The ISS is a Gulfstream jet.

If you have a proper telescope

'A proper telescope'?

Is that a technical term?

Did you learn it at your cat-free 'aerospace engineering college'?

Same as you learnt technical terms like this:

you ignorant fuck.

You're really missing that cat aintcha, Sir Liesalot?

Quote from: Blue_Moon on May 11, 2016, 01:50:16 PM

If you have a proper telescope

'A proper telescope'?

Is that a technical term?

Did you learn it at your cat-free 'aerospace engineering college'?

Same as you learnt technical terms like this:

Quote from: Blue_Moon on May 11, 2016, 01:31:37 PM

you ignorant fuck.

You're really missing that cat aintcha, Sir Liesalot?

No, now that it's summer, I get all the pussy I want. 

And I know you can't handle technical terms if they are being used to prove you wrong, so I dumbed it down.  You ignorant fuck. 

You stopped using technical terms because I showed you did not understand them.

No real aerospace engineers believe NASA's bullshit.

That's why they have to invent 'experts' like the fictitious John Schilling character...

Have you heard of him?

Whatever; looky da pikcha of da ISS!

]

You stopped using technical terms because I showed you did not understand them.

No real aerospace engineers believe NASA's bullshit.

That's why they have to invent 'experts' like the fictitious John Schilling character...

Have you heard of him?

Whatever; looky da pikcha of da ISS!

]

You can post the same "pikcha" all you want; you're not convincing anyone.  Why should we believe a paranoid asshole like you? 

You can post the same "pikcha" all you want; you're not convincing anyone.

Well you won't mind if I do just that then, will you Sir Shillalot?

Why should we believe a paranoid asshole like you? 

More technical terms you learnt from your 'friends at NASA'?

Is John Schilling among them, by any chance?

Whatever; ladies & gentlemen; the ISS:

Quote from: Blue_Moon on May 14, 2016, 01:27:34 PM

You can post the same "pikcha" all you want; you're not convincing anyone.

Well you won't mind if I do just that then, will you Sir Shillalot?

Quote from: Blue_Moon on May 14, 2016, 01:27:34 PM

Why should we believe a paranoid asshole like you? 

More technical terms you learnt from your 'friends at NASA'?

Is John Schilling among them, by any chance?

Whatever; ladies & gentlemen; the ISS:

Because misinterpreting the same photo ad nauseum is the best way to make a point, and insults>facts. 

Quote from: Papa Legba on May 14, 2016, 11:06:23 PM

Quote from: Blue_Moon on May 14, 2016, 01:27:34 PM

You can post the same "pikcha" all you want; you're not convincing anyone.

Well you won't mind if I do just that then, will you Sir Shillalot?

Quote from: Blue_Moon on May 14, 2016, 01:27:34 PM

Why should we believe a paranoid asshole like you? 

More technical terms you learnt from your 'friends at NASA'?

Is John Schilling among them, by any chance?

Whatever; ladies & gentlemen; the ISS:

Because misinterpreting the same photo ad nauseum is the best way to make a point, and insults>facts.

BUUUTTT.....There is a 3....explain that shill!!!

Quote from: jroa on May 09, 2016, 06:33:39 PM

Quote from: Blue_Moon on May 09, 2016, 06:30:28 PM

NASA releases huge amounts of verifiable public-domain data that also matches third-party observations, and its structure is set up to where a hoax is wholly unfeasible.

Are you saying that NASA has never been caught lying, cheating, or manipulating data?

Not as a whole, they haven't.  Any organization can have small-scale outlying corruption or mismanagement.  I don't think anybody will argue that.  But that is also a reason that there cannot be a huge unified top-secret conspiracy.  Among the outlying cases, there would be whistle-blowing and blackmailing.  Good luck trying to hide the earth's shape from thousands of highly-qualified professionals whose life's work is to know the orbits and functions of satellites.  And when a thruster gets stuck open and your satellite gets stuck in the wrong aether current that doesn't match a Kepler orbit, good luck getting help from the contractor responsible without setting off any alarms.  Can you imagine how hurt they would be if they found out they had been lied to from the start about something as basic as the shape of the earth?  There would definitely be quite a few whistle-blowers.  But there aren't any.  Not one employee of NASA or any of its many contractors, or any of the other space agencies or their contractors. 
So we're left with a choice:  Either
A.) NASA has the best indoctrination program in the history of mankind, so that even the disgruntled employees and the people who fail the program still carry the secret to the grave, or
B.) There is no all-encompassing conspiracy, NASA has nothing to hide, and (gasp) you still have more to learn about physics and engineering.

