Why would stars appear because people are born and killed? They are demons. The only celestial object that would have appeared with a birth is the moon, two thousand years ago.
Just because you believe a plane travels over the Antarctic does not mean it does.
According to Genisis only 1/3 of all people became deamons. Are you suggesting that the number of people that has ever and will ever live is such a ridiculous number?
Antarctica is about as easy to identify as the the back of your hand. Where else do the southern stars rotate counter clockwise around appoint directly above you?
Where else does the sun (Gods light, remmeber the "demons" are deceiving) does this as well?
Do what? The Sun is not spoken of in what you quote.
rotate counter clockwise around appoint directly above you?
^ What the sun does ^
Since you need to be spoonfed information.
This is not what was said. They referred specifically to the Southern Stars.
The Sun is not visible at the poles.
I never said he said that. I just said that is what the sun does.
The Sun is not visible at the poles.
You said yourself that the sun shines at the poles. You just proved yourself to be a liar.
You have accused me of dishonesty many times. Every single time it has been shown that you are the one bearing false witness.
God's light is visible at the pole: this does not mean the Sun is. If you turn a light on in your room, and walk outside, you may see the light even if you do not see the bulb. The edge of the world is closest to Hell, where God has withdrawn his presence and cast them into darkness.
But the sun is definitely visible at the poles, and you said that the sun is gods light. If the sun is not visible then gods light is not. You can see the light from the room a lightbulb you can't see is illuminating, but the poles themselves are illuminated so the sun must be visible; it's bright as day. Also there is a big light in the sky which looks just like the sun.
You have accused me of dishonesty many times. Every single time it has been shown that you are the one bearing false witness.
Nope, not once have you even tried to counter me.
A pale imitation of the Sun is visible at the poles. It does not follow God's path, and does not shine with the same brightness or heat.
You lie once more. You pretended there was no movement to discourage tourism to Antarctica, and there was. You claimed I had not answered your question, and I had. You claimed my justification was personal opinion, and it was not: you swiftly ignored all of this once it was pointed out to you.
Exodus 20:16 Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.
You are lying. There are no movements to stop tourism, only movements to decrease impact on the exosystems from tourism. Also, you did not answer my questions directly. And you basing your claims on "it's logical" does not make it backed up, it's still only your opinion.
So I guess you just sinned yourself. Sure you are no demon?
Movements to decrease impact how? It discourages tourism.
You ask many things. I answer many directly, which indirectly contain the answers to your others: far easier than repeating myself. I am assuming you will be honest.
Logical deductions for simple facts are not an opinion.
Do not lie.
No, it does not discourage tourism. If you think so you didn't even read through these articles yourself.
It was earlier that you didn't answer directly to my questions. If you want to I can dig it up.
"Logical deductions"? You assumed that the edge has to be somewhere cold because the sun never leaves earth? Sorry, but these do not connect. And did you forget my logical deduction which was based on part of your "logical deduction" (sun never leaves earth), where the sun during a south pole summer appears to make laps around the observer, which means that the earth is everywhere around the observer, and therefore the south pole? This is based entirely on observations as well.
I am not lying. You are, and you're ignorant.
You claim it does not follow, and offer no justification. The Sun does not cross the edge. What then would provide heat?
You lie again. I have explained that to you: a pale mimicry alone is visible sometimes at the pole, and it does not follow God's path or time.
What is it I claim is not following what?
I know the sun does not cross the edge, I don't even believe there is an edge to begin with. Stop lying about my claims, I can just go back and re-read my posts as anyone can.
No, the sun is still pretty strong at the poles. Do you really think demons could mimic the bright and warm light of god? Also, if you travel to the south pole during the day by boat you can follow the sun and see that it is the same during the whole travel. Do you really think demons would be able to block out gods light and replace it with their own?
If you had indeed gone back and read your posts, you would see you were insisting that there was no logical bases for the edge of the world to be cold, acknowledging a flat world as specified by the Bible. The Sun would not cross the edge of a flat world because it is always visible somewhere on the world. You now claim (with no justification) that it does not follow that the edge would be cold, despite the fact it would clearly, by definition, receive much less sunlight if any.
Are you simply wasting time? You did this exact thing when we first began conversing, asking the exact same question multiple times and repeatedly refusing to explain why my answer was not enough. You claim I lie when everything I say is simple truth, and you insult rather than offer any explanation whatsoever for your claims.
No, demons cannot mimic God's light. This is why their attempt is so poor. It is cold, distant, and does not follow His cycle.
It is far easier to deceive a human than pretend Godhood. It would not be hard to trick the incredibly slight handful who would travel by a certain means, at a certain time of day, at a very limited time of year, and who would be staring at the sky constantly despite the fact we are taught from birth not to look at God's light directly.