Flight Times???

  • 136 Replies
  • 34588 Views
?

trig

  • 2240
  • +0/-0
Re: Flight Times???
« Reply #90 on: June 06, 2010, 07:29:19 PM »
Please do not feed the trolls.

Does anyone really think Parsifal believes this bird idiocy? Or anyone, for that matter, except, maybe, Fred Flintstone?

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36019
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Flight Times???
« Reply #91 on: June 06, 2010, 07:32:25 PM »
Does anyone really think Parsifal believes this bird idiocy? Or anyone, for that matter, except, maybe, Fred Flintstone?

My beliefs are irrelevant to the thread.
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

?

Thevoiceofreason

  • 1792
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Truth specialist
Re: Flight Times???
« Reply #92 on: June 06, 2010, 09:04:48 PM »
uhmm... is it me or has nobody noticed these great new inventions called the speedometer and odometer? If you ever fly on a marginally good international flight, the plane will give information on the speed and distance traveled. and if you don't trust it, you should take your own device on board. Parsifal argument is absurd, we should assume that there has to be a mechanism for increasing the speed (bird nudging and/or magically fast and positioned), for which there not only is an absence of evidence for, but evidence against, whereas he refuses to admit a mechanism for shortening the distance (aka if the earth was not flat). that type of logic rivals troll threads. btw I've already shown that the flat map doesn't work, because it inaccurately predicts the area of Colorado by over 50%

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45173
  • +98/-138
Re: Flight Times???
« Reply #93 on: June 06, 2010, 10:12:01 PM »
Does anyone really think Parsifal believes this bird idiocy? Or anyone, for that matter, except, maybe, Fred Flintstone?

My beliefs are irrelevant to the thread.

Then why would you argue for something that you don't believe?
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

Pongo

  • 6752
  • +1/-0
Re: Flight Times???
« Reply #94 on: June 07, 2010, 02:46:09 AM »
I think it's more likely that birds are pulling the planes. The airline companies have realised they can save fuel by tethering birds to the aircraft while in mid-flight and allowing the pilots to switch off the engines.

This is a very innovative hypothesis.  I would imagine that the species in questions would have to be a mutant-hybrid between a humming bird -- to capitalize on its superior maneuverability -- and a larger bird so that it can make a meaningful impact on the travel times. 

If they breed a strong enough 'nesting desire' in the bird, then they do not even have to tether the birds to the plane.  They just attach very appealing nest components and the birds will latch onto the plane themselves.  All that is left after that is the relatively simple problem of steering the birds.

*

Pseudointellect

  • 376
  • +0/-0
Re: Flight Times???
« Reply #95 on: June 07, 2010, 02:52:58 AM »
Hmmm...there is no evidence for the birds; has anyone seen birds attached to airplanes? Lol...no?...then I claim that a magical bunny is just as likely to be helping planes go faster.

*

Pongo

  • 6752
  • +1/-0
Re: Flight Times???
« Reply #96 on: June 07, 2010, 03:03:31 AM »
Hmmm...there is no evidence for the birds; has anyone seen birds attached to airplanes? Lol...no?...then I claim that a magical bunny is just as likely to be helping planes go faster.

Irrelevant.  Rabbits cannot fly and no studies have ever been produced, at least none that I could find, prove rabbits to be magical.

?

jackofhearts

  • 695
  • +0/-0
Re: Flight Times???
« Reply #97 on: June 07, 2010, 03:04:04 AM »
I feel like this whole bird thing is one of the stupidest things you FE'ers have ever come up with.  You'd be doing yourselves a favor if you just dropped the concept.

Trolling makes me angry.

*

LBtheWise

  • 217
  • +0/-0
  • mmamradaww amfghe
Re: Flight Times???
« Reply #98 on: June 07, 2010, 05:41:35 AM »
Hmmm...there is no evidence for the birds; has anyone seen birds attached to airplanes? Lol...no?...then I claim that a magical bunny is just as likely to be helping planes go faster.

Irrelevant.  Rabbits cannot fly and no studies have ever been produced, at least none that I could find, prove rabbits to be magical.

Birds cannot pull planes. and no studies have ever been produced, at least none that I could find, prove birds to be magical.

Frogger

?

jackofhearts

  • 695
  • +0/-0
Re: Flight Times???
« Reply #99 on: June 07, 2010, 07:09:07 AM »
So, so far, there's no explanation for the phenomena described by the OP?

You must have missed Spanner34.5's post.  It's somewhere on the first page.

First of all: no evidence, proof, or documentation, or records of these 400mph jet-streams.

Second of all: planes would be ripped apart upon exiting/entering these 400mph jet-streams.

Trolling makes me angry.

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36019
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Flight Times???
« Reply #100 on: June 07, 2010, 07:36:10 AM »
uhmm... is it me or has nobody noticed these great new inventions called the speedometer and odometer? If you ever fly on a marginally good international flight, the plane will give information on the speed and distance traveled. and if you don't trust it, you should take your own device on board.

This is a very interesting suggestion. How would "your own device" work? What is there that a passenger on an aircraft can do to measure its ground speed?
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

?

jackofhearts

  • 695
  • +0/-0
Re: Flight Times???
« Reply #101 on: June 07, 2010, 07:38:08 AM »
uhmm... is it me or has nobody noticed these great new inventions called the speedometer and odometer? If you ever fly on a marginally good international flight, the plane will give information on the speed and distance traveled. and if you don't trust it, you should take your own device on board.

This is a very interesting suggestion. How would "your own device" work? What is there that a passenger on an aircraft can do to measure its ground speed?

Are you suggesting that all pilots are part of the Conspiracy and are therefore lying about the distances/speed achieved by the plane?  That'd be ridiculous.

Trolling makes me angry.

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • +1/-1
  • Extra Racist
Re: Flight Times???
« Reply #102 on: June 07, 2010, 07:38:08 AM »
uhmm... is it me or has nobody noticed these great new inventions called the speedometer and odometer? If you ever fly on a marginally good international flight, the plane will give information on the speed and distance traveled. and if you don't trust it, you should take your own device on board.

This is a very interesting suggestion. How would "your own device" work? What is there that a passenger on an aircraft can do to measure its ground speed?
I would suggest looking up GPS.
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

*

LBtheWise

  • 217
  • +0/-0
  • mmamradaww amfghe
Re: Flight Times???
« Reply #103 on: June 07, 2010, 07:39:43 AM »
uhmm... is it me or has nobody noticed these great new inventions called the speedometer and odometer? If you ever fly on a marginally good international flight, the plane will give information on the speed and distance traveled. and if you don't trust it, you should take your own device on board.

This is a very interesting suggestion. How would "your own device" work? What is there that a passenger on an aircraft can do to measure its ground speed?
I would suggest looking up GPS.

they believe GPS lies and is a big sham.

Frogger

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36019
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Flight Times???
« Reply #104 on: June 07, 2010, 07:44:43 AM »
Are you suggesting that all pilots are part of the Conspiracy and are therefore lying about the distances/speed achieved by the plane?  That'd be ridiculous.

What part of my post gave you that idea?
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • +1/-1
  • Extra Racist
Re: Flight Times???
« Reply #105 on: June 07, 2010, 08:20:32 AM »
uhmm... is it me or has nobody noticed these great new inventions called the speedometer and odometer? If you ever fly on a marginally good international flight, the plane will give information on the speed and distance traveled. and if you don't trust it, you should take your own device on board.

This is a very interesting suggestion. How would "your own device" work? What is there that a passenger on an aircraft can do to measure its ground speed?
I would suggest looking up GPS.

they believe GPS lies and is a big sham.

I know, but it will still spit out a ground speed. 
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

*

spanner34.5

  • 4639
  • +0/-0
  • feck arse drink
Re: Flight Times???
« Reply #106 on: June 07, 2010, 08:29:55 AM »
I have flown all over England, some of France. I have never used a GPS.

There is nothing in the standard equipment in a light aircraft to give an indication of groundspeed.

Best guess is to use the aeronautical chart and a stopwatch.
My I.Q. is 85. Or was it 58?

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • +1/-1
  • Extra Racist
Re: Flight Times???
« Reply #107 on: June 07, 2010, 08:32:21 AM »
I have flown all over England, some of France. I have never used a GPS.

There is nothing in the standard equipment in a light aircraft to give an indication of groundspeed.

Best guess is to use the aeronautical chart and a stopwatch.

That's great. A GPS unit can be brought on.
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

*

LBtheWise

  • 217
  • +0/-0
  • mmamradaww amfghe
Re: Flight Times???
« Reply #108 on: June 07, 2010, 08:34:13 AM »
I have flown all over England, some of France. I have never used a GPS.

There is nothing in the standard equipment in a light aircraft to give an indication of groundspeed.

Best guess is to use the aeronautical chart and a stopwatch.


"an E6B flight computer is often used to calculate groundspeed"


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground_speed

Frogger

?

General Disarray

  • Official Member
  • 5032
  • +0/-0
  • Magic specialist
Re: Flight Times???
« Reply #109 on: June 07, 2010, 08:36:17 AM »
I've brought a GPS on a plane several times. My ground speed usually measures somewhere between 500-550 mph at cruising altitudes, but we topped out at 610 mph on one trip.
You don't want to make an enemy of me. I'm very powerful.

*

spanner34.5

  • 4639
  • +0/-0
  • feck arse drink
Re: Flight Times???
« Reply #110 on: June 07, 2010, 09:02:41 AM »
I have flown all over England, some of France. I have never used a GPS.

There is nothing in the standard equipment in a light aircraft to give an indication of groundspeed.

Best guess is to use the aeronautical chart and a stopwatch.

That's great. A GPS unit can be brought on.
Would not do me a great deal of good, I don't know how to use one. As they may be interfered with, by the conspiracy, I have no desire to learn.
My I.Q. is 85. Or was it 58?

*

LBtheWise

  • 217
  • +0/-0
  • mmamradaww amfghe
Re: Flight Times???
« Reply #111 on: June 07, 2010, 09:19:55 AM »
I have flown all over England, some of France. I have never used a GPS.

There is nothing in the standard equipment in a light aircraft to give an indication of groundspeed.

