your narrow mindview.

I have demonstrated a working knowledge of the denpressure model. Can you say the same about the RE model? How can you choose which one to believe if you reject all data that disagrees with you?

With every post you prove yourself to be an egotistically unscientific person. No sane person would think themselves infallible.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: iWitness - Air Pressure and Weight
« Reply #272 on: August 09, 2016, 01:59:16 AM »
Where have I ever been irate? I am very interested in why you continue to suggest denpressure is without error. I want to know why you reject thousands of scientific papers without even reading the abstracts. You reject any new knowledge because you are afraid it may alter your narrow mindview.

I have demonstrated a working knowledge of the denpressure model. Can you say the same about the RE model? How can you choose which one to believe if you reject all data that disagrees with you?

With every post you prove yourself to be an egotistically unscientific person. No sane person would think themselves infallible.
Then stop conversing with me.

*

SpJunk

  • 577
  • +0/-0
Re: iWitness - Air Pressure and Weight
« Reply #273 on: August 09, 2016, 02:01:30 AM »
I don't think EVERYBODY'S lying to me. I understand that many are simply too arrogant to change their indoctrinated stance. I know that many are extremely gullible and naive.
I know that many will be pondering what I'm saying but would rather not come into it because they fear ridicule and bullying by those that get extremely irate and irrational. Like you.

Then there's the liars and fibbers, or story telling sci-fi writers that probably don't see what they do as telling lies. They maybe see it as portraying something to the minds of those that want an alternate reality but can only have the concept of it through fantasy mind bending/brainwashing.

In real life Flat Earth model has serious flaws.
South of the equator navigation by Flat Model is impossible. Real positions of celestial bodies are totally different.

Being much older than Round Earth model, FEM should develop much more consistency by now.
It didn't. As soon as big enough part of the world was discovered, Flat model was abandoned for practical use, as worthless.

Ancient Greeks had two options: flat Earth and close Sun, or round Earth and far Sun.
Do you think they were stupid? They noted that if Sun is close, then it would shrink in appearance
when going away from observer from noon to afternoon and sunset.
Since it doesn't, they saw that the Sun is "already too far away for that".

Geodesy actually MEASURED curvature long before NASA.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_geodesy

Church never claimed the Earth is Flat.
They said it is Static.
Those are two diferent things.
Church claimed that Sun and planets revolve around Earth.
Galileo used telescope to observe movement of celestial bodies,
and calculated that actually, Earth and other planets revolve around Sun.
His followers used that to attack Dogma (and Church),
so Galileo was put on trial, where he was forced to abandon his teachings.
Hence the words attributed to him after the trial "eppur si muove" ("and yet it moves").

What do you think why Flat Earth model for Sun behavior has to invent such weird optics,
which falls apart as soon as you include more than one observer from different parts of the world?
Why some Flat Earthers select only convenient facts to prove the Earth is flat,
and everything that disproves it they twist, or ridicule, or declare "lies and conspiracies"?
For example, every video that shows midnight sun on south pole they call "fake".

