M-M-M-MONSTER FAIL!

  • 4859 Replies
  • 549534 Views
*

kman

  • 990
  • Pastafarian
Re: M-M-M-MONSTER FAIL!
« Reply #4620 on: June 09, 2015, 03:51:33 PM »
Itchy, please watch the personal attacks,  Remember that our roundly friend has assburgers.

The hypocrisy.
Quote from: Excelsior John
[USA TODAY and NPR] are probaley just a bunch of flippin wite sapremist websites you RASCIST
Quote from: modestman
i don't understand what you are saying=therfore you are liar

?

BJ1234

  • 1931
Re: M-M-M-MONSTER FAIL!
« Reply #4621 on: July 07, 2015, 09:02:15 PM »
That's just my view,  ask a flat earther and they'll be sure to enlighten you.

*

Rayzor

  • 12111
  • Looking for Occam
Re: M-M-M-MONSTER FAIL!
« Reply #4622 on: July 08, 2015, 01:07:05 AM »
That's just my view,  ask a flat earther and they'll be sure to enlighten you.

Hehe..   nice.    I don't even think I was being sarcastic. 
Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.

*

Misero

  • 1261
  • Of course it's flat. It looks that way up close.
Re: M-M-M-MONSTER FAIL!
« Reply #4623 on: July 08, 2015, 01:02:37 PM »
Do mirrors melt when sunlight is reflected off them onto another area?
Mirrors aren't made of ice.

Have you worked out how a sunset could occur under an ice dome yet?
There is no sunset.
I am the worst moderator ever.

Sometimes I wonder: "Why am  I on this site?"
Then I look at threads about clouds not existing and I go back to posting and lurking. Lurk moar.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • The Elder Ones
  • 42535
Re: M-M-M-MONSTER FAIL!
« Reply #4624 on: July 08, 2015, 03:43:14 PM »
Chance of Obama winning the next U.S. Presidential Election: 50% , 1/2
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

Pongo

  • Planar Moderator
  • 6758
Re: M-M-M-MONSTER FAIL!
« Reply #4625 on: July 09, 2015, 05:26:04 AM »
Chance of Obama winning the next U.S. Presidential Election: 50% , 1/2

How was that an epic fail?  Did you read the context it was in?

*

mikeman7918

  • 5431
  • Round Earther
Re: M-M-M-MONSTER FAIL!
« Reply #4626 on: July 09, 2015, 08:29:31 AM »
Chance of Obama winning the next U.S. Presidential Election: 50% , 1/2

How was that an epic fail?  Did you read the context it was in?

A president can only serve a maximum of 2 terms.  Obama is in his second term.
I am having a video war with Jeranism.
See the thread about it here.

*

Pongo

  • Planar Moderator
  • 6758
Re: M-M-M-MONSTER FAIL!
« Reply #4627 on: July 09, 2015, 11:58:40 AM »
Chance of Obama winning the next U.S. Presidential Election: 50% , 1/2

How was that an epic fail?  Did you read the context it was in?

A president can only serve a maximum of 2 terms.  Obama is in his second term.

I am as aware of that now as I was when I wrote it.  I was listing binary states (Obama either wins or doesn't win the next US election) that have extremely poor odds of happening to illustrate that something either happening or not happening is not 50/50 odds.

Unless you guys are trying to say it's impossible that Obama win the next election?  Surely not, it's just extremely unlikely.  Laws would have to change in a very short time and he simply doesn't have the approval rating for something like that.  Yet, it's still possible.  Just, as I've said, extremely unlikely.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • The Elder Ones
  • 42535
Re: M-M-M-MONSTER FAIL!
« Reply #4628 on: July 09, 2015, 12:39:04 PM »
Chance of Obama winning the next U.S. Presidential Election: 50% , 1/2

How was that an epic fail?  Did you read the context it was in?

A president can only serve a maximum of 2 terms.  Obama is in his second term.

I am as aware of that now as I was when I wrote it.  I was listing binary states (Obama either wins or doesn't win the next US election) that have extremely poor odds of happening to illustrate that something either happening or not happening is not 50/50 odds.

Unless you guys are trying to say it's impossible that Obama win the next election?  Surely not, it's just extremely unlikely.  Laws would have to change in a very short time and he simply doesn't have the approval rating for something like that.  Yet, it's still possible.  Just, as I've said, extremely unlikely.
Yes, we are saying that it's impossible for Obama to win the next election because he is forbidden, by the Constitution, from even entering the race.  His chances are exactly zero.  You would have been better off saying that someone like Skip Andrews has a 50-50 chance if winning the next election.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

Pongo

  • Planar Moderator
  • 6758
Re: M-M-M-MONSTER FAIL!
« Reply #4629 on: July 09, 2015, 02:20:30 PM »
Chance of Obama winning the next U.S. Presidential Election: 50% , 1/2

How was that an epic fail?  Did you read the context it was in?

A president can only serve a maximum of 2 terms.  Obama is in his second term.