While not a FEr, I do have to disagree with you Blue Moon regarding to the subject of whistleblowers. I know the links I provided are still hearsay and conjecture, in context to your argument. I would still like to implore you to re-think the subject of whistleblowers. Not necessarily in context to NASA, just in general.

" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

http://www.activistpost.com/2016/03/watch-computer-programmer-testifies-under-oath-he-coded-computers-to-rig-elections.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_whistleblowers

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/afghanistan/8070253/Wikileaks-10-greatest-stories.html

http://cs.stanford.edu/people/eroberts/cs201/projects/2010-11/WikiLeaks/online.html

To the subject of the thread, the evidence seems to lean against the subject of the thread.

There's no possible way the ISS we've seen could fit in there, come up with a better conspiracy.

Stop posting the same thing over and over again, it only proves you can't debate your ideas.

Because misinterpreting the same photo ad nauseum is the best way to make a point, and insults>facts.

STFU & tell us if you've met tippety-toppety sshpayze-rokkit enjynerring eckspurt John Schilling, Sir Liesalot.

Big name in your field allegedly...

Post #1000! I just had to...

Quote from: Blue_Moon on May 15, 2016, 11:47:15 AM

Because misinterpreting the same photo ad nauseum is the best way to make a point, and insults>facts.

STFU & tell us if you've met tippety-toppety sshpayze-rokkit enjynerring eckspurt John Schilling, Sir Liesalot.

Big name in your field allegedly...

You mean the guy from Silverbird Astronautics?  Of course not.  Have you ever met Tim Bolen?

While not a FEr, I do have to disagree with you Blue Moon regarding to the subject of whistleblowers. I know the links I provided are still hearsay and conjecture, in context to your argument. I would still like to implore you to re-think the subject of whistleblowers. Not necessarily in context to NASA, just in general.

" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

http://www.activistpost.com/2016/03/watch-computer-programmer-testifies-under-oath-he-coded-computers-to-rig-elections.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_whistleblowers

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/afghanistan/8070253/Wikileaks-10-greatest-stories.html

http://cs.stanford.edu/people/eroberts/cs201/projects/2010-11/WikiLeaks/online.html

To the subject of the thread, the evidence seems to lean against the subject of the thread.

So you are saying that you agree what Legba has presented?

As for blue-moon, he has alot of good info at times, however you need to remember his choice of study and his feelings towards NASA. He will always be biased, and at this point he believes NASA can do no wrong.

I don't blame him I remember when I was early twenties, freshly graduated, wide eyed and bushy tailed. Then I started to pick up on alot of things, realized the world was not what it seemed.

Now not saying the entire NASA organization is a hoax, but they have tons of lies in their vault and they are very very far from the angels they say they are. If I can vouch from personal experience of them, that is shady business practices and using the government as their henchmen/enforcers.

Post #1000! I just had to...

No, that is reply #1000.  The OP is not counted as a reply, so you dad post #1001. 

Quote from: Luke 22:35-38 on April 27, 2016, 02:41:50 PM

You know the definition of insanity is to do the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.

Yes, which is why you should all stop trying to gaslight & brainwash me.

I'm not trying to brainwash you and I'm not sure what you mean by gaslighting but I'm pretty sure I'm not doing that. I'm just stating facts and logic.

Quote from: Luke 22:35-38 on April 27, 2016, 02:41:50 PM

NO spotlight on a aircraft looks like the pod on the bottom.

And you know this how?

Have you seen every design ever manufactured, even classified ones?

I don't need to. Here's a question, how in the world is it going to aim the spotlight? The way it's designs its better suited to shoot bullets rather than a spotlight DOWN to its victims.

Quote

That pod is radar equipment.

And you know this how?

Have you looked inside it in person?

Do you have X-ray eyes like markjo?

I have something better, the Internet.

http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=uavsar&FORM=HDRSC2&PC=APPM

http://airbornescience.jpl.nasa.gov/tags/uavsar

Fact is that pod could easily contain some form of spotlight/projector & you have no way of knowing whether it does or not.

