I won Heiwa's €1,000,000 challenge

Quote from: markjo on August 24, 2018, 01:11:43 PM

Quote from: Jane on August 24, 2018, 11:44:31 AM

Quote from: RocketSauce on August 23, 2018, 02:55:32 PM

Prior to that and the Dr Doolittle thread she started, I was a huge Jane fan.

The... what thread??

Was that the thread where you talk to the ducks before you kick them?

I wish, even if it was fiction...


No... it was about some time traveler, parallel universe stuff... and how the books were better than the show... huge cult classic nerd stuff (which I don't mind, my prom date was the schools super nerd, she introduced me to big bang theory show and actually understood the super sciency jokes. I introduced her to breaking bad and she was following the chemistry

Yeah, Yeah.  That's great and all, but we are veering off from discussing the hilarity that is Heiwa.

You are a twerp that hasn't understood that I have the money but that all my five Challenges cannot be won. My Challenges are just examples of Fake News that twerps believe.

So you finally admit your challenges are fake.

Mike

Quote from: markjo on August 23, 2018, 07:29:46 PM

Quote from: Heiwa on August 23, 2018, 10:22:13 AM

My Challenges are just examples of Fake News that twerps believe.

Your "challenges" are fake news that no one believes.

I believe

Am I to believe that you believe all this Fake News that twerps believe?

Quote from: Heiwa on August 23, 2018, 10:22:13 AM

You are a twerp that hasn't understood that I have the money but that all my five Challenges cannot be won. My Challenges are just examples of Fake News that twerps believe.

So you finally admit your challenges are fake.

Mike

Microbrain, please.

My Challenges are about Fake News published by media at the request of various authorities.

1. The atomic bombs 1945 were and is just Fake News to scare people. They cannot be ignited. And that's the Challenge.
2. People flying in space in the 1960's onward is also Fake News. They cannot return to Earth alive. And that's the Challenge.
3. Bow visor falling off a ship 1994 is also Fake News. Waves do not knock off bow visors. And that's the Challenge.
4. Skyscrapers collapsing from top down into dust 2001 was also Fake News. Weak tops cannot crush strong bottoms of structures. And that's the Challenge. Your relatives having witnessed it must have witnessed something else.
5. Fusion on Earth ever is Fake News any time. Anything associated with fusion on Earth will melt.  And that's the Challenge.
I describe my findings and Challenges at http://heiwaco.com since many years. They are good, real news.

This does seem slightly relevant to this thread.

What do you call one who posts on Twitter? I assume that would be a Twit.

What do you call posts on Twitter? We all know they are Tweets.

What do you call one who reads and believes Tweets? I assume that would be a Twerp.

So would it be reasonable to claim that the Grate US of A is being ruled by a Twit and his acolytes are all Twerps?

Quote from: markjo on August 24, 2018, 01:11:43 PM

Quote from: Jane on August 24, 2018, 11:44:31 AM

Quote from: RocketSauce on August 23, 2018, 02:55:32 PM

Prior to that and the Dr Doolittle thread she started, I was a huge Jane fan.

The... what thread??

Was that the thread where you talk to the ducks before you kick them?

I wish, even if it was fiction...


No... it was about some time traveler, parallel universe stuff... and how the books were better than the show... huge cult classic nerd stuff (which I don't mind, my prom date was the schools super nerd, she introduced me to big bang theory show and actually understood the super sciency jokes. I introduced her to breaking bad and she was following the chemistry

Nope, still no clue.

You are a twerp that hasn't understood that I have the money but that all my five Challenges cannot be won. My Challenges are just examples of Fake News that twerps believe.

There are five now?!
Damn it, who's been feeding Heiwa's challenges?

My Challenges are about Fake News published by media at the request of various authorities.

No, your fake challenges are Fake News published by Anders Björkman, alias Heiwa in Fake News and Ignoramous Science

You can't understand atmospheric re-entry without burning up but a dumb meteor can do that and end up as this massive meteorite!