Best guess is to use the aeronautical chart and a stopwatch.


"an E6B flight computer is often used to calculate groundspeed"


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground_speed

Frogger

*

spanner34.5

  • 4639
  • +0/-0
  • feck arse drink
Re: Flight Times???
« Reply #112 on: June 07, 2010, 09:29:43 AM »
I have flown all over England, some of France. I have never used a GPS.

There is nothing in the standard equipment in a light aircraft to give an indication of groundspeed.

Best guess is to use the aeronautical chart and a stopwatch.


"an E6B flight computer is often used to calculate groundspeed"


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground_speed
Nope, I haven't got one of those either.
EDIT
Sorry I do have an equivalent However these are used at the pre-flight planning stage.
« Last Edit: June 07, 2010, 09:32:57 AM by spanner34.5 »
My I.Q. is 85. Or was it 58?

?

Thevoiceofreason

  • 1792
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Truth specialist
Re: Flight Times???
« Reply #113 on: June 07, 2010, 09:32:26 AM »
I have flown all over England, some of France. I have never used a GPS.

There is nothing in the standard equipment in a light aircraft to give an indication of groundspeed.

Best guess is to use the aeronautical chart and a stopwatch.

That's great. A GPS unit can be brought on.
Would not do me a great deal of good, I don't know how to use one. As they may be interfered with, by the conspiracy, I have no desire to learn.

build ur own

*

spanner34.5

  • 4639
  • +0/-0
  • feck arse drink
Re: Flight Times???
« Reply #114 on: June 07, 2010, 09:34:02 AM »
I have flown all over England, some of France. I have never used a GPS.

There is nothing in the standard equipment in a light aircraft to give an indication of groundspeed.

Best guess is to use the aeronautical chart and a stopwatch.

That's great. A GPS unit can be brought on.
Would not do me a great deal of good, I don't know how to use one. As they may be interfered with, by the conspiracy, I have no desire to learn.

build ur own
Why, I can navigate perfectly well without one.
My I.Q. is 85. Or was it 58?

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36019
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Flight Times???
« Reply #115 on: June 07, 2010, 09:44:17 AM »
I have flown all over England, some of France. I have never used a GPS.

There is nothing in the standard equipment in a light aircraft to give an indication of groundspeed.

Best guess is to use the aeronautical chart and a stopwatch.


"an E6B flight computer is often used to calculate groundspeed"


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground_speed

The E6B is simply a slide rule. It does not directly measure anything.
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45173
  • +98/-138
Re: Flight Times???
« Reply #116 on: June 07, 2010, 01:08:58 PM »
I have flown all over England, some of France. I have never used a GPS.

There is nothing in the standard equipment in a light aircraft to give an indication of groundspeed.

Best guess is to use the aeronautical chart and a stopwatch.

That's great. A GPS unit can be brought on.
Would not do me a great deal of good, I don't know how to use one. As they may be interfered with, by the conspiracy, I have no desire to learn.
Just out of curiosity, are you instrument rated?
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

?

jackofhearts

  • 695
  • +0/-0
Re: Flight Times???
« Reply #117 on: June 07, 2010, 05:23:39 PM »
Are you suggesting that all pilots are part of the Conspiracy and are therefore lying about the distances/speed achieved by the plane?  That'd be ridiculous.

What part of my post gave you that idea?

I guess that was a leap, but such wind-speed devices do exist... it's called an anemometer.  Obviously, no passenger could just stick one on the plane, meaning one could only take data from the anemometers used by the pilots.  And since if you read the data given from pilots, you would find they're normal (to RET); no headwinds, speeds over 800mph, etc.  You seemed to imply (IMO) that, because passengers couldn't take measurements themselves, pilots would lie about airspeed to cover up for the fact that fligth times just don't work on a flat Earth.

Trolling makes me angry.

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36019
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Flight Times???
« Reply #118 on: June 07, 2010, 05:26:41 PM »
I guess that was a leap, but such wind-speed devices do exist... it's called an anemometer.  Obviously, no passenger could just stick one on the plane, meaning one could only take data from the anemometers used by the pilots.  And since if you read the data given from pilots, you would find they're normal (to RET); no headwinds, speeds over 800mph, etc.  You seemed to imply (IMO) that, because passengers couldn't take measurements themselves, pilots would lie about airspeed to cover up for the fact that fligth times just don't work on a flat Earth.

An anemometer would measure air speed, not ground speed.
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

?

jackofhearts

  • 695
  • +0/-0
Re: Flight Times???
« Reply #119 on: June 07, 2010, 05:39:00 PM »
I guess that was a leap, but such wind-speed devices do exist... it's called an anemometer.  Obviously, no passenger could just stick one on the plane, meaning one could only take data from the anemometers used by the pilots.  And since if you read the data given from pilots, you would find they're normal (to RET); no headwinds, speeds over 800mph, etc.  You seemed to imply (IMO) that, because passengers couldn't take measurements themselves, pilots would lie about airspeed to cover up for the fact that fligth times just don't work on a flat Earth.

An anemometer would measure air speed, not ground speed.

But it would detect anomalies, such as 400mph jets of air.

Trolling makes me angry.