The ISS is a Gulfstream jet.

Quote from: jroa on May 09, 2016, 04:38:03 PM

Quote from: Blue_Moon on May 09, 2016, 04:34:09 PM

Quote from: jroa on May 09, 2016, 04:13:56 PM

Quoting yourself when nobody responds to your statement probably means that people thought the statement was too dumb to respond to in the first place.  It probably does not mean that your statement has not been quoted enough times. 

I'm pretty sure that was a quote from yourself.  That's usually called irony, but in your case, it's called dumbassery.  I don't even think you read what it is that I quoted. 

Yes, I read your post.  You quoted me, and then quoted yourself, as if your statement is all of the sudden a smart one just because you quoted it.  There is no irony there, but I will accept your admittance of dumbassery.

That quote from myself was from a completely different thread.  I shouldn't have to keep coming up with fresh replies every time dumbasses like you forget. 

Quote from: Blue_Moon on May 09, 2016, 04:10:13 PM

Quote from: jroa on May 09, 2016, 03:50:31 PM

Did the satanists at NASA tell you that too?  Because if NASA says it, it must be true, right?

Quote from: Blue_Moon on April 27, 2016, 08:08:26 AM

Quote from: Space Cowgirl on April 22, 2016, 05:19:51 PM

James would never lie about moonshramps.

Quote from: John Davis on April 26, 2016, 12:52:06 PM

He really wouldn't.

Quote from: jroa on April 26, 2016, 04:27:32 PM

I agree. 

And NASA would never lie about the space program. 

The difference is that NASA releases huge amounts of verifiable public-domain data that also matches third-party observations, and its structure is set up to where a hoax is wholly unfeasible. 
Not to mention you can see the satellites flying about up there if you look hard enough.
In contrast, you just have to take James' word about a particularly strange dream/hallucination that he had.

Oh, so you actually did think that each quote makes your statements less dumb, then.  I will make a note of your mental disorder for future reference. 

NASA releases huge amounts of verifiable public-domain data that also matches third-party observations, and its structure is set up to where a hoax is wholly unfeasible.

Are you saying that NASA has never been caught lying, cheating, or manipulating data? 

Quote from: Blue_Moon on May 09, 2016, 06:30:28 PM

NASA releases huge amounts of verifiable public-domain data that also matches third-party observations, and its structure is set up to where a hoax is wholly unfeasible.

Are you saying that NASA has never been caught lying, cheating, or manipulating data?

Not as a whole, they haven't.  Any organization can have small-scale outlying corruption or mismanagement.  I don't think anybody will argue that.  But that is also a reason that there cannot be a huge unified top-secret conspiracy.  Among the outlying cases, there would be whistle-blowing and blackmailing.  Good luck trying to hide the earth's shape from thousands of highly-qualified professionals whose life's work is to know the orbits and functions of satellites.  And when a thruster gets stuck open and your satellite gets stuck in the wrong aether current that doesn't match a Kepler orbit, good luck getting help from the contractor responsible without setting off any alarms.  Can you imagine how hurt they would be if they found out they had been lied to from the start about something as basic as the shape of the earth?  There would definitely be quite a few whistle-blowers.  But there aren't any.  Not one employee of NASA or any of its many contractors, or any of the other space agencies or their contractors. 
So we're left with a choice:  Either
A.) NASA has the best indoctrination program in the history of mankind, so that even the disgruntled employees and the people who fail the program still carry the secret to the grave, or
B.) There is no all-encompassing conspiracy, NASA has nothing to hide, and (gasp) you still have more to learn about physics and engineering. 

Are you claiming now that there are no NASA whistle blowers?  Are you being serious, or is this some kind of hilarious joke? 

Are you claiming now that there are no NASA whistle blowers?  Are you being serious, or is this some kind of hilarious joke?

Let's include the navy. Not just the U.S. Navy, but all the navies in the world. Would YOU, jroa,  be claiming that there would be Navy whistle blowers ?

