M-M-M-MONSTER FAIL!

Quote from: sokarul on September 28, 2018, 06:59:18 AM

Quote from: Son of Orospu on September 28, 2018, 06:57:06 AM

Quote from: sokarul on September 28, 2018, 06:54:53 AM

Quote from: Son of Orospu on September 28, 2018, 06:40:06 AM

Quote from: sokarul on September 19, 2018, 09:00:44 PM

Quote from: markjo on September 19, 2018, 08:15:28 PM

Quote from: sokarul on September 19, 2018, 07:29:00 PM

The light from the sun, including UV, comes from electrons.

?

I have access to an ASI

Easiest way to fake the ISS is to build a real one as documented.

Why on earth do you think the Apollo 17 imagery is a real photograph taken from earth some 45.000 miles away ?

Quote from: Danang on February 07, 2019, 04:09:39 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on February 06, 2019, 09:42:38 PM

It's definitely breathing as far as I'm concerned. It's the entire reason why we have the tides.
The breathing creates the higher and lowers pressures that create the tides.
It makes perfect sense with the ice domed Earth, it really does.

Terrific. In your perspective, what makes the earth 'breathe'?

The central Earth energy (sun) moving up and down as it resonates.
This creates a higher and lower pressure around the inner circle of the cell, moving it up and down as it reflection from that central sun onto the dome reduces or expands the molecules as it hits or passes.

This is why the tides are like they are. They tides are pressurised more and more or less and less with each passing of the sun as it moves round whether high or low on reflection which we see as a change in terms of seeing the moon as the opposite reflection of the reflected sun from the centre onto the dome.

Basically the sun and the moon are one and the same, just like every other light in the sky not man made.
That's why everything follows a set path.

Weight is not in any way a function of acceleration.

Weight is not in any way a function of acceleration.  Weight is simply the attractive force exerted on a mass sitting on the surface of a large mass like a planet or moon.  It is a function only of the mass of the object and of the planet or moon. It is not a function of acceleration.  The measurement of gravity is done using acceleration.  But saying the weight of something is a function of acceleration is like saying the distance between two places is a function the measuring method.

Lonegranger who seems like defending Jane in a way or other

I edited the post in 1:20.03.

Study up.

Quote from: sokarul on February 26, 2019, 07:22:47 PM

I edited the post in 1:20.03.

Study up.

I am impressed with your diligence.

Quote from: peeprz on April 04, 2019, 03:36:29 PM

     Hi, I have made posts on this website before wanting a debate but this is different. I do not want a debate as much as I want some questions answered.

     One of my main questions is, how do the sun and temperatures work on the fe model. Are they connected or do you believe that heat comes from some other force than the sun. The reason I ask this is I don't understand how there could be seasonal differences in temperature change on the fe model while the equator stays roughly the same temperature year-round. Like if the explanation for seasonal differences in temperature change is that the sun moves away from an area in the winter and nearer to an area in the summer how does that equator stay around the same temperature when the sun moved away from it.

     I have been provided with pictures of how the sun is supposed to work but they have not given me a satisfying answer as of yet as it still leaves me with the same questions. Imsorryifthisisadumbquestion

Heat and light come together with both day and sun.

- Most part of light comes from daylight, minority of light comes from sun.
- Most part of heat comes from sun, minority of heat comes from daylight.
- Sun and daylight move independent but there is a prejudice about them as they act together and all light comes from sunlight. This prejudice is caused by sun's being about center of the daylight. In fact, they are independent sources of heat and light.

This is the real model but you can not find a model shows this. Flat models generally agrees both heat and light come with sun. I don't want to talk moar about flat earth models on sun and daylight, because I do not agree rest of flat earth models.

I have mentioned John Davis because he is one of the flat earthers do not think like me about this issue.

Maybe sandokhan or sceptimatic help to explain how flat earth model tells it.

The NIST report(s) never went through what we would call peer review (Much like an FAA crash report doesn't either). But reports based upon NIST findings have.

The entire movie Gravity appears as uncut...

I don’t see much of a difference between this:

Quote from: JackBlack on September 29, 2019, 03:33:16 PM

It remains a pile of refuted garbage.

This is why your derivation amounts to nothing more than pure bovine excrement.

And this:

Quote from: sandokhan on September 06, 2019, 09:54:00 PM

You have not proven that there cannot be other explanations.

Is this supposed to be a joke on your part? By all means, please PROVIDE an explanation; if you cannot, and since you cannot, you must accept the inevitable conclusion: the identity of the third body involved in a solar eclipse cannot be the Moon.

Quote from: markjo on October 16, 2019, 03:56:41 PM

Quote from: totallackey on October 16, 2019, 05:28:32 AM

No one is going to tell me that the mass of rocket fuel remains the same once it is ignited and released from a closed system.

What do you think happens to the mass of the fuel when it's burned?

Again, the fuel, once ignited and burnt, is no longer part of a closed system.

Therefore, mass is not conserved.

Al Qaeda with their toyotas:

I've never seen any such thing as a Euclidean space in real life.

Cut the crap.

The Verlinde paper you quoted is dated 2010.

My quote is from 2019:

The setting/rising Sun in FE vs. RE comes down to explaining the green flash phenomenon.

The green flash can be explained in either of two ways:

RE - Green flashes occur because the earth's atmosphere can cause the light from the Sun to separate out into different colors.

FE - A ray of light DOES NOT split into any component colours.

We can narrow down these choices even more:

RE - constant speed of light

FE - variable speed of light

That is, if the speed of light is variable, then we view the green flash through a prism (the dome).

Let's narrow down the choices further:

A superluminal speed of light means a variable speed of light, and thus we are viewing the green flash phenomenon through the dome.

Thus everything comes down to the SAGNAC EFFECT.

The visible Sun receives its power supply from the Black Sun. Each time it dips below the horizon it receives a fresh supply of laevorotatory subquarks (the green flash phenomenon).

Quote from: sokarul on June 01, 2020, 05:50:06 AM

If ether doesn’t exist no phase shift would be seen.

It seems that you have no idea what you are talking about. Yes, if ether doesn't exist no phase shift would be seen,

I am talking depends on its existance by preaccepting its existance.

Listen, you ape cumshot,

The particular mechanism is unknown but it doesn't mean mass doesn't curve spacetime.

Quote from: sandokhan on May 11, 2020, 09:44:10 AM

The setting/rising Sun in FE vs. RE comes down to explaining the green flash phenomenon.

The green flash can be explained in either of two ways:

RE - Green flashes occur because the earth's atmosphere can cause the light from the Sun to separate out into different colors.

FE - A ray of light DOES NOT split into any component colours.

We can narrow down these choices even more:

RE - constant speed of light

FE - variable speed of light

That is, if the speed of light is variable, then we view the green flash through a prism (the dome).

Let's narrow down the choices further:

A superluminal speed of light means a variable speed of light, and thus we are viewing the green flash phenomenon through the dome.

Thus everything comes down to the SAGNAC EFFECT.

Colors don’t exist.

Which language I could done it also? We are talking about English already.

scepti has given some good advice.