On globe model everything works well.

~~~~~

In Reply #210 (page 8 ) in this thread I offered easy and cheap practical way to check out if gravity exists.
If it does, why you need Air Pressure to make things fall towards floor?

If it doesn't, what pulls air down to make pressure in the first place?
The same thing that pulls air, pulls everything else together with it as well.

Air itself presses thing from below, not only from above.
And having pressure dependent on depth / height, pressure from below is slightly bigger.
Things will in air lose part of their weight by the same principle things lose some weight in water.
Only in water the weight loss is bigger, because of difference in density.
"If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts." - Albert Einstein

"Your lack of simplicity is main reason why not many people would bother to try to understand you." - S.M.

*

TheRealBillNye

  • 1224
  • +0/-0
Re: iWitness - Air Pressure and Weight
« Reply #274 on: August 09, 2016, 02:04:45 AM »
Never. I will continue to refute your points one by one until you leave this site in shame.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: iWitness - Air Pressure and Weight
« Reply #275 on: August 09, 2016, 02:11:57 AM »
I don't think EVERYBODY'S lying to me. I understand that many are simply too arrogant to change their indoctrinated stance. I know that many are extremely gullible and naive.
I know that many will be pondering what I'm saying but would rather not come into it because they fear ridicule and bullying by those that get extremely irate and irrational. Like you.

Then there's the liars and fibbers, or story telling sci-fi writers that probably don't see what they do as telling lies. They maybe see it as portraying something to the minds of those that want an alternate reality but can only have the concept of it through fantasy mind bending/brainwashing.

In real life Flat Earth model has serious flaws.
South of the equator navigation by Flat Model is impossible. Real positions of celestial bodies are totally different.

Being much older than Round Earth model, FEM should develop much more consistency by now.
It didn't. As soon as big enough part of the world was discovered, Flat model was abandoned for practical use, as worthless.

Ancient Greeks had two options: flat Earth and close Sun, or round Earth and far Sun.
Do you think they were stupid? They noted that if Sun is close, then it would shrink in appearance
when going away from observer from noon to afternoon and sunset.
Since it doesn't, they saw that the Sun is "already too far away for that".

Geodesy actually MEASURED curvature long before NASA.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_geodesy

Church never claimed the Earth is Flat.
They said it is Static.
Those are two diferent things.
Church claimed that Sun and planets revolve around Earth.
Galileo used telescope to observe movement of celestial bodies,
and calculated that actually, Earth and other planets revolve around Sun.
His followers used that to attack Dogma (and Church),
so Galileo was put on trial, where he was forced to abandon his teachings.
Hence the words attributed to him after the trial "eppur si muove" ("and yet it moves").

What do you think why Flat Earth model for Sun behavior has to invent such weird optics,
which falls apart as soon as you include more than one observer from different parts of the world?
Why some Flat Earthers select only convenient facts to prove the Earth is flat,
and everything that disproves it they twist, or ridicule, or declare "lies and conspiracies"?
For example, every video that shows midnight sun on south pole they call "fake".

On globe model everything works well.

~~~~~

In Reply #210 (page 8 ) in this thread I offered easy and cheap practical way to check out if gravity exists.
If it does, why you need Air Pressure to make things fall towards floor?

If it doesn't, what pulls air down to make pressure in the first place?
The same thing that pulls air, pulls everything else together with it as well.

Air itself presses thing from below, not only from above.
And having pressure dependent on depth / height, pressure from below is slightly bigger.
Things will in air lose part of their weight by the same principle things lose some weight in water.
Only in water the weight loss is bigger, because of difference in density.
It'll help you if you read through what's been said.

*

TheRealBillNye

  • 1224
  • +0/-0
Re: iWitness - Air Pressure and Weight
« Reply #276 on: August 09, 2016, 02:15:32 AM »
Scepti why don't you read anything that isn't related to denpressure? I gave you lots of reading material. How could you be so biased as to judge something you refuse to try to understand?

At least I have a working understanding of the theories of denpressure.

What makes you think you are incapable of being wrong?

?

Bitzear

  • 2
  • +0/-0
Re: iWitness - Air Pressure and Weight
« Reply #277 on: August 09, 2016, 02:26:08 AM »
Combines all the knowledge in one place

*

SpJunk

  • 577
  • +0/-0
Re: iWitness - Air Pressure and Weight
« Reply #278 on: August 09, 2016, 02:28:39 AM »
It'll help you if you read through what's been said.

"Help" me how?

Wishfull thinking about "there is no pull"?

"Compressed molecules" without any force that will compress them?
What will stop them from simply scatter around thousands of years ago?
Higher molecules will press lower ones, and lower molecules will not push higher ones away?
Without force to pull them towards surface they will just float there without pressing anything.
Like soap bubbles.
Like boiled and peeled eggs in water.
Or vinegar.

