He didn’t use a computer but measured by hand
That is pure BS.
Like I said, if he was just going to measure it, then there is no need at all for all that garbage.
You measure the distance on the map, and then apply the scale (if necessary by measuring a known distance).
Doing that physically, there is no need for any calculation.
The only reason I needed to do a calculation was because I used a digital photo and worked based upon the pixels.
But either way, unless you shrink the entire scale down to make the north tiny, it gets Sydney to Santiago completely wrong.
It is not an accurate map of a flat surface.
he estimated Santiago to be at 33° Latitude
So he estimated that Santiago was 33, and Sydney was 34, and thus further south, yet drew it further north? Sure.
You have some serious intellectually dishonesty problems. Our map is accurate and you can’t stand it! Get’s some help.
Says the one that is completely ignoring arguments that demonstrate that they are completely wrong; the one who repeatedly resorts to lies, even in the very statement that follows a complaint about intellectual dishonesty.
You don't have an accurate map. You have absolutely nothing to support a FE, and absolutely nothing to refute a RE. You are just grasping at whatever straws and throwing whatever BS you can to pretend your flat fantasy works and that the real RE isn't real.
It's in the video I posted a couple pages back. Here is is again. I cannot easily describe it. If you really want to know LEARN ABOUT IT through the video.
A crappy 1.5 hour long video? No thanks.
If it was actually a flat map of a flat Earth, all you would need to do is measure the distance and apply the scale. If you need more complex BS then it isn't a flat map.
Watching a bit, what he is saying is saying is pure BS.
He is claiming that travelling 1 degree east or west will be 60 nautical miles, regardless of where you are.