And you have no way of knowing that it does. No wait, yes you do, the Internet. It didnt take too much for me.

You need to work on your strawmen, cannon-fodder kid, cos they fall apart at the seams too easily.

Ther was no straw man.

You mean the guy from Silverbird Astronautics?  Of course not.  Have you ever met Tim Bolen?

Can you find a photo of him then?

Or tell us why his website, www.silverbirdastronautics.com is an empty shell?

And don't you think his name is a doozy - John Schilling?

As for Tim Bolen, his website, www.bolenreport.com is far from an empty shell...

Click on it for JREF lulz folks!

Do you know the JREF-ers want to abolish the age of consent?

And promote the idea that victims of child abuse are just displaying False Memory Syndrome?

For reasons completely unconnected to being a bunch of sick paedos, naturally!

Just like the fact that this forum has recently been overrun with sick freaks all targeting myself & the mods is completely unconnected to the fact I have been pointing things like the above out...

lol.

Quote from: Blue_Moon on May 16, 2016, 04:44:50 PM

You mean the guy from Silverbird Astronautics?  Of course not.  Have you ever met Tim Bolen?

Can you find a photo of him then?

Or tell us why his website, www.silverbirdastronautics.com is an empty shell?

And don't you think his name is a doozy - John Schilling?

As for Tim Bolen, his website, www.bolenreport.com is far from an empty shell...

Click on it for JREF lulz folks!

Do you know the JREF-ers want to abolish the age of consent?

And promote the idea that victims of child abuse are just displaying False Memory Syndrome?

For reasons completely unconnected to being a bunch of sick paedos, naturally!

Just like the fact that this forum has recently been overrun with sick freaks all targeting myself & the mods is completely unconnected to the fact I have been pointing things like the above out...

lol.

Why are you so obsessed with John Schilling?  Is it because of the name?  I don't see him going around directing people to his website.  In fact, I hadn't even heard of him until you started shitspamming his name.  I guess all aerospace engineers with websites must have names like Sarah Sockpuppet or Jack Jref. 

Why are you so obsessed with John Schilling?  Is it because of the name?  I don't see him going around directing people to his website.  In fact, I hadn't even heard of him until you started shitspamming his name.  I guess all aerospace engineers with websites must have names like Sarah Sockpuppet or Jack Jref.

'Shitspamming'?

Hi markjo!

Anyhoo; your inability to find a photo of 'astronautical engineer' John Schilling, or explain why his website is an empty shell, is noted.

I suggest it is because he is a fictitious persona...

Just like you are, in fact.

Why such fictitious personae are required by the 'astronautical engineering' establishment is a good question...

I suggest the answer is because the 'astronautical engineering' establishment is itself mostly fictitious.

And it doesn't take much research to realise this, either.

Toodle-pip, Sir Shillalot!

Quote from: Blue_Moon on May 16, 2016, 11:09:57 PM

Why are you so obsessed with John Schilling?  Is it because of the name?  I don't see him going around directing people to his website.  In fact, I hadn't even heard of him until you started shitspamming his name.  I guess all aerospace engineers with websites must have names like Sarah Sockpuppet or Jack Jref.

'Shitspamming'?

Hi markjo!

Anyhoo; your inability to find a photo of 'astronautical engineer' John Schilling, or explain why his website is an empty shell, is noted.

I suggest it is because he is a fictitious persona...

Just like you are, in fact.

Why such fictitious personae are required by the 'astronautical engineering' establishment is a good question...

I suggest the answer is because the 'astronautical engineering' establishment is itself mostly fictitious.

And it doesn't take much research to realise this, either.

Toodle-pip, Sir Shillalot!

Empty shell, huh?  You must have typed in ".net" instead of ".com".  For a "fictitious persona," he sure spent a lot of time on his resume and Launch Vehicle Performance Calculator. 

Empty shell, huh?  You must have typed in ".net" instead of ".com".  For a "fictitious persona," he sure spent a lot of time on his resume and Launch Vehicle Performance Calculator. 

Are you mental?

His 'resume' is only 2 pages long, how would that take 'a lot of time' to create?

And his 'launch vehicle performance calculator' could be knocked up in a couple of days by any under-employed Indian math-geek, of which there are plenty.