It might be enlightening for you to know that quite a few persons view these websites and the FES as some kind of hilarious joke.
Are you being serious ?

Quote from: jroa on May 09, 2016, 07:23:56 PM

Are you claiming now that there are no NASA whistle blowers?  Are you being serious, or is this some kind of hilarious joke?

Let's include the navy. Not just the U.S. Navy, but all the navies in the world. Would YOU, jroa,  be claiming that there would be Navy whistle blowers ?

It might be enlightening for you to know that quite a few persons view these websites and the FES as some kind of hilarious joke.
Are you being serious ?

I typed Navy Whistleblower into Google and got almost a half a million hits in about a half second.  Do you ever do any research before you say dumb things? 

Are you claiming now that there are no NASA whistle blowers?  Are you being serious, or is this some kind of hilarious joke?

Well, when I Googled "NASA whistleblower," most of the results were about alien cities on the moon.  I see no reason to think that this is anything but a nut job who is eager for attention.  A bit like yourself.  But we don't see anything like we would expect from a massive conspiracy, because there isn't one, nor could there ever be. 

Quote from: Googleotomy on May 09, 2016, 08:19:58 PM

Quote from: jroa on May 09, 2016, 07:23:56 PM

Are you claiming now that there are no NASA whistle blowers?  Are you being serious, or is this some kind of hilarious joke?

Let's include the navy. Not just the U.S. Navy, but all the navies in the world. Would YOU, jroa,  be claiming that there would be Navy whistle blowers ?

It might be enlightening for you to know that quite a few persons view these websites and the FES as some kind of hilarious joke.
Are you being serious ?

I typed Navy Whistleblower into Google and got almost a half a million hits in about a half second.  Do you ever do any research before you say dumb things?

Your search skills need a tune up....

I typed +"us navy whistleblower"  into google, and got 71 hits,  mostly about aliens,   so I modified the search  with  -alien -aliens,   and got down to 9 hits.

Mostly seem to be about welding defects,  poor purchasing policies,  corrupt officers taking bribes etc etc. ....    nothing about flat earth or space hoaxes

PS...  The top item on a search for +"nasa whistleblower" is a page devoted to whistleblower protection,  https://oig.nasa.gov/whistleblower.html   go figure..

Quote from: jroa on May 09, 2016, 07:23:56 PM

Are you claiming now that there are no NASA whistle blowers?  Are you being serious, or is this some kind of hilarious joke?

Well, when I Googled "NASA whistleblower," most of the results were about alien cities on the moon.  I see no reason to think that this is anything but a nut job who is eager for attention.  A bit like yourself.  But we don't see anything like we would expect from a massive conspiracy, because there isn't one, nor could there ever be. 

Your expectations are in no way a scientific measure.  Perhaps you simply think too highly of yourself and your gut feelings? 

Quote from: jroa on May 09, 2016, 08:29:09 PM

Quote from: Googleotomy on May 09, 2016, 08:19:58 PM

Quote from: jroa on May 09, 2016, 07:23:56 PM

Are you claiming now that there are no NASA whistle blowers?  Are you being serious, or is this some kind of hilarious joke?

Let's include the navy. Not just the U.S. Navy, but all the navies in the world. Would YOU, jroa,  be claiming that there would be Navy whistle blowers ?

It might be enlightening for you to know that quite a few persons view these websites and the FES as some kind of hilarious joke.
Are you being serious ?

I typed Navy Whistleblower into Google and got almost a half a million hits in about a half second.  Do you ever do any research before you say dumb things?

Your search skills need a tune up....

I typed +"us navy whistleblower"  into google, and got 71 hits,  mostly about aliens,   so I modified the search  with  -alien -aliens,   and got down to 9 hits.

Mostly seem to be about welding defects,  poor purchasing policies,  corrupt officers taking bribes etc etc. ....    nothing about flat earth or space hoaxes

PS...  The top item on a search for +"nasa whistleblower" is a page devoted to whistleblower protection,  https://oig.nasa.gov/whistleblower.html   go figure..

