« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 20   Go Down

Empirical evidence for moon shrimp

  • 593 Replies
  • 132748 Views
*

gotham

  • 3624
  • +2/-6
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #150 on: January 17, 2011, 01:17:54 PM »
Empirical evidence is obtained by means of direct observation. No?

I do believe I saw that EG provided that evidence?
Logged
*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45161
  • +98/-138
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #151 on: January 17, 2011, 01:26:43 PM »
Quote from: gotham on January 17, 2011, 01:17:54 PM
Empirical evidence is obtained by means of direct observation. No?

I do believe I saw that EG provided that evidence?

Yes, empirical evidence is obtained by direct observation.  However, EG (and anyone else who supports any of the various bioluminescent moon theories) has yet to provide any details of these observations beyond observing the fact that light does indeed come from the moon. 
Logged
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.
*

EnglshGentleman

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 9533
  • +0/-0
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #152 on: January 17, 2011, 01:29:21 PM »
Quote from: markjo on January 17, 2011, 01:26:43 PM
Quote from: gotham on January 17, 2011, 01:17:54 PM
Empirical evidence is obtained by means of direct observation. No?

I do believe I saw that EG provided that evidence?

Yes, empirical evidence is obtained by direct observation.  However, EG (and anyone else who supports any of the various bioluminescent moon theories) has yet to provide any details of these observations beyond observing the fact that light does indeed come from the moon. 

I never made this claim. I was viewing the light produced by the moon-shrimp that inhabit the moon.

Actually, if you think about it, it now makes sense why moon-light is dangerous.

It is most likely the moon-shrimps' way of defending themselves against other creatures that would wish to feast on them during that period of moon time.
Logged
?

General Disarray

  • Official Member
  • 5032
  • +0/-0
  • Magic specialist
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #153 on: January 17, 2011, 03:00:44 PM »
Quote from: EnglshGentleman on January 17, 2011, 01:29:21 PM
Quote from: markjo on January 17, 2011, 01:26:43 PM
Quote from: gotham on January 17, 2011, 01:17:54 PM
Empirical evidence is obtained by means of direct observation. No?

I do believe I saw that EG provided that evidence?

Yes, empirical evidence is obtained by direct observation.  However, EG (and anyone else who supports any of the various bioluminescent moon theories) has yet to provide any details of these observations beyond observing the fact that light does indeed come from the moon. 

I never made this claim. I was viewing the light produced by the moon-shrimp that inhabit the moon.

Actually, if you think about it, it now makes sense why moon-light is dangerous.

It is most likely the moon-shrimps' way of defending themselves against other creatures that would wish to feast on them during that period of moon time.

Please stop derailing this thread.
Logged
Quote from: Thork on April 02, 2012, 01:56:05 AM
You don't want to make an enemy of me. I'm very powerful.
?

Kira-SY

  • 1139
  • +0/-0
  • Ja pierdole!
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #154 on: January 17, 2011, 03:40:25 PM »
EnglshGentleman, your thinking is circular:
- There's light on the moon because there are shrimps. And there are shrimps because there is light.
Logged
Signature under building process, our apologies for the inconveniences
*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45161
  • +98/-138
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #155 on: January 17, 2011, 06:08:58 PM »
Quote from: EnglshGentleman on January 17, 2011, 01:29:21 PM
I never made this claim. I was viewing the light produced by the moon-shrimp that inhabit the moon.

What empirical evidence do you have that the light from the moon comes from moon-shrimp?  How do you know that the light doesn't come from moon-jellyfish fish or bioluminescent trees?
Logged
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.
*

IOA

  • 507
  • +0/-0
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #156 on: January 17, 2011, 07:27:32 PM »
Quote from: Thork on January 16, 2011, 03:59:18 PM
Quote from: IOA on January 16, 2011, 03:47:28 PM
...like I said, the debate no longer has potential relevant to the original post.
So? That isn't how it works here.
My apologies, I see now. Most debates have irrelevant content only a few posts after the OP.
Logged
?

Han_Solo

  • 69
  • +0/-0
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #157 on: January 18, 2011, 11:05:02 AM »
Quote from: Mrs. Peach on January 17, 2011, 11:11:03 AM
Quote from: General Disarray on January 17, 2011, 10:58:56 AM
It is you who is going off-topic, you are not posting empirical evidence of the form of these creatures.

Okay, as you seem to think Han_Solo was on-topic, I will respond to him.  One-celled animals would fall through the barbecue grill unless a very fine filter is used.



There are many types of one-celled organisms you know.
Logged
"To be ignorant of one’s ignorance is the malady of ignorance." - A. A. Alcott

"The spherical model of the earth does have the advantage of having a currently more accurate map than us." - John Davis
*

Beorn

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 6521
  • +1/-0
  • If I can't trust my eyes, what can I trust?
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #158 on: January 18, 2011, 11:16:06 AM »
You would think that Zetetics would know what empirical evidence means=/
Logged
Quote
Only one thing can save our future. Give Thork a BanHammer for Th*rksakes!
?