I am as aware of that now as I was when I wrote it.  I was listing binary states (Obama either wins or doesn't win the next US election) that have extremely poor odds of happening to illustrate that something either happening or not happening is not 50/50 odds.

Unless you guys are trying to say it's impossible that Obama win the next election?  Surely not, it's just extremely unlikely.  Laws would have to change in a very short time and he simply doesn't have the approval rating for something like that.  Yet, it's still possible.  Just, as I've said, extremely unlikely.
Yes, we are saying that it's impossible for Obama to win the next election because he is forbidden, by the Constitution, from even entering the race.  His chances are exactly zero.  You would have been better off saying that someone like Skip Andrews has a 50-50 chance if winning the next election.

It's not zero, it's very small but it's not zero. The constitution has been changed before and someone has won more than 2 U.S. Presidential elections. It's highly unlikely, but clearly it's not impossible.

*

mikeman7918

  • 5431
  • Round Earther
Re: M-M-M-MONSTER FAIL!
« Reply #4630 on: July 09, 2015, 08:49:22 PM »
It's not zero, it's very small but it's not zero. The constitution has been changed before and someone has won more than 2 U.S. Presidential elections. It's highly unlikely, but clearly it's not impossible.

That means it's not 50/50, which is the point of this discussion.
I am having a video war with Jeranism.
See the thread about it here.

*

Rama Set

  • 6877
  • I am also an engineer
Re: M-M-M-MONSTER FAIL!
« Reply #4631 on: July 09, 2015, 09:30:48 PM »
It's not zero, it's very small but it's not zero. The constitution has been changed before and someone has won more than 2 U.S. Presidential elections. It's highly unlikely, but clearly it's not impossible.

That means it's not 50/50, which is the point of this discussion.

Did you read the original thread?  If yes, then what point do you think Pongo was making?  If not, go read the original thread.
Aether is the  characteristic of action or inaction of charged  & noncharged particals.

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • Extra Racist
Re: M-M-M-MONSTER FAIL!
« Reply #4632 on: August 05, 2015, 09:44:24 AM »
...
It seams that your own cultist scientists have already proven that light is created from sound.
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.


*

mikeman7918

  • 5431
  • Round Earther
Re: M-M-M-MONSTER FAIL!
« Reply #4634 on: August 22, 2015, 10:40:22 PM »
Of course rocket engines can't work in a vacuum; again, everyone who can apply Newton 3 correctly knows this...

I have no words...
I am having a video war with Jeranism.
See the thread about it here.

*

Son of Orospu

  • Jura's b*tch and proud of it!
  • Planar Moderator
  • 37834
  • I have artificial intelligence
Re: M-M-M-MONSTER FAIL!
« Reply #4635 on: August 31, 2015, 09:32:13 AM »
Meanwhile, in Gotham City, while conversing in the Flat Earth Society forum, the evil Definitely Not Official says,

If you want to talk seriously

 ;D


*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • Extra Racist
Re: M-M-M-MONSTER FAIL!
« Reply #4636 on: August 31, 2015, 09:57:06 PM »
Pretty much this whole post goes here.
1. Photons do obey the laws of relativity.

Really?  You sure know more than all of the physicists on the planet who only speculate on what photons do.  ::)

2. Objects moving seem to get shorter, not longer.


What does this statement have to do with anything?

3. I believe it is said photons do not "age"

What the F***K?  Who asked if photons age?

4. Warped spacetime is gravitation, so they cannot escape if they are past the event horizon. Everything follows bent spacetime.

lol, warped space-time is one theory for Gravity, not Gravitation.  You really are this dumb, are you not?
The one in bold is my favorite.
« Last Edit: August 31, 2015, 10:07:32 PM by sokarul »
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

Re: M-M-M-MONSTER FAIL!
« Reply #4637 on: October 03, 2015, 05:35:48 AM »
I was not attempting to explain any tenant of the FE.
Founder member of the League Of Scientific Gentlemen and Mademoiselles des Connaissances.
I am pompous, self-righteous, thin skinned, and smug.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • The Elder Ones
  • 42535
Re: M-M-M-MONSTER FAIL!
« Reply #4638 on: October 06, 2015, 08:46:49 PM »
No plane will fly without drag, it needs some resistance to push against.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

?

Papa Legba

  • Ranters
  • 9566
  • Welcome to the CIA Troll/Shill Society.
Re: M-M-M-MONSTER FAIL!
« Reply #4639 on: October 07, 2015, 01:32:53 PM »
Of course rocket engines can't work in a vacuum; again, everyone who can apply Newton 3 correctly knows this...

I have no words...

LOL!!!

No you don't, do you, loser?

No-one who argues that it is possible to Push against Nothing does...
I got Trolled & Shilled at the CIA Troll/Shill Society and now I feel EPIC!!!

Re: M-M-M-MONSTER FAIL!
« Reply #4640 on: October 11, 2015, 04:21:50 AM »
Gravity does not exist as a force, therefore it can in no way impart any motion on a previously static body. 
Founder member of the League Of Scientific Gentlemen and Mademoiselles des Connaissances.
I am pompous, self-righteous, thin skinned, and smug.