Towards an Understanding of the Fall Circumstances of the Hoba Meteorite

Hoba Meteorite, Namibia, Meteoritical Bulletin Database

Abstract
Using the observed attributes of the Hoba meteorite, that it is a single mass which survived impact intact, we investigate the possible conditions leading to its fall.
Specifically, we assess the scenario in which the Hoba progenitor is envisioned as encountering Earth’s atmosphere at a shallow angle of entry, with a low velocity and stabilized profile to the oncoming airflow. In order to physically survive impact we find, via the planar impact approximation, that the Hoba meteorite must have landed with a speed smaller than a few hundred meters per second.
We find that the envisioned model can satisfy, in its extreme limit of low entry speed, maximum area profile and near
horizontal entry angle the required landing conditions. We deduce that the progenitor mass for the Hoba meteorite was likely of order 5x10⁵ kg, and that a simple impact crater, now eroded, having a diameter of some 20 meters and a depth of about 5 meters was produced upon impact.

From: Towards an Understanding of the Fall Circumstances of the Hoba Meteorite

Could if be said that a dumb hunk of rock has a better understanding of atmospheric re-entry you, who pretend you know everything about everything?

Just askin'.

Quote from: Heiwa on August 24, 2018, 06:50:12 PM

My Challenges are about Fake News published by media at the request of various authorities.

No, your fake challenges are Fake News published by Anders Björkman, alias Heiwa in Fake News and Ignoramous Science

You can't understand atmospheric re-entry without burning up but a dumb meteor can do that and end up as this massive meteorite!

Quote from: Martin Beech, Campion College, The University of Regina

Towards an Understanding of the Fall Circumstances of the Hoba Meteorite

Hoba Meteorite, Namibia, Meteoritical Bulletin Database

Abstract
Using the observed attributes of the Hoba meteorite, that it is a single mass which survived impact intact, we investigate the possible conditions leading to its fall.
Specifically, we assess the scenario in which the Hoba progenitor is envisioned as encountering Earth’s atmosphere at a shallow angle of entry, with a low velocity and stabilized profile to the oncoming airflow. In order to physically survive impact we find, via the planar impact approximation, that the Hoba meteorite must have landed with a speed smaller than a few hundred meters per second.
We find that the envisioned model can satisfy, in its extreme limit of low entry speed, maximum area profile and near
horizontal entry angle the required landing conditions. We deduce that the progenitor mass for the Hoba meteorite was likely of order 5x10⁵ kg, and that a simple impact crater, now eroded, having a diameter of some 20 meters and a depth of about 5 meters was produced upon impact.

From: Towards an Understanding of the Fall Circumstances of the Hoba Meteorite

Could if be said that a dumb hunk of rock has a better understanding of atmospheric re-entry you, who pretend you know everything about everything?

Just askin'.

Thanks for asking. To win my space trip Challenge (topic) space craft landings on the Moon (no atmosphere), Mars (very thin atmosphere) and Earth (atmosphere with storms, rain, etc) must be soft, i.e. no impact craters, etc. It seems this Hoba Meteorite was slightly damaged when landing. Did the parachute fail?

Thanks for asking. To win my space trip Challenge (topic) space craft landings on the Moon (no atmosphere),

That's easy. Low gravity and retrorockets - ever heard of them?

Mars (very thin atmosphere)

Still aerobraking, probsbly with repeated entry leading to gradually decaying highly elliptical orbits, then parachutes.
And finally a cushioned landing, already used, or retro rockets.

and Earth (atmosphere with storms, rain, etc)

So? The atmosphere is much thicker and denser than on Mars and versions of skip reentry can be used.
Here is a possible profile from your favourite authority on such things,  NASA  !
If there are storms just avoid them and who cares about a bit of rain. So you get a bit wet.

must be soft, i.e. no impact craters, etc. It seems this Hoba Meteorite was slightly damaged when landing.

There was an impact crater from the Hoba Meteorite but it was not very deep. It was estimated to have landed at about 720 km/hr - terminal velocity.
The velocity is uncertain as the meteor deliver company failed to install the required instrument and telemetry.
Besides earth lacked any receiving stations tens of thousands of years ago.

Did the parachute fail?

Much of that is from weathering of tens of thousands of years. The main mass is estimated at more than 60 tonnes.
I suspect, also, that the meteor deliver company were quite negligent and also failed to install the parachute.

But the point is that meteor did not burn up and the 720 km/hr on a far less dense capsule could easily be controlled by parachute.
An SR-71 disintegrated at Mach 3.18 and 78,000 feet and one pilot, Bill Weaver, survived so 720 km/hr is chicken feed!
Bill Weaver didn't eject, the SR-71 just disintegrated around him. The other person in the SR-71 was killed by the disintegration.

