What's making this particular debate so difficult is that you're maintaining that both gravity and inertia (or mass; same thing) do not exist.
I'm maintaining they do not exist because they do not exist. It's easy to simply say mass is gravity and inertia or whatever you want but it means absolutely nothing. It's just a saying that describes anything scientists want it to describe about movement or resistance, when it's all to do with atmospheric pressure and it should be fairly clear to anyone who cares to look at it from that point of view.
If the tables were turned and mainstream science drummed it into peoples heads, correctly that is was atmospheric pressure and I came along and said, " no, no, it's inertia and gravity", I would be asked, " ok then you nut, what is gravity?" to which I reply, " well, I don't actually know what it is, just that it does all this stuff", to which the mainstream masses (after laughing) would say, " what a crazy mixed up nut, making up a force and yet can't explain the force, other than to say it's a force, when we have proved that atmospheric pressure is the reason for things working."
Deny that claim if you want, but you know I'm right.
Until you accept the unequivocal scientific evidence that both phenomena do exist, then we ain't gonna get nowhere... and fast!
I'm not interested in whether you want to get anywhere. That's up to you and you appear stuck to your gravity and inertia and do not even appear remotely interested in questioning it, which as I said, is fair enough.
I will continue to put it forward no matter what comes back, because I know for a FACT that what I'm saying is absolutely correct.
So... can you please define specifically what your model replaces gravity and inertia with? And please bear in mind the the accepted scientific definitions for both do not rely at all on the functions of either density or pressure.
It depends on what the scientific world tell you density is or weight or mass or anything else. Basically I can play with all the names given because ultimately they all end up being a part of the same thing.
They may be told in scientific terms as different but they are basically the same. It's just that the scientific world does not like to play simple games, as it would destroy a lot of the fantasy stuff that's added.
Mass/weight/density when married up with the reality of atmospheric pressure being the reason and cause of everything this earth has and does, are the very same thing.
We weigh ourselves and some people weigh heavier that are taller and smaller and it can be said that any person has more mass or is more dense than the other or it can be said that they weigh more.
It's all basically the same thing.
Oh, I'm well aware this will be jumped on with the usual stuff of, I don't understand physics and science and all the rest and that's fine, because finding out the truth requires ANY person to discard the rubbish and dust themselves down, then start from scratch, (yes, scratch) because the scientific world is not the world you live in and it's laws are not the real laws you live under.
To understand it..a person MUST never be shy of looking into the alternatives and must never be intimidated to the point of just following the larger number because it's less hassle.
You all have a brain and it's inside your own skull, which makes you independent in thought, so use it and question this stuff seriously and come to your OWN conclusions, no matter how much questioning it takes.
Don't just accept things on face value because you think fits and you think everything works because they told you so....use your brain.