« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 20   Go Down

Empirical evidence for moon shrimp

  • 593 Replies
  • 132795 Views
?

Kira-SY

  • 1139
  • +0/-0
  • Ja pierdole!
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #120 on: January 16, 2011, 02:35:35 PM »
It also seems logical that if all the other cellestial bodies are round, Earth is too, and that is not accepted here by the side that you seem to have chosen, FET. I'm just applying the same logic you guys are comfortable with.

2-1

Victory for RET.
Logged
Signature under building process, our apologies for the inconveniences
?

Thork

Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #121 on: January 16, 2011, 02:42:20 PM »
No, as you know, earth is special.

That would be like me saying Earth has life on it. Therefore all other planets must have life.
But as you know only earth and the moon have life. The rest of the planets are lifeless.

Earth does not have to be like the other planets. The Earth is very special. RET believe this too.
But no one believes shrimp are special. They fall to earth just the same as frogs, fish and meat.
Logged
*

IOA

  • 507
  • +0/-0
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #122 on: January 16, 2011, 03:26:09 PM »
I believe this thread ought to be locked. The flat earthers have not supplied empirical evidence of moon shrimp.
Logged
*

PizzaPlanet

  • 12204
  • +0/-2
  • Now available in stereo
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #123 on: January 16, 2011, 03:26:25 PM »
Quote from: Kira-SY on January 16, 2011, 02:35:35 PM
It also seems logical that if all the other cellestial bodies are round
It would seem you have seen all celestial bodies in existence. An astonishing claim, but, unfortunately, not a confirmed one yet.
Logged
hacking your precious forum as we speak 8) 8) 8)
*

IOA

  • 507
  • +0/-0
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #124 on: January 16, 2011, 03:28:11 PM »
Quote from: IOA on January 16, 2011, 03:26:09 PM
I believe this thread ought to be locked. The flat earthers have not supplied empirical evidence of moon shrimp.
Maybe I ought to add that the posters in this thread have gone off-topic, and the debate no longer has potential relevant to the original post.
Logged
?

Thork

Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #125 on: January 16, 2011, 03:37:52 PM »
Quote from: IOA on January 16, 2011, 03:26:09 PM
I believe this thread ought to be locked. The flat earthers have not supplied empirical evidence of moon shrimp.
http://www.raleys.com/www/apps/recipes/recipe.jsp?recipeid=1080613

Have you not been following?
Logged
*

IOA

  • 507
  • +0/-0
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #126 on: January 16, 2011, 03:47:28 PM »
...like I said, the debate no longer has potential relevant to the original post.
Logged
*

EnglshGentleman

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 9533
  • +0/-0
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #127 on: January 16, 2011, 03:55:54 PM »
Quote from: IOA on January 16, 2011, 03:26:09 PM
I believe this thread ought to be locked. The flat earthers have not supplied empirical evidence of moon shrimp.

I suggest you take a walk under the shrimp-light tonight and observe it for yourself.
Logged
?

Thork

Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #128 on: January 16, 2011, 03:59:18 PM »
Quote from: IOA on January 16, 2011, 03:47:28 PM
...like I said, the debate no longer has potential relevant to the original post.

So? That isn't how it works here. You don't get to decide when a debate finishes. The debate stops when it has run its course. Now it is more than a page long, it can deviate off to talk about pebbles or the vena cava or prostitutes or the colour green. It stops when no one has anything to add.
Logged
?

Kira-SY

  • 1139
  • +0/-0
  • Ja pierdole!
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #129 on: January 16, 2011, 03:59:32 PM »
Quote from: PizzaPlanet on January 16, 2011, 03:26:25 PM
Quote from: Kira-SY on January 16, 2011, 02:35:35 PM
It also seems logical that if all the other cellestial bodies are round
It would seem you have seen all celestial bodies in existence. An astonishing claim, but, unfortunately, not a confirmed one yet.

Don't get confused, in another thread, I was supporting the idea that flat bodies could exist in the universe. Your quote of my post is a mention to the FAQ, where it said (when I read it) that even though all the bodies were round, Earth can be flat. It is not a claim of mine, it's an extrapolation of the FET claims, to signify that one event doesn't necessarily explain another one.
(English been kinda clumsy there, me sorry)

So, maybe dogs, frogs, cats, and whales may have rained some day (animals from earth falling back to earth); but that doesn't mean a thing to prove that shrimps from the moon haven fallen to the Earth.

