These things aren't abstract and all of the conspiracy theories about the moon landings have been thoroughly debunked.. I struggle to understand why they seem to be brought up here a LOT....
I agree that the moon landings conspiracy thing is starting to get very tired, and boring. At any rate, I fail to see how bogus moon landing videos would potentially prove a flat earth scenario. There's no correlation whatsoever.
That's like saying because Bugs Bunny doesn't exist in reality, it's also proof that rabbits don't exist on earth.
Because this topic isn't about flat Earth V round Earth. It's about Apollo anomalies and it all CAN eventually, over time, marry up with all of the mainstream scientific theories being questioned.
You find one lie, there will be others. You find otehrs, there will be more...and so on. You know this and so does 99% of round Earth indoctrinates.
That's not a dig, it's simply how it is.
It's quite ironic you choose the word anomalies as, for your first photo at least, the only anomalie is what you think the photo represents. As far as the tyre track photo I think both sides can agree that we could go on about the rover being lowered into position vs the tyre tracks being kicked over indefinately. The only things I would point out are that several photos claiming absence of tyre tracks show tracks in other parts of the photos and an empty rover, suggesting walking in the vicinity of the rover could kick up dust over the tracks. Second, the rover could be and was picked up and moved when required if it was not possible to steer out of a position for whatever reason. Third, if you look at how much dust the rover kicks up at such slow speed and the amount of dust that covered the astronauts then I would say it would be reasonable to assume (and indeed see on various videos of walking on the surface) that kicking up dust over tracks is quite possible. Also as I said along with the last video I posted, you can see the length of time the area in question was being walked on during the repair and, although not directly related to this debate, a nice 360 shot of the area devoid of film crew / equipment etc. Finaly, the fact the fender needed to be repaired was because of the amount of lunar dust on the surface that the wheels kicked up - something that would support the idea that kicking up dust with your boots is far from implausible.
If that buggy did 30 mph, I'd be inclined to agree with you. We are talking about 10 mph, so they tell us. Go and drive your car on the sand or dry soil at 10 mph and see what's kicked up.
Of course, we are on the moon, aren't we in one sixth gravity, so that's the reason, maybe?
The thing is, people need to make their minds up about the speed in which dust is kicked up and the speed it drops, because we have two conflicting stories, dependent on what anomalies get brought to the fore.
These people who perpetrate this kind of stuff, like showing us a paper/cardboard and thin tin foil craft stuck together with christmas parcel sized stick tape, plus cardboard and duct tape mud/dust guard can do this, because they know how gullible the general public are and they cannot resist laughing at the public.
It doesn't matter how ludicrous this stuff gets...people like you gobble it up. It's the truth. It can be so ridiculous in the extreme and you lot would sit there with straight faces and say, " of course it's possible, they're just saving money and space isn't that bad" and blah blah blah.
That's why I don't trust any of you that hang on to this like limpets. Those who refuse to see the absurdity of it all and then go about debunking it all...I would not trust as far as I could throw them.
Those who believe it because they don't know any different or hven't looked into it, I can accept.
If I could only muster 4 or 5 things about it all, then I'd give in and say it was all legitimate. The fact is, there's hundreds of things and experts that cannot understand why and how things worked and what not, yet they're all supposedly debunked by people who simply pass them off as wacko's.