And I did type www.silverbirdastronautics.com the first time; look:

Or tell us why his website, www.silverbirdastronautics.com is an empty shell?

And it is an empty, outdated shell too.

Go read it.

And try to find a photo of John Schilling while you're at it...

Cos I couldn't.

Wtf is wrong with you?

Quote from: Blue_Moon on May 16, 2016, 11:57:51 PM

Empty shell, huh?  You must have typed in ".net" instead of ".com".  For a "fictitious persona," he sure spent a lot of time on his resume and Launch Vehicle Performance Calculator. 

Are you mental?

His 'resume' is only 2 pages long, how would that take 'a lot of time' to create?

And his 'launch vehicle performance calculator' could be knocked up in a couple of days by any under-employed Indian math-geek, of which there are plenty.

And I did type www.silverbirdastronautics.com the first time; look:

Quote from: Papa Legba on May 16, 2016, 10:53:56 PM

Or tell us why his website, www.silverbirdastronautics.com is an empty shell?

And it is an empty, outdated shell too.

Go read it.

And try to find a photo of John Schilling while you're at it...

Cos I couldn't.

Wtf is wrong with you?

Well, last time I checked, two pages is the upper limit that most employers will look at in a job fair.  Have you tried contacting those organizations that he mentions being a part of?  Of course you didn't, because once you find something you think proves you right, you refuse to dig any deeper.  Typical Legba. 

Okay, Moony-Toons, we get it...

You can't find a photo of John Schilling (lol!) or any evidence that he actually exists at all.

No need to go all Knight In Whining Armour over a fake person.

Go stroke your pussy & calm yourself down a bit, eh, Sir Wanksalot.

Okay, Moony-Toons, we get it...

You can't find a photo of John Schilling (lol!) or any evidence that he actually exists at all.

No need to go all Knight In Whining Armour over a fake person.

Go stroke your pussy & calm yourself down a bit, eh, Sir Wanksalot.

Care to provide a photo of Tim Bolen, or is that too much effort? 

Care to provide a photo of your pussy?

If we're gonna derail from the lulzy non-existence of an alleged 'top rocket expert' we may as well make it interesting.

Good to see you've finally given up all pretence of being an 'aerospace engineering student' & come out as just another JREF-ugee shill, though...

It didn't suit you at all; I could see you were struggling.

Now you can just concentrate on being a dick & turning everything to shit, like all your other JREF troll pals.

And try to find a photo of John Schilling while you're at it...

Cos I couldn't.

Not that difficult.

It's not looking good for papa little baby.

Okay, Moony-Toons, we get it...

You can't find a photo of John Schilling (lol!) or any evidence that he actually exists at all.

No need to go all Knight In Whining Armour over a fake person.

Go stroke your pussy & calm yourself down a bit, eh, Sir Wanksalot.

Why are you looking for a picture of some John Schilling? Do you have a beef with him or something? Who is he anyway?

Quote from: Papa Legba on May 17, 2016, 12:20:20 AM

And try to find a photo of John Schilling while you're at it...

Cos I couldn't.

Not that difficult.

So that's all you got?

ONE photo, less than 6 months old?

From some fake conference about fake nukes fitted to fake rockets in a fake country?

Of someone who's allegedly a leader in his field & runs aerospace companies, etc?

Try a bit harder, eh?

Oh, & Deaf Dick - STFU.

Quote from: nexzus on May 17, 2016, 08:48:38 AM

Quote from: Papa Legba on May 17, 2016, 12:20:20 AM

And try to find a photo of John Schilling while you're at it...

Cos I couldn't.

Not that difficult.

So that's all you got?

ONE photo, less than 6 months old?

From some fake conference about fake nukes fitted to fake rockets in a fake country?

Of someone who's allegedly a leader in his field & runs aerospace companies, etc?

Try a bit harder, eh?

Oh, & Deaf Dick - STFU.

Do you want his LinkedIn page?
https://www.linkedin.com/in/john-schilling-91333010

Oh, look.  He appears to spy on North Korea too:
http://38north.org/author/john-schilling/

He's even been interviewed by the media about his spying activities:
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/02/qa-launch-korea-closer-nuclear-weapon-160208080236443.html
http://www.businessinsider.com/think-tank-north-korea-could-soon-have-a-nuclear-missile-able-to-reach-seattle-2013-11