Quote from: Heiwa on August 24, 2018, 08:02:35 PM

Thanks for asking. To win my space trip Challenge (topic) space craft landings on the Moon (no atmosphere),

That's easy. Low gravity and retrorockets - ever heard of them?

Quote from: Heiwa

Mars (very thin atmosphere)

Still aerobraking, probsbly with repeated entry leading to gradually decaying highly elliptical orbits, then parachutes.
And finally a cushioned landing, already used, or retro rockets.

Quote from: Heiwa

and Earth (atmosphere with storms, rain, etc)

So? The atmosphere is much thicker and denser than on Mars and versions of skip reentry can be used.
Here is a possible profile from your favourite authority on such things,  NASA  !

A 1963 sketch illustrating a possible skip reentry trajectory of the Apollo spacecraft

If there are storms just avoid them and who cares about a bit of rain. So you get a bit wet.

Quote from: Heiwa

must be soft, i.e. no impact craters, etc. It seems this Hoba Meteorite was slightly damaged when landing.

There was an impact crater from the Hoba Meteorite but it was not very deep. It was estimated to have landed at about 720 km/hr - terminal velocity.
The velocity is uncertain as the meteor deliver company failed to install the required instrument and telemetry.
Besides earth lacked any receiving stations tens of thousands of years ago.

Quote from: Heiwa

Did the parachute fail?

Much of that is from weathering of tens of thousands of years. The main mass is estimated at more than 60 tonnes.
I suspect, also, that the meteor deliver company were quite negligent and also failed to install the parachute.

But the point is that meteor did not burn up and the 720 km/hr on a far less dense capsule could easily be controlled by parachute.
An SR-71 disintegrated at Mach 3.18 and 78,000 feet and one pilot, Bill Weaver, survived so 720 km/hr is chicken feed!
Bill Weaver didn't eject, the SR-71 just disintegrated around him. The other person in the SR-71 was killed by the disintegration.

Good! Just put all this knowledge to proper use and have a go at my space travel Challenge (topic). Did this SR-71 and Bill Weaver return from the Moon or Mars? Any toilet on an SR-71?
And did Bill twitter? Only persons I am aware of twittering are Leon Musk and Donald Trump. Leon is twittering 130 hrs/week selling cars and space trips to Mars and Donald is doing deals with North Korea apart from legal problems at home. Are these guys real?

Good! Just put all this knowledge to proper use and have a go at my space travel Challenge (topic).

Planning a little jaunt to the moon took numerous people with far deeper knowledge of rocket theory and design, orbital mechanics, astrophysics etc than you or I can hope to have.

You pretend to know all about it and because you can't explain how it could be done assume it is impossible.
I, on the other hand, do not make any pretence of having all this expertise embodied in one person so will never pretend that I could do it.
Nevertheless, the little bits that I have looked at in detail seem eminently feasible.

Did this SR-71 and Bill Weaver return from the Moon or Mars?

Don't be a total blithering idiot! That was on Jan. 25, 1966!
So of course Bill Weaver did not "return from the Moon or Mars" and I never made the slightest suggestion that he did.
But he survived a "forced ejection" at almost 950 m/s at 78,000 ft and that is all I said.

Any toilet on an SR-71?

What is medically wrong with you that you demand toilets everywhere. I guess the SR-71 had the same problems as fighter pilots:

pilots have used bottles and bags - or just held it. Many avoid liquids, or make sure their last stop before climbing into the cockpit is a bathroom. ... At least twice, F-16s have crashed as their pilots tried to urinate.

And did Bill twitter?

Hardly, back in 1966, only birds twittered their tweets not supposedly mature men like Donald Duck, Twerp or whatever his name is.

Only persons I am aware of twittering are Leon Musk and Donald Trump.

As I said, dear Donald seems to be a twit and all his followers are twerps.

Leon is twittering 130 hrs/week selling cars and space trips to Mars and Donald is doing deals with North Korea apart from legal problems at home. Are these guys real?