Anyway, still waiting hopefully to see something more meaninful than a recipie!
Logged
Signature under building process, our apologies for the inconveniences
*

PizzaPlanet

  • 12204
  • +0/-2
  • Now available in stereo
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #130 on: January 16, 2011, 04:14:27 PM »
Quote from: Kira-SY on January 16, 2011, 03:59:32 PM
Don't get confused, in another thread, I was supporting the idea that flat bodies could exist in the universe. Your quote of my post is a mention to the FAQ, where it said (when I read it) that even though all the bodies were round, Earth can be flat. It is not a claim of mine, it's an extrapolation of the FET claims, to signify that one event doesn't necessarily explain another one.
Ah, yeah, I had a look and it does indeed seem to make that claim. I think it's the manner of speech at fault there, though, for I don't think many FE'ers claim we know the shape of all celestial bodies.

Quote from: Kira-SY on January 16, 2011, 03:59:32 PM
So, maybe dogs, frogs, cats, and whales may have rained some day (animals from earth falling back to earth); but that doesn't mean a thing to prove that shrimps from the moon haven fallen to the Earth.
It's not proof, no, but it adds up to support.
Logged
hacking your precious forum as we speak 8) 8) 8)
*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45162
  • +98/-138
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #131 on: January 16, 2011, 06:47:44 PM »
Quote from: Thork on January 16, 2011, 01:50:20 PM
Quote from: markjo on January 16, 2011, 12:20:46 PM
What sort of environment do they live in? 
They live on the moon.
So the moon shrimp live in a waterless, near perfect vacuum?  Neat trick.
Logged
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.
?

General Disarray

  • Official Member
  • 5032
  • +0/-0
  • Magic specialist
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #132 on: January 16, 2011, 09:20:55 PM »
I guess we can all agree that no one can present any empirical evidence of the shape of these moon creatures, so most of responses to this thread are pure speculation.
Logged
Quote from: Thork on April 02, 2012, 01:56:05 AM
You don't want to make an enemy of me. I'm very powerful.
*

Supertails

  • 4376
  • +0/-0
  • what do i put here
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #133 on: January 16, 2011, 11:56:07 PM »
And trolling.
Logged
Recently listened to:

?

Kira-SY

  • 1139
  • +0/-0
  • Ja pierdole!
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #134 on: January 17, 2011, 02:06:06 AM »
Quote from: General Disarray on January 16, 2011, 09:20:55 PM
I guess we can all agree that no one can present any empirical evidence of the shape of these moon creatures, so most of responses to this thread are pure speculation.

I really expect James can ask them telepathically if they come here, and how. Given that humans here cannot give a good answer, maybe they can.
Logged
Signature under building process, our apologies for the inconveniences
?

Han_Solo

  • 69
  • +0/-0
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #135 on: January 17, 2011, 09:59:49 AM »
Quote from: PizzaPlanet on January 16, 2011, 09:56:50 AM
Shrimp currently present on the moon can't be eaten by humans, because our arms are not as long as to reach the moon.

But how do you know that it is shrimp in the first place? Duh!
Logged
"To be ignorant of one’s ignorance is the malady of ignorance." - A. A. Alcott

"The spherical model of the earth does have the advantage of having a currently more accurate map than us." - John Davis
?

Han_Solo

  • 69
  • +0/-0
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #136 on: January 17, 2011, 10:01:57 AM »
Quote from: Thork on January 16, 2011, 01:50:20 PM
Well as I have shown you before animals fall from the sky.

Then why hasn't any moon-shrimp fallen in my backyard yet?
Logged
"To be ignorant of one’s ignorance is the malady of ignorance." - A. A. Alcott

"The spherical model of the earth does have the advantage of having a currently more accurate map than us." - John Davis
?

Han_Solo

  • 69
  • +0/-0
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #137 on: January 17, 2011, 10:06:07 AM »
Considering I am an Australian, I am waiting for this moon-shrimp to fall, so I can have a good BBQ with my mates, with the possible new invention of Moon-Beer as well.
Logged
"To be ignorant of one’s ignorance is the malady of ignorance." - A. A. Alcott

"The spherical model of the earth does have the advantage of having a currently more accurate map than us." - John Davis
?

Mrs. Peach

  • Official Member
  • 6229
  • +0/-0
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #138 on: January 17, 2011, 10:20:27 AM »
I think the term 'moon shrimp' is a misnomer.  They are 'shrimp-like,' possibly one-celled and not a good candidate for a barbecue. Although jesting posts are fun, let's stick to the theory and not go off on wild tangents.