So, reading inconsistent things like that again in dosens of posts will "help me",
and you are afraid of understandin one or two things that, for a change,
would require you to read one or two posts written by someone other than you?
"If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts." - Albert Einstein

"Your lack of simplicity is main reason why not many people would bother to try to understand you." - S.M.

*

TheRealBillNye

  • 1224
  • +0/-0
Re: iWitness - Air Pressure and Weight
« Reply #279 on: August 09, 2016, 02:34:12 AM »
In his model, the particles at the very top of the stack simply freeze into a dome, providing resistance to the upward force of the stack.

He fails to realize the fact that this cannot happen. Hydrogen and helium must be kept at very high pressures in order to maintain a shape consistent with this model.

Not to mention the fact that helium must be kept at less than 1 degree above absolute zero to maintain solid form.

He rejects all of these facts as lies and deceit, so that his fragile "theory" remains intact, but only within his own mind.

*

Bom Tishop

  • 11249
  • +12/-7
  • Official friend boy of the FES!!
Re: iWitness - Air Pressure and Weight
« Reply #280 on: August 09, 2016, 02:48:32 AM »
Never. I will continue to refute your points one by one until you leave this site in shame.

WOW!!! And so it has been spoken!!
Quote from: Bom Tishop
LordDave is quite alright even for a bleeding heart liberal. Godspeed good sir

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: iWitness - Air Pressure and Weight
« Reply #281 on: August 09, 2016, 04:21:32 AM »
Never. I will continue to refute your points one by one until you leave this site in shame.
Leaving the site could happen. Leaving it in shame will never happen.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: iWitness - Air Pressure and Weight
« Reply #282 on: August 09, 2016, 04:23:48 AM »
It'll help you if you read through what's been said.

"Help" me how?

Wishfull thinking about "there is no pull"?

"Compressed molecules" without any force that will compress them?
What will stop them from simply scatter around thousands of years ago?
Higher molecules will press lower ones, and lower molecules will not push higher ones away?
Without force to pull them towards surface they will just float there without pressing anything.
Like soap bubbles.
Like boiled and peeled eggs in water.
Or vinegar.

So, reading inconsistent things like that again in dosens of posts will "help me",
and you are afraid of understandin one or two things that, for a change,
would require you to read one or two posts written by someone other than you?
The fact that you rant on and on without even thinking on it, means you have zero chance of understanding it.

Come back when you're a bit calmer and willing to try to understand.

*

rabinoz

  • 26528
  • +0/-0
  • Real Earth Believer
Re: iWitness - Air Pressure and Weight
« Reply #283 on: August 09, 2016, 05:47:42 AM »
How does Air Pressure cause weight?

It would have saved a lot of time if someone had simply answered the question
"How does Air Pressure cause weight?"
with a simple categorical "Air pressure does not cause weight".

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: iWitness - Air Pressure and Weight
« Reply #284 on: August 09, 2016, 05:53:08 AM »
How does Air Pressure cause weight?

It would have saved a lot of time if someone had simply answered the question
"How does Air Pressure cause weight?"
with a simple categorical "Air pressure does not cause weight".
But that wouldn't be a truthful answer.

*

SpJunk

  • 577
  • +0/-0
Re: iWitness - Air Pressure and Weight
« Reply #285 on: August 09, 2016, 06:48:33 AM »
The fact that you rant on and on without even thinking on it, means you have zero chance of understanding it.

Come back when you're a bit calmer and willing to try to understand.

Oh, I understood much better than you would like me to.

Go back to that video with scale in vacuum chamber.

Tell me how much the weight changed in reality.

How much that weight SHOULD change in your theory?

How big is the difference?

Dare you to do it.
"If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts." - Albert Einstein

"Your lack of simplicity is main reason why not many people would bother to try to understand you." - S.M.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: iWitness - Air Pressure and Weight
« Reply #286 on: August 09, 2016, 06:51:34 AM »
The fact that you rant on and on without even thinking on it, means you have zero chance of understanding it.

Come back when you're a bit calmer and willing to try to understand.