And I've never heard of any "Leon Musk twittering 130 hrs/week selling cars and space trips to Mars"!
The only Leon I know of was Leon Trotsky and he wasn't a very nice type. Not the sort of bloke you want your daughter going out with!
So I don't know what you're rattling on about!

And I've never heard of any "Leon Musk twittering 130 hrs/week selling cars and space trips to Mars"!
The only Leon I know of was Leon Trotsky and he wasn't a very nice type. Not the sort of bloke you want your daughter going out with!
So I don't know what you're rattling on about!

Sorry, I mixed up Elon with Leon. Mid 1990's I spent time at Nikolaev, Ukraine, to assist the local shipyards there, so they could build and sell ships to make money. It was not popular. The nationalist government at Kiev was against it. Close all the shipyards and destroy 100.000 jobs was the official Ukrainian policy. Imagine that! 100.000 jobs destroyed. Well, the 100.000 jobs were mostly for Russians and Jews that had built ships there 200 years and the Ukrainians at Kiev and up in the mountains at Carpatia didn't like Russians and Jews.
My plan was to put my daughter in the school where Leon Bronstein had studied 100 years earlier at Nikolaev to assist the local industry. Ever heard of Leon Bronstein - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leon_Trotsky .
Well Leon T was later murdered and I am happy it didn't happen to me.
Sorry, the topic is something else but I really liked Nikolaev, Ukraine, and Leon's Russian school there. It could have been great fun.

Quote from: rabinoz on August 25, 2018, 05:49:15 AM

And I've never heard of any "Leon Musk twittering 130 hrs/week selling cars and space trips to Mars"!
The only Leon I know of was Leon Trotsky and he wasn't a very nice type. Not the sort of bloke you want your daughter going out with!
So I don't know what you're rattling on about!

Sorry, I mixed up Elon with Leon. Mid 1990's I spent time at Nikolaev, Ukraine, to assist the local shipyards there, so they could build and sell ships to make money. It was not popular. The nationalist government at Kiev was against it. Close all the shipyards and destroy 100.000 jobs was the official Ukrainian policy. Imagine that! 100.000 jobs destroyed. Well, the 100.000 jobs were mostly for Russians and Jews that had built ships there 200 years and the Ukrainians at Kiev and up in the mountains at Carpatia didn't like Russians and Jews.
My plan was to put my daughter in the school where Leon Bronstein had studied 100 years earlier at Nikolaev to assist the local industry. Ever heard of Leon Bronstein - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leon_Trotsky .
Well Leon T was later murdered and I am happy it didn't happen to me.
Sorry, the topic is something else but I really liked Nikolaev, Ukraine, and Leon's Russian school there. It could have been great fun.

So sorry, of course, I realised that you meant Elon Musk and you made a simple mistake.
I'm no fan of Elon Musk but Telsa don't make bad cars and SpaceX seems able to launch rockets very competitively so who cares what a twit Elon Musk is.

Quote from: Heiwa on August 25, 2018, 07:15:54 AM

Quote from: rabinoz on August 25, 2018, 05:49:15 AM

And I've never heard of any "Leon Musk twittering 130 hrs/week selling cars and space trips to Mars"!
The only Leon I know of was Leon Trotsky and he wasn't a very nice type. Not the sort of bloke you want your daughter going out with!
So I don't know what you're rattling on about!

Sorry, I mixed up Elon with Leon. Mid 1990's I spent time at Nikolaev, Ukraine, to assist the local shipyards there, so they could build and sell ships to make money. It was not popular. The nationalist government at Kiev was against it. Close all the shipyards and destroy 100.000 jobs was the official Ukrainian policy. Imagine that! 100.000 jobs destroyed. Well, the 100.000 jobs were mostly for Russians and Jews that had built ships there 200 years and the Ukrainians at Kiev and up in the mountains at Carpatia didn't like Russians and Jews.
My plan was to put my daughter in the school where Leon Bronstein had studied 100 years earlier at Nikolaev to assist the local industry. Ever heard of Leon Bronstein - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leon_Trotsky .
Well Leon T was later murdered and I am happy it didn't happen to me.
Sorry, the topic is something else but I really liked Nikolaev, Ukraine, and Leon's Russian school there. It could have been great fun.

So sorry, of course, I realised that you meant Elon Musk and you made a simple mistake.
I'm no fan of Elon Musk but Telsa don't make bad cars and SpaceX seems able to launch rockets very competitively so who cares what a twit Elon Musk is.