NASA whistleblower does seem to bring up some alien conspiracy claims, but it also brings up sites like https://oig.nasa.gov/whistleblower.html which is the official site for NASA that lists their whistleblower protection rules and contact information.  Why would NASA need such a page if whistleblowers are not running rampant within their ranks? 

Quote from: Rayzor on May 09, 2016, 09:00:50 PM

Quote from: jroa on May 09, 2016, 08:29:09 PM

Quote from: Googleotomy on May 09, 2016, 08:19:58 PM

Quote from: jroa on May 09, 2016, 07:23:56 PM

Are you claiming now that there are no NASA whistle blowers?  Are you being serious, or is this some kind of hilarious joke?

Let's include the navy. Not just the U.S. Navy, but all the navies in the world. Would YOU, jroa,  be claiming that there would be Navy whistle blowers ?

It might be enlightening for you to know that quite a few persons view these websites and the FES as some kind of hilarious joke.
Are you being serious ?

I typed Navy Whistleblower into Google and got almost a half a million hits in about a half second.  Do you ever do any research before you say dumb things?

Your search skills need a tune up....

I typed +"us navy whistleblower"  into google, and got 71 hits,  mostly about aliens,   so I modified the search  with  -alien -aliens,   and got down to 9 hits.

Mostly seem to be about welding defects,  poor purchasing policies,  corrupt officers taking bribes etc etc. ....    nothing about flat earth or space hoaxes

PS...  The top item on a search for +"nasa whistleblower" is a page devoted to whistleblower protection,  https://oig.nasa.gov/whistleblower.html   go figure..

NASA whistleblower does seem to bring up some alien conspiracy claims, but it also brings up sites like https://oig.nasa.gov/whistleblower.html which is the official site for NASA that lists their whistleblower protection rules and contact information.  Why would NASA need such a page if whistleblowers are not running rampant within their ranks?

You must not have read it.  It's not condemning whistleblowers; it's saying that if someone reports mismanagement, they can feel legally safe doing so. 

Federal law prohibits NASA managers from retaliating against employees who provide information they reasonably believe evidences:
a violation of any law, rule, or regulation;
gross mismanagement;
a gross waste of funds;
an abuse of authority;
or a substantial and specific danger to public health and safety.

A hoax would fall pretty squarely under all of these categories.  So where are all these "rampant whistleblowers?"  They would have nothing to fear, so why haven't we seen any substantial evidence of a hoax?  Probably because there isn't one.  It's impossible. 

So, do you finally admit that NASA whistleblowers do, in fact, exist now? 

So, do you finally admit that NASA whistleblowers do, in fact, exist now?

Has one said the ISS does not exist?

NASA releases huge amounts of verifiable public-domain data that also matches third-party observations

It didn't match mine.

None of it does.

And none of it obeys basic laws of physics either...

NASA are full of shit.

Quote from: Blue_Moon on May 09, 2016, 06:30:28 PM

NASA releases huge amounts of verifiable public-domain data that also matches third-party observations

It didn't match mine.

None of it does.

And none of it obeys basic laws of physics either...

NASA are full of shit.

And why should we trust you?  You clearly don't understand basic physics, and you've demonstrated that you're willing to continue peddling a lie in the face of legitimate evidence.  And you never seem to provide any evidence yourself beyond anecdotes.  It's pretty obvious that NASA is not the one that is full of shit. 

Toodle-pip, Bolen Troll!

You clearly don't understand basic physics, and you've demonstrated that you're willing to continue peddling a lie in the face of legitimate evidence.

Just making shit up...

For the Defence of the Fair Maiden NASA!

Quote from: Sir Shillalot on May 10, 2016, 03:30:03 PM

You clearly don't understand basic physics, and you've demonstrated that you're willing to continue peddling a lie in the face of legitimate evidence.

Just making shit up...

So you finally admit it, huh?

LOL!!!

Given up completely on the 'aerospace engineering student' schtick & going with 'shill tactics 101' now, eh?