Oh, I understood much better than you would like me to.

Go back to that video with scale in vacuum chamber.

Tell me how much the weight changed in reality.

How much that weight SHOULD change in your theory?

How big is the difference?

Dare you to do it.
How about you get a chamber and evacuate it all and follow my experiments to the letter. Are you game?

*

SpJunk

  • 577
  • +0/-0
Re: iWitness - Air Pressure and Weight
« Reply #287 on: August 09, 2016, 07:13:36 AM »

Oh, I understood much better than you would like me to.

Go back to that video with scale in vacuum chamber.

Tell me how much the weight changed in reality.

How much that weight SHOULD change in your theory?

How big is the difference?

Dare you to do it.

 How about you get a chamber and evacuate it all and follow my experiments to the letter. Are you game?


Ok, teel me the letter.
Let's both do it together, and compare the results.
"If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts." - Albert Einstein

"Your lack of simplicity is main reason why not many people would bother to try to understand you." - S.M.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: iWitness - Air Pressure and Weight
« Reply #288 on: August 09, 2016, 07:58:34 AM »

Oh, I understood much better than you would like me to.

Go back to that video with scale in vacuum chamber.

Tell me how much the weight changed in reality.

How much that weight SHOULD change in your theory?

How big is the difference?

Dare you to do it.

 How about you get a chamber and evacuate it all and follow my experiments to the letter. Are you game?


Ok, teel me the letter.
Let's both do it together, and compare the results.
Show me your set up.

*

SpJunk

  • 577
  • +0/-0
Re: iWitness - Air Pressure and Weight
« Reply #289 on: August 09, 2016, 08:09:17 AM »

Oh, I understood much better than you would like me to.

Go back to that video with scale in vacuum chamber.

Tell me how much the weight changed in reality.

How much that weight SHOULD change in your theory?

How big is the difference?

Dare you to do it.

 How about you get a chamber and evacuate it all and follow my experiments to the letter. Are you game?


Ok, teel me the letter.
Let's both do it together, and compare the results.
Show me your set up.
I will as soon as I get the chamber.

For now I have INSTEN digital scale of 1000g capacity and 0.1g resolution, bought at Staples for $12.5.
"If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts." - Albert Einstein

"Your lack of simplicity is main reason why not many people would bother to try to understand you." - S.M.

?

inquisitive

  • 5108
  • +0/-0
Re: iWitness - Air Pressure and Weight
« Reply #290 on: August 09, 2016, 08:49:04 AM »
How does Air Pressure cause weight?

It would have saved a lot of time if someone had simply answered the question
"How does Air Pressure cause weight?"
with a simple categorical "Air pressure does not cause weight".
But that wouldn't be a truthful answer.
If air pressure causes weight then why does it not vary with the daily changes in atmospheric pressure?

*

SpJunk

  • 577
  • +0/-0
Re: iWitness - Air Pressure and Weight
« Reply #291 on: August 09, 2016, 09:24:20 AM »
How does Air Pressure cause weight?

It would have saved a lot of time if someone had simply answered the question
"How does Air Pressure cause weight?"
with a simple categorical "Air pressure does not cause weight".
But that wouldn't be a truthful answer.
If air pressure causes weight then why does it not vary with the daily changes in atmospheric pressure?

Take one aluminum cube exactly 1 decimeter in size.
Take another lead cube, also exactly 1 decimeter in size.
Air doesn't penetrate either.
Only surface pressure.
Same volumes, asme surface areas.
On same area there is same air pressure.

And yet,
aluminum cube weighs 2.70 kilograms
and lead cube 11.36 kilograms.
"If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts." - Albert Einstein

"Your lack of simplicity is main reason why not many people would bother to try to understand you." - S.M.

*

TheRealBillNye

  • 1224
  • +0/-0
Re: iWitness - Air Pressure and Weight
« Reply #292 on: August 09, 2016, 11:32:36 AM »

Take one aluminum cube exactly 1 decimeter in size.
Take another lead cube, also exactly 1 decimeter in size.
Air doesn't penetrate either.
Only surface pressure.
Same volumes, asme surface areas.
On same area there is same air pressure.