You don't know what you are talking about.
This little Tesla car company doesn't produce many cars 2018 and what it produces is at a loss of $20 000 a piece or $700 million/every 3 months. It will not last. CEO Lone Skum has a problem.
And SpaceX. It is worse than ever.
In a year Tesla/SpaceX will be history. And Elon? Probably dead, buried and forgotten. Final, fatal burn out!
Did you pay for a ticket to Mars?

In a year Tesla/SpaceX will be history. And Elon? Probably dead, buried and forgotten. Final, fatal burn out!

Isn't that what you've been saying for the last 10 years?

Quote from: Heiwa on August 26, 2018, 11:58:31 AM

In a year Tesla/SpaceX will be history. And Elon? Probably dead, buried and forgotten. Final, fatal burn out!

Isn't that what you've been saying for the last 10 years?

No, it is only recently I have started to look into the SpaceX and Musk's rockets that after delivering a second stage into space flip 180° and come back for landing where they started. http://heiwaco.com/moontravele.htm Complete nonsense by and for twerps, just photo shopped video shows, but anyway. Just a small bit of fake USA with its fake POTUS, Congress, media, everything. Only twerps take USA serious today.

Quote from: markjo on August 26, 2018, 08:43:21 PM

Quote from: Heiwa on August 26, 2018, 11:58:31 AM

In a year Tesla/SpaceX will be history. And Elon? Probably dead, buried and forgotten. Final, fatal burn out!

Isn't that what you've been saying for the last 10 years?

No, it is only recently I have started to look into the SpaceX and Musk's rockets that after delivering a second stage into space flip 180° and come back for landing where they started.

More shoddy research.  Most of the boosters actually land on one of 2 barges in the middle of the ocean.

Complete nonsense by and for twerps, just photo shopped video shows, but anyway.

So the countless people who saw the boosters land are all liars too, right?

Just a small bit of fake USA with its fake POTUS, Congress, media, everything. Only twerps take USA serious today.

Ariannespace seems to be taking SpaceX seriously.  You probably should too.
https://arstechnica.com/science/2018/05/ariane-chief-seems-frustrated-with-spacex-for-driving-down-launch-costs/

Quote from: Heiwa on August 26, 2018, 09:59:27 PM

Quote from: markjo on August 26, 2018, 08:43:21 PM

Quote from: Heiwa on August 26, 2018, 11:58:31 AM

In a year Tesla/SpaceX will be history. And Elon? Probably dead, buried and forgotten. Final, fatal burn out!

Isn't that what you've been saying for the last 10 years?

No, it is only recently I have started to look into the SpaceX and Musk's rockets that after delivering a second stage into space flip 180° and come back for landing where they started.

More shoddy research.  Most of the boosters actually land on one of 2 barges in the middle of the ocean.

Quote from: Heiwa on August 26, 2018, 09:59:27 PM

Complete nonsense by and for twerps, just photo shopped video shows, but anyway.

So the countless people who saw the boosters land are all liars too, right?

Quote from: Heiwa on August 26, 2018, 09:59:27 PM

Just a small bit of fake USA with its fake POTUS, Congress, media, everything. Only twerps take USA serious today.

Ariannespace seems to be taking SpaceX seriously.  You probably should too.
https://arstechnica.com/science/2018/05/ariane-chief-seems-frustrated-with-spacex-for-driving-down-launch-costs/

Yes, some SpaceX rockets landed on barges and some missed the barges at sea. But the big thing was the landings back where they started.

At sea nobody witnessed any landings. The area was off limits and all was remote control.

On land some witnesses filmed the landings from far away. The usual Slime Musk nonsense.

Arianespace probably considers SpaceX/Skum a joke.

Topic here is my human space travel Challenge that twerps like you, markjo, cannot win because you are so stupid.

Quote from: markjo on August 27, 2018, 10:53:10 AM

Quote from: Heiwa on August 26, 2018, 09:59:27 PM

Quote from: markjo on August 26, 2018, 08:43:21 PM

Quote from: Heiwa on August 26, 2018, 11:58:31 AM

In a year Tesla/SpaceX will be history. And Elon? Probably dead, buried and forgotten. Final, fatal burn out!

Isn't that what you've been saying for the last 10 years?

No, it is only recently I have started to look into the SpaceX and Musk's rockets that after delivering a second stage into space flip 180° and come back for landing where they started.

More shoddy research.  Most of the boosters actually land on one of 2 barges in the middle of the ocean.

Quote from: Heiwa on August 26, 2018, 09:59:27 PM

Complete nonsense by and for twerps, just photo shopped video shows, but anyway.

So the countless people who saw the boosters land are all liars too, right?

Quote from: Heiwa on August 26, 2018, 09:59:27 PM

Just a small bit of fake USA with its fake POTUS, Congress, media, everything. Only twerps take USA serious today.

Ariannespace seems to be taking SpaceX seriously.  You probably should too.
https://arstechnica.com/science/2018/05/ariane-chief-seems-frustrated-with-spacex-for-driving-down-launch-costs/

Yes, some SpaceX rockets landed on barges and some missed the barges at sea. But the big thing was the landings back where they started.

At sea nobody witnessed any landings. The area was off limits and all was remote control.

On land some witnesses filmed the landings from far away. The usual Slime Musk nonsense.

Arianespace probably considers SpaceX/Skum a joke.

Topic here is my human space travel Challenge that twerps like you, markjo, cannot win because you are so stupid.

The only stupid person here is you, Heiwa.  Your willful ignorance to evidence that contradicts your delusions is ample proof that you are a twerp and may just be the dumbest shit stain on this forum.

Is your name pronounced Hi-wah or Hee-wah?
For some reason I always read it as the former, but looking at it, that doesn't actually make sense.

On land some witnesses filmed the landings from far away. The usual Slime Musk nonsense.

What nonsense?  As a safety expert, would you allow spectators close to the landing site?

Arianespace probably considers SpaceX/Skum a joke.

Yes, SpaceX is a joke that just might drive Arianespace out of business.

In fact, SpaceX is so cheap that Ariane's CEO worries SpaceX could eventually "kick Europe out of space" if Ariane cannot figure out a way to launch its rockets more cheaply. In an attempt to respond to the threat from SpaceX, Airbus and Ariane began designing a new family of rockets -- dubbed "Ariane 6" -- in 2012 to replace its venerable Ariane 5 line.

Is your name pronounced Hi-wah or Hee-wah?
For some reason I always read it as the former, but looking at it, that doesn't actually make sense.

Hmm. I have been reading it as 'Hey-wah'.

Please tell us Heiwa, how to pronounce your name? 

Quote from: Jane on August 27, 2018, 01:06:43 PM

Is your name pronounced Hi-wah or Hee-wah?
For some reason I always read it as the former, but looking at it, that doesn't actually make sense.

Hmm. I have been reading it as 'Hey-wah'.

Please tell us Heiwa, how to pronounce your name? 

His name is Anders Björkman and you can learn more in Shock Interview: Anders Björkman Is a Professional Technologist Who Doesn’t Believe in Nukes.
And one early quote is:

Anders Björkman: I am quite good at hydrodynamics and wave forces on ships and how to design the ship structures to suit.
It is more complicated than nuclear physics! Once you make certain logical deductions, you realize that nuclear explosions are impossible.

Really?

Quote from: Shifter on August 27, 2018, 06:27:05 PM

Quote from: Jane on August 27, 2018, 01:06:43 PM

Is your name pronounced Hi-wah or Hee-wah?
For some reason I always read it as the former, but looking at it, that doesn't actually make sense.

Hmm. I have been reading it as 'Hey-wah'.

Please tell us Heiwa, how to pronounce your name? 

His name is Anders Björkman and you can learn more in Shock Interview: Anders Björkman Is a Professional Technologist Who Doesn’t Believe in Nukes.
And one early quote is:

Quote

Anders Björkman: I am quite good at hydrodynamics and wave forces on ships and how to design the ship structures to suit.
It is more complicated than nuclear physics! Once you make certain logical deductions, you realize that nuclear explosions are impossible.

Really?

Don't change the subject. We want to know how to pronounce 'Heiwa'

Quote from: Shifter on August 27, 2018, 06:27:05 PM

Quote from: Jane on August 27, 2018, 01:06:43 PM

Is your name pronounced Hi-wah or Hee-wah?
For some reason I always read it as the former, but looking at it, that doesn't actually make sense.

Hmm. I have been reading it as 'Hey-wah'.

Please tell us Heiwa, how to pronounce your name? 

His name is Anders Björkman and you can learn more in Shock Interview: Anders Björkman Is a Professional Technologist Who Doesn’t Believe in Nukes.
And one early quote is:

Quote

Anders Björkman: I am quite good at hydrodynamics and wave forces on ships and how to design the ship structures to suit.
It is more complicated than nuclear physics! Once you make certain logical deductions, you realize that nuclear explosions are impossible.

Really?

Thanks for the link! The interview is pretty good.

Re pronouncing Heiwa - https://www.thoughtco.com/heiwa-meaning-and-characters-2028489

Don't change the subject. We want to know how to pronounce 'Heiwa'

You asked:

Please tell us Heiwa, how to pronounce your name? 

And I told you his name! Heiwa is the name of company.

Quote from: rabinoz on August 27, 2018, 07:45:05 PM

Quote from: Shifter on August 27, 2018, 06:27:05 PM

Quote from: Jane on August 27, 2018, 01:06:43 PM

Is your name pronounced Hi-wah or Hee-wah?
For some reason I always read it as the former, but looking at it, that doesn't actually make sense.

Hmm. I have been reading it as 'Hey-wah'.

Please tell us Heiwa, how to pronounce your name? 

His name is Anders Björkman and you can learn more in Shock Interview: Anders Björkman Is a Professional Technologist Who Doesn’t Believe in Nukes.
And one early quote is:

Quote

Anders Björkman: I am quite good at hydrodynamics and wave forces on ships and how to design the ship structures to suit.
It is more complicated than nuclear physics! Once you make certain logical deductions, you realize that nuclear explosions are impossible.

Really?

Thanks for the link! The interview is pretty good.

Re pronouncing Heiwa - https://www.thoughtco.com/heiwa-meaning-and-characters-2028489

And "Hydrodynamics and wave forces on ships" are "more complicated than nuclear physics!" is something that could only be said by someone with no real understanding of "nuclear physics" as you've proven so often.

Quote from: Heiwa on August 27, 2018, 08:15:34 PM

Quote from: rabinoz on August 27, 2018, 07:45:05 PM

Quote from: Shifter on August 27, 2018, 06:27:05 PM

Quote from: Jane on August 27, 2018, 01:06:43 PM

Is your name pronounced Hi-wah or Hee-wah?
For some reason I always read it as the former, but looking at it, that doesn't actually make sense.

Hmm. I have been reading it as 'Hey-wah'.

Please tell us Heiwa, how to pronounce your name? 

His name is Anders Björkman and you can learn more in Shock Interview: Anders Björkman Is a Professional Technologist Who Doesn’t Believe in Nukes.
And one early quote is:

Quote

Anders Björkman: I am quite good at hydrodynamics and wave forces on ships and how to design the ship structures to suit.
It is more complicated than nuclear physics! Once you make certain logical deductions, you realize that nuclear explosions are impossible.

Really?

Thanks for the link! The interview is pretty good.

Re pronouncing Heiwa - https://www.thoughtco.com/heiwa-meaning-and-characters-2028489

And "Hydrodynamics and wave forces on ships" are "more complicated than nuclear physics!" is something that could only be said by someone with no real understanding of "nuclear physics" as you've proven so often.

All military I know says nuclear physics are easy: after preparations are done, you push a button, the nuclear missile flies away and ... a little before arriving at the target ... two bits of uranium are suddenly brought in contact ... with a neutron in between ... and the missile explodes ... vaporizing the target ... mission completed! You are a national HERO! Any twerp could do it! Just push a button!
Hydrodynamics and wave forces on ships are not so easy. The wave and hydrodynamic forces on a ship at sea vary all the time and people affected by them get sea sick and ... cannot push any buttons at all ... nor calculate the forces.

All military I know says nuclear physics are easy: after preparations are done, you push a button, the nuclear missile flies away and ... a little before arriving at the target ... two bits of uranium are suddenly brought in contact ... with a neutron in between ... and the missile explodes ... vaporizing the target ... mission completed! You are a national HERO! Any twerp could do it! Just push a button!

That isn't how nuclear physics works.