You lot always do.

For the Defence of the Fair Maiden NASA & her multi-billion dollar dowry!

The ISS is not even in space. It is only 230 miles high. A well know statement says that Earth's atmosphere ends at 450 miles. It requires constant refueling and the NASA website shows the fuel usage. The same goes for satellites. Therefore nothing has been in space. Clearly the moon landings were a hoax as well.

The ISS is not even in space. It is only 230 miles high. A well know statement says that Earth's atmosphere ends at 450 miles. It requires constant refueling and the NASA website shows the fuel usage. The same goes for satellites. Therefore nothing has been in space. Clearly the moon landings were a hoax as well.

How are communications satellites refulled?

The same way that straw-man spamming sock-puppets are...

I.e. by just making shit up as you go along.

Here's your 'ISS':

]

250 miles high?

lol no!

The ISS is not even in space. It is only 230 miles high. A well know statement says that Earth's atmosphere ends at 450 miles. It requires constant refueling and the NASA website shows the fuel usage. The same goes for satellites. Therefore nothing has been in space. Clearly the moon landings were a hoax as well.

The atmosphere has no defined limit, but the commonly accepted boundary of space is about 62 miles.  Now's your chance to reevaluate your statement. 

Yes; let's watch you defeat your sock-puppet strawman foe in single combat, Sir Shillalot...

It will be a valiant joust, full of chivalry, and... *Yawn!*... ZZzzzzzzzZZzzzzzzzzz.....

Yes; let's watch you defeat your sock-puppet strawman foe in single combat, Sir Shillalot...

It will be a valiant joust, full of chivalry, and... *Yawn!*... ZZzzzzzzzZZzzzzzzzzz.....

Don't you have anything better to do, like work on your research report about how blunt bodies don't actually help disperse heat?  What about your reports on how a small pod on a small aircraft can project an image of the ISS directly into people's eyes, or how inertia coupling remains an insurmountable problem?  We're all dying to see your published results. 

Off you go! 

blunt bodies don't actually help disperse heat?  What about your reports on how a small pod on a small aircraft can project an image of the ISS directly into people's eyes, or how inertia coupling remains an insurmountable problem?  We're all dying to see your published results. 

Off you go!

Already been published, dickhead, by everyone in aerospace, back in the 1950s or earlier.

You're just too dumb to go find it or interpret the results.

I'm not, though.

Shit, you're even too dumb to realise that by LOOKING at a projector, the image it is PROJECTING will appear on your retina...

Jesus Christ, your latest bullshit sock-ID is totally ruined, shill...

Just grow up, eh?

Quote from: Blue_Moon on May 11, 2016, 01:08:40 PM

blunt bodies don't actually help disperse heat?  What about your reports on how a small pod on a small aircraft can project an image of the ISS directly into people's eyes, or how inertia coupling remains an insurmountable problem?  We're all dying to see your published results. 

Off you go!

Already been published, dickhead, by everyone in aerospace, back in the 1950s or earlier.

You're just too dumb to go find it or interpret the results.

I'm not, though.

Shit, you're even too dumb to realise that by LOOKING at a projector, the image it is PROJECTING will appear on your retina...

Jesus Christ, your latest bullshit sock-ID is totally ruined, shill...

Just grow up, eh?

All images that you see are projected on your retina, but if you look at a projector from a distance, you will only see a single point, you ignorant fuck. 

if you look at a projector from a distance, you will only see a single point, you ignorant fuck.

LOL!!!

And what, exactly, do you see when you look at teh silly fake ISS from a distance?

Hmm?

You are utterly ruined, shill.

Grow up & get a proper job ffs.

Quote from: Blue_Moon on May 11, 2016, 01:31:37 PM

if you look at a projector from a distance, you will only see a single point, you ignorant fuck.

LOL!!!

And what, exactly, do you see when you look at teh silly fake ISS from a distance?

Hmm?

You are utterly ruined, shill.

Grow up & get a proper job ffs.

If you have a proper telescope, you will see this: