Oh, I see now. So you are right just because everyone else thinks like you not because you have any evidence to back it up. Good thinking! What you mentioned is not evidence. You don't have evidence. You can't have evidence. You haven't been to space. You trust someone who is basically making a fool out of you. I definitely don't get it how believing unconditionally in whoever doesn't constitute naivety. No reasonable person should believe a picture is real without evidence it is. In this case, the evidence doesn't exist. It cannot be verified by anyone independently. By the way, pictures are never evidence.
So apparently you've actually been to space yourself, and seen the earth from a distance, and can personally assure me that it's indeed flat? And yet—strangely—you have even less photographic evidence—genuine or bogus—than I do in order to support your contarary claim about the earth's geometry?
And to claim photographic images are "never evidence" means that you've never been in a criminal law court, where photographic evidence is consistently tendered as the prosecution's evidence. And if you've not visited the Taj Mahal, the Eiffel Tower, or the Sydney Harbour bridge, and seen only photographs of them, then presumably—using your logic [
sic]—they may well not exist?
Like numerous flat earthers here, you simply attempt to repudiate all the established evidence for the spherical planet without ever supplying any viable conflicting evidence of your own.
What's even more absurd is that you're apparently claiming that millions of astrophysicists the world over are wrong and/or lying—whilst at the same time you can't even name a handful of scientists who support your view. Which in any rational person's opinion sounds ludicrous, even at first glance.