Logged
?

Han_Solo

  • 69
  • +0/-0
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #139 on: January 17, 2011, 10:31:39 AM »
Quote from: Mrs. Peach on January 17, 2011, 10:20:27 AM
They are 'shrimp-like,' possibly one-celled and not a good candidate for a barbecue.

Proof?
Logged
"To be ignorant of one’s ignorance is the malady of ignorance." - A. A. Alcott

"The spherical model of the earth does have the advantage of having a currently more accurate map than us." - John Davis
?

Mrs. Peach

  • Official Member
  • 6229
  • +0/-0
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #140 on: January 17, 2011, 10:37:54 AM »
The word 'proof' should be confined to mathemathics.
Logged
?

General Disarray

  • Official Member
  • 5032
  • +0/-0
  • Magic specialist
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #141 on: January 17, 2011, 10:58:56 AM »
It is you who is going off-topic, you are not posting empirical evidence of the form of these creatures.
Logged
Quote from: Thork on April 02, 2012, 01:56:05 AM
You don't want to make an enemy of me. I'm very powerful.
*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45162
  • +98/-138
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #142 on: January 17, 2011, 11:02:57 AM »
Quote from: Mrs. Peach on January 17, 2011, 10:20:27 AM
I think the term 'moon shrimp' is a misnomer.  They are 'shrimp-like,' possibly one-celled and not a good candidate for a barbecue. Although jesting posts are fun, let's stick to the theory and not go off on wild tangents. 

The whole point is that there seems to be no empirical evidence whatsoever suggesting the existence of, let alone the nature of, the "moon shrimp".  Not the least of which being a lunar environment that is compatible with the existence of life.
Logged
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.
*

EnglshGentleman

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 9533
  • +0/-0
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #143 on: January 17, 2011, 11:08:54 AM »
Quote from: General Disarray on January 17, 2011, 10:58:56 AM
It is you who is going off-topic, you are not posting empirical evidence of the form of these creatures.

I have been posting about the empirical evidence this entire thread.
Logged
?

Mrs. Peach

  • Official Member
  • 6229
  • +0/-0
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #144 on: January 17, 2011, 11:11:03 AM »
Quote from: General Disarray on January 17, 2011, 10:58:56 AM
It is you who is going off-topic, you are not posting empirical evidence of the form of these creatures.

Okay, as you seem to think Han_Solo was on-topic, I will respond to him.  One-celled animals would fall through the barbecue grill unless a very fine filter is used.

Logged
*

EnglshGentleman

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 9533
  • +0/-0
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #145 on: January 17, 2011, 11:17:23 AM »
How typical of RE'ers. To only whine about FE'ers posting off topic and never RE'ers.
Logged
?

General Disarray

  • Official Member
  • 5032
  • +0/-0
  • Magic specialist
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #146 on: January 17, 2011, 11:22:24 AM »
To those who think they have addressed the question from the OP, please see www.rif.org and then try again.
Logged
Quote from: Thork on April 02, 2012, 01:56:05 AM
You don't want to make an enemy of me. I'm very powerful.
?

Mrs. Peach

  • Official Member
  • 6229
  • +0/-0
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #147 on: January 17, 2011, 11:35:44 AM »
NASA people put out speculation about micro-biotic hazards that space travelers might experience.  I think they went so far as to put some of their 'astronauts' into quarantine.  No one asked them to provide evidence for this supposed danger.  I think the idea that micro life may exist other than on earth is pretty much mainstream.  Why is James held to a different standard?

Logged
?

iwanttobelieve

  • 5442
  • +0/-0
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #148 on: January 17, 2011, 11:43:23 AM »
i had a dream last night the moon shrimp are going to attack  12-21-2012

please james, speaker to moon shrimp,

please ask if there can be peace between us. 




Say NO to shrimp on the barby! We all can do are part.
Logged
*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45162
  • +98/-138
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #149 on: January 17, 2011, 11:52:57 AM »
Quote from: EnglshGentleman on January 17, 2011, 11:08:54 AM
Quote from: General Disarray on January 17, 2011, 10:58:56 AM
It is you who is going off-topic, you are not posting empirical evidence of the form of these creatures.

I have been posting about the empirical evidence this entire thread.

I'm sorry, but when did you post any empirical evidence pertaining to the nature of the moon's light source?
Logged
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 20   Go Up
« previous next »