General Disarray

  • Official Member
  • 5032
  • +0/-0
  • Magic specialist
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #159 on: January 18, 2011, 01:14:25 PM »
Quote from: Beorn on January 18, 2011, 11:16:06 AM
You would think that Zetetics would know what empirical evidence means=/

They probably do. Unfortunately, there are no real zetetics here.
Logged
Quote from: Thork on April 02, 2012, 01:56:05 AM
You don't want to make an enemy of me. I'm very powerful.
*

Supertails

  • 4376
  • +0/-0
  • what do i put here
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #160 on: January 18, 2011, 10:22:55 PM »
Nor, it seems, anybody willing to seriously debate about this.  Just good debaters who choose to act like immature children here.
Logged
Recently listened to:

*

EnglshGentleman

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 9533
  • +0/-0
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #161 on: January 18, 2011, 10:27:48 PM »
This thread has so much empirical evidence for moon shrimp in it, it has reached 9 pages.

There are more than 160 posts about moon shrimp in this thread.
« Last Edit: January 19, 2011, 08:05:38 AM by EnglshGentleman »
Logged
*

Supertails

  • 4376
  • +0/-0
  • what do i put here
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #162 on: January 18, 2011, 10:44:55 PM »
Case in point.
Logged
Recently listened to:

?

General Disarray

  • Official Member
  • 5032
  • +0/-0
  • Magic specialist
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #163 on: January 18, 2011, 10:46:07 PM »
Yet another non-answer from EG, official RE victory!
Logged
Quote from: Thork on April 02, 2012, 01:56:05 AM
You don't want to make an enemy of me. I'm very powerful.
*

Beorn

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 6521
  • +1/-0
  • If I can't trust my eyes, what can I trust?
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #164 on: January 19, 2011, 10:21:17 AM »
Quote from: EnglshGentleman on January 18, 2011, 10:27:48 PM
This thread has so much empirical evidence for moon shrimp in it, it has reached 9 pages.

There are more than 160 posts about moon shrimp in this thread.

Of which half is asking for empirical evidence, and the other half claiming that seeing the moon is empirical evidence of moon shrimp. Oh and one post claiming dreams are also empirical evidence.
Logged
Quote
Only one thing can save our future. Give Thork a BanHammer for Th*rksakes!
?

General Disarray

  • Official Member
  • 5032
  • +0/-0
  • Magic specialist
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #165 on: January 19, 2011, 10:24:32 AM »
Empirical evidence of the form of moon life has yet to be posted in this thread.
Logged
Quote from: Thork on April 02, 2012, 01:56:05 AM
You don't want to make an enemy of me. I'm very powerful.
*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45161
  • +98/-138
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #166 on: January 19, 2011, 11:14:44 AM »
Quote from: EnglshGentleman on January 18, 2011, 10:27:48 PM
This thread has so much empirical evidence for moon shrimp in it, it has reached 9 pages.

There are more than 160 posts about moon shrimp in this thread.

Quote from: markjo on January 17, 2011, 06:08:58 PM
Quote from: EnglshGentleman on January 17, 2011, 01:29:21 PM
I never made this claim. I was viewing the light produced by the moon-shrimp that inhabit the moon.

What empirical evidence do you have that the light from the moon comes from moon-shrimp?  How do you know that the light doesn't come from moon-jellyfish fish or bioluminescent trees?
Logged
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.
?

Thork

Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #167 on: January 19, 2011, 11:22:16 AM »
Logged
*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45161
  • +98/-138
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #168 on: January 19, 2011, 11:24:46 AM »
Logged
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.
*

Supertails

  • 4376
  • +0/-0
  • what do i put here
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #169 on: January 19, 2011, 11:40:50 AM »
There are other glow-in-the-dark creatures and things, Thork.  Not very scientific of you to rule all of those out.  :(
Logged
Recently listened to:

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45161
  • +98/-138
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #170 on: January 19, 2011, 01:22:03 PM »
I wonder if proponents of the "moon shrimp" realize that it could be a slippery slope in the downfall of FET.  One of the frequent arguments of Fe'ers use is that earth is "special" because it's the only place known to have intelligent life.  However, if there are moon shrimp (or some other bioluminescent material), then that means that earth is not unique in having life.  That makes the earth a little less special, doesn't it?  Also, if these moon creatures were able to communicate telepathically with James, then that means that the earth is not unique in having intelligent life.  That would seem to make the earth a lot less special.  So, if the earth isn't as special as FE'ers once claimed, then why should it be special in it's shape?
Logged
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.
?