*

Son of Orospu

  • Jura's b*tch and proud of it!
  • Planar Moderator
  • 37834
  • I have artificial intelligence
Re: M-M-M-MONSTER FAIL!
« Reply #4641 on: October 11, 2015, 04:49:30 AM »
Perhaps Dino Neil does not understand that many scientists do not believe gravity is a force; they consider it a pseudo force, like the centrifugal force.  In other words, just because we see something happening, and it seems like a force, that does not mean it is a force. 

Re: M-M-M-MONSTER FAIL!
« Reply #4642 on: October 14, 2015, 08:12:23 AM »
How juvenile are you round Earthers? You can't refute a flat Earther's statement, you can't admit you've made a mistake, so you quote and post in here and chortle and act all secure when you've been shredded.

Re: M-M-M-MONSTER FAIL!
« Reply #4643 on: October 17, 2015, 04:44:58 PM »
How juvenile are you round Earthers? You can't refute a flat Earther's statement, you can't admit you've made a mistake, so you quote and post in here and chortle and act all secure when you've been shredded.

Firstly, I'm not a round earther.
Secondly, the bit that was the Monster Fail was the second part of the sentence - that gravity can't impart motion to a body. Whether it's a force or not is utterly irrelevant to what it can and can't do.
Let's see you let go of an apple and watch it hang suspended in mid air, because no motion is imparted to it.  :P
Founder member of the League Of Scientific Gentlemen and Mademoiselles des Connaissances.
I am pompous, self-righteous, thin skinned, and smug.

Re: M-M-M-MONSTER FAIL!
« Reply #4644 on: October 18, 2015, 09:33:55 AM »
How juvenile are you round Earthers? You can't refute a flat Earther's statement, you can't admit you've made a mistake, so you quote and post in here and chortle and act all secure when you've been shredded.

Firstly, I'm not a round earther.
Secondly, the bit that was the Monster Fail was the second part of the sentence - that gravity can't impart motion to a body. Whether it's a force or not is utterly irrelevant to what it can and can't do.
Let's see you let go of an apple and watch it hang suspended in mid air, because no motion is imparted to it.  :P

Never mind, basic reading comprehension seems to be beyond you. Your post makes a good fit in this thread.

*

hoppy

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 11803
Re: M-M-M-MONSTER FAIL!
« Reply #4645 on: October 18, 2015, 12:29:53 PM »
How juvenile are you round Earthers? You can't refute a flat Earther's statement, you can't admit you've made a mistake, so you quote and post in here and chortle and act all secure when you've been shredded.

Firstly, I'm not a round earther.
Secondly, the bit that was the Monster Fail was the second part of the sentence - that gravity can't impart motion to a body. Whether it's a force or not is utterly irrelevant to what it can and can't do.
Let's see you let go of an apple and watch it hang suspended in mid air, because no motion is imparted to it.  :P

Never mind, basic reading comprehension seems to be beyond you. Your post makes a good fit in this thread.
I agree, DN seems pretty dumb.
God is real.                                         
http://www.scribd.com/doc/9665708/Flat-Earth-Bible-02-of-10-The-Flat-Earth

Re: M-M-M-MONSTER FAIL!
« Reply #4646 on: October 19, 2015, 11:05:49 AM »
How juvenile are you round Earthers? You can't refute a flat Earther's statement, you can't admit you've made a mistake, so you quote and post in here and chortle and act all secure when you've been shredded.

Firstly, I'm not a round earther.
Secondly, the bit that was the Monster Fail was the second part of the sentence - that gravity can't impart motion to a body. Whether it's a force or not is utterly irrelevant to what it can and can't do.
Let's see you let go of an apple and watch it hang suspended in mid air, because no motion is imparted to it.  :P

Never mind, basic reading comprehension seems to be beyond you. Your post makes a good fit in this thread.
I can't contribute original thought, I just join in when someone else starts being insulting.

I note that Weisdel is incapable of explaining how I'm wrong. If you really want to humiliate me, do it properly. Put my claim on the rack and roast it, rather than just hurling shit.
Founder member of the League Of Scientific Gentlemen and Mademoiselles des Connaissances.
I am pompous, self-righteous, thin skinned, and smug.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • The Elder Ones
  • 42535
Re: M-M-M-MONSTER FAIL!
« Reply #4647 on: November 06, 2015, 09:24:48 AM »
I don't  understand what the EXTRA means?
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

JRoweSkeptic

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 5407
  • DET Developer
Re: M-M-M-MONSTER FAIL!
« Reply #4648 on: November 15, 2015, 12:17:26 PM »
a single photon can pass through two sluts
http://fet.wikia.com
dualearththeory.proboards.com/
On the sister site if you want to talk.

*

mikeman7918

  • 5431
  • Round Earther
Re: M-M-M-MONSTER FAIL!
« Reply #4649 on: November 15, 2015, 04:31:34 PM »
a single photon can pass through two sluts

Thanks for pointing that out, it's fixed now.
I am having a video war with Jeranism.
See the thread about it here.