And yet,
aluminum cube weighs 2.70 kilograms
and lead cube 11.36 kilograms.

He will claim that air does in fact penetrate aluminum. This is impossible because then aluminum air tanks would be constantly leaky.

*

TheRealBillNye

  • 1224
  • +0/-0
Re: iWitness - Air Pressure and Weight
« Reply #293 on: August 09, 2016, 12:29:43 PM »
Never. I will continue to refute your points one by one until you leave this site in shame.
Leaving the site could happen. Leaving it in shame will never happen.

If you feel no shame for thinking yourself some kind of omnipresent God, then the rest of us will feel shame for you.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: iWitness - Air Pressure and Weight
« Reply #294 on: August 09, 2016, 12:38:21 PM »

Take one aluminum cube exactly 1 decimeter in size.
Take another lead cube, also exactly 1 decimeter in size.
Air doesn't penetrate either.
Only surface pressure.
Same volumes, asme surface areas.
On same area there is same air pressure.

And yet,
aluminum cube weighs 2.70 kilograms
and lead cube 11.36 kilograms.

He will claim that air does in fact penetrate aluminum. This is impossible because then aluminum air tanks would be constantly leaky.
You people call it atomic mass but it;s simply saturation or porousity of metals or whatever.

Tell me something. Why does a balloon stretch and what is happening as it does stretch as opposed to it being deflated?

*

TheRealBillNye

  • 1224
  • +0/-0
Re: iWitness - Air Pressure and Weight
« Reply #295 on: August 09, 2016, 12:46:58 PM »
If aluminum is "porous or saturated or whatever" (very defined, scientific terminology btw)  how can it form a sealed tank?

*

TheRealBillNye

  • 1224
  • +0/-0
Re: iWitness - Air Pressure and Weight
« Reply #296 on: August 09, 2016, 12:52:12 PM »
Then there's the liars and fibbers, or story telling sci-fi writers that probably don't see what they do as telling lies. They maybe see it as portraying something to the minds of those that want an alternate reality but can only have the concept of it through fantasy mind bending/brainwashing.

How do we know that you are not lying?

At least the dogmatic propaganda machine known as "Modern Science" has repeatable, verifiable exeriments. Can you say the same?

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: iWitness - Air Pressure and Weight
« Reply #297 on: August 09, 2016, 12:58:50 PM »
If aluminum is "porous or saturated or whatever" (very defined, scientific terminology btw)  how can it form a sealed tank?
Because the tank is not a porous tea bag. The atmosphere is already trapped within the metal.
The molecules trapped in the metal are much smaller than the atmospheric or water molecules that are up against the tank, so it stays air tight as we perceive it.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: iWitness - Air Pressure and Weight
« Reply #298 on: August 09, 2016, 01:01:55 PM »
Then there's the liars and fibbers, or story telling sci-fi writers that probably don't see what they do as telling lies. They maybe see it as portraying something to the minds of those that want an alternate reality but can only have the concept of it through fantasy mind bending/brainwashing.

How do we know that you are not lying?

At least the dogmatic propaganda machine known as "Modern Science" has repeatable, verifiable exeriments. Can you say the same?
You won't  know if I'm lying or not until you can understand what I'm saying and you honestly are clearly not understanding anything, even after all this time.
Hand waving and screaming will not hasten your absorption of what I'm saying. You really have to want to take it in instead of fighting against it, without actually knowing what you're fighting against.

*

TheRealBillNye

  • 1224
  • +0/-0
Re: iWitness - Air Pressure and Weight
« Reply #299 on: August 09, 2016, 01:07:34 PM »
I am not hand waving or screaming. I am simply asking normal questions. I have heard all your theories. I have demonstrated the fact that I can clearly articulate your theories to others. Yet you still claim"You know nothing, Jon Snow." What exactly am I still missing?