vhu9644

  • 1011
  • +0/-0
  • Round earth supporter
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #171 on: January 19, 2011, 07:15:44 PM »
also, the earth argument is not really earth is special, becuase we have detected earth-like planets. 
or i can state that frogs are unique to shrimp, as you know becuase they are amphibians that have tadpoles in their life cycle

futhermore, there shouldnt be anymore ways to find moon shrimp than to go on the moon
Logged
people i respect: Ski, Oracle, PizzaPlanet, Wendy
*

IOA

  • 507
  • +0/-0
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #172 on: January 19, 2011, 08:03:38 PM »
While browsing the web for tips on astrophotography, I came across this page:

http://www.rocketroberts.com/astro/flag_on_moon.htm

Basically: There's no way you could possibly make out anything as small as moon shrimp on the moon. You'd need a telescope 805 feet in diameter to even see the U.S. Flag as a dot. Therefore, based on this, there is absolutely no possibility that you could see "moon shrimp", even with an 805 foot telescope. With regular, available technologies? Impossible.

Good luck proving that empirical evidence you all talked about.
« Last Edit: January 19, 2011, 08:06:24 PM by IOA »
Logged
?

General Disarray

  • Official Member
  • 5032
  • +0/-0
  • Magic specialist
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #173 on: January 19, 2011, 10:44:49 PM »
I can't make out the form of a bacterium right in front of my face without the assistance of a microscope, I can't imagine it would be any easier from 3000 miles away.
Logged
Quote from: Thork on April 02, 2012, 01:56:05 AM
You don't want to make an enemy of me. I'm very powerful.
*

IOA

  • 507
  • +0/-0
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #174 on: January 20, 2011, 10:05:40 AM »
Well, just to secure the win/cause the Flat earthers to put forth an argument:


Round Earth WIN!
Logged
*

gotham

  • 3624
  • +2/-6
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #175 on: January 20, 2011, 02:01:48 PM »
Quote from: IOA on January 20, 2011, 10:05:40 AM
Well, just to secure the win/cause the Flat earthers to put forth an argument:


Round Earth WIN!

You enthusiasm is fantastic!  Both sides of the issue have evidence that has to be considered before making the final claim for a win, however.
Logged
?

Part of the Problem

  • 385
  • +0/-0
  • The Liberal
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #176 on: January 20, 2011, 02:07:15 PM »
Quote from: gotham on January 20, 2011, 02:01:48 PM
Quote from: IOA on January 20, 2011, 10:05:40 AM
Well, just to secure the win/cause the Flat earthers to put forth an argument:


Round Earth WIN!

You enthusiasm is fantastic!  Both sides of the issue have evidence that has to be considered before making the final claim for a win, however.

Yes, and after 9 pages the RE'rs are still asking the FE'rs to present theirs.
Logged
Quote from: Tom Bishop on June 06, 2011, 10:26:54 AM
By eliminating all present contradicting possibilities you would arrive at the present truth. It's impossible to arrive at a future truth.
?

Crustinator

  • 7783
  • +0/-0
  • Bamhammer horror!
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #177 on: January 20, 2011, 02:32:00 PM »
Quote from: Supertails on January 18, 2011, 10:22:55 PM
Nor, it seems, anybody willing to seriously debate about this.  Just good debaters who choose to act like immature children here.



You're new here aren't you?
Logged
?

Kira-SY

  • 1139
  • +0/-0
  • Ja pierdole!
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #178 on: January 20, 2011, 02:36:05 PM »
Quote from: gotham on January 20, 2011, 02:01:48 PM
Quote from: IOA on January 20, 2011, 10:05:40 AM
Well, just to secure the win/cause the Flat earthers to put forth an argument:


Round Earth WIN!

You enthusiasm is fantastic!  Both sides of the issue have evidence that has to be considered before making the final claim for a win, however.

FE evidence:
- I dreamt of it, and talked telepathically. (i made a request on this point, it was ignored).
- If there's light, there are shrimps, and viceversa.
- Asian food recipies.

Are you kidding me?
Logged
Signature under building process, our apologies for the inconveniences
*

IOA

  • 507
  • +0/-0
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #179 on: January 20, 2011, 03:27:03 PM »
Quote from: Kira-SY on January 20, 2011, 02:36:05 PM
Quote from: gotham on January 20, 2011, 02:01:48 PM
Quote from: IOA on January 20, 2011, 10:05:40 AM
Well, just to secure the win/cause the Flat earthers to put forth an argument:


Round Earth WIN!

You enthusiasm is fantastic!  Both sides of the issue have evidence that has to be considered before making the final claim for a win, however.

FE evidence:
- I dreamt of it, and talked telepathically. (i made a request on this point, it was ignored).
- If there's light, there are shrimps, and viceversa.
- Asian food recipies.

Are you kidding me?

RE Evidence:
- It is literally impossible to directly observe (and therefore make any empirical observations by sight) any shrimp-like organisms on the moon, completely ruling out the possibility of Flat Earthers obtaining any empirical evidence thereof.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 20   Go Up
« previous next »