No, gravity has a bunch of nice equations and laws that work. This just says, undetectable force works perfectly and does this.
I will concede that my theory isn't as well-supported as gravity, but I contend that that's only because it hasn't gotten the centuries of thought put into it that gravity has had the benefit of having.
So this has no affect on anything that isn't affected by the coriolis effect?
I'm confident that once I've developed the theory better I will find other things; I already suspect that the movement of the molten rock beneath the surface is caused by coriolons somehow.
And I meant a map. Every FE proponent has a different map. I can't tell if your solar orbit will work or not.
I guess you've met the first FE proponent that admits that we don't have a viable map, then, though I find it hard to believe.
Come on, I can't even debate anything with what you have given me. At least gravity has everything except an exact cause. It could just be space-time warp.
So what's the mechanism for the warping of spacetime? The only point I was making was that not knowing the mechanism doesn't make a theory unviable.
You have yet to describe how it can spin hurricanes but does not disturb the water,
Please visit
www.rif.orghow particles from the sun can spin the hurricane the way it happens in real life,
Well, it's just what they do.
and how the sun emits these.
It's unknown at present, but I would guess that it radiates them, as a byproduct of the awesome reactions constantly going on in the sun.
What does the sun do that makes it so special? It is just a fusing star, and we know that. We have done fusion experiments.
I'm not in any way implying, here, that the sun is "special", and we've never duplicated the kind of fusion the sun supposedly undergoes in a laboratory experiment. There's still a great deal that's taken for granted about the sun, even if you subscribe to RET.
Why haven't we noticed the mass being given off as these particles?
That would be because they're so small that they're undetectable.
But yea, I need a map. I don't think your solar orbit works with artic and antartic days and nights or time zones.
Ar
ctic and antar
ctic days and nights are still a pretty big unknown in FET. I personally feel that the so-called "sky mirror theory" is the best explanation to be put forward so far. I see no reason why time zones would work any differently than they do in RE.
I need more info.
My theory is still in its infancy, but obviously I will update it as new discoveries are made.
Well I must admit, it's a theory not without imagination, I'll give you kudos for that. Though, by "observational evidence" you mean the coriolis effect?
What other evidence would I mean?
If there was such a thing emitted by the Sun, wouldn't the effect be rather random across the planet, rather than conforming to a set pattern, as it does?
As explained above, the sun is, at all times, very close to the equator.
Also, this also means the Coriolis Effect does not occur at night, I assume?
Sure, the same way solar energy cells stop working at night.
