It makes me laugh how people can believe a combustion chamber in a rocket is going to allow burning rocket fuel to push up and down in equal terms.
Have any of you so called NASA rocket engineers had a look at the combustion chamber in an engine and also the injectors that squirt oxygen and fuel into this chamber?
Think of the so called power they say is created in those engines that is thrown out of the back. Seriously do any of you so called rocket scientists believe a huge so called space rocket can lift off a pad into space without simply blowing up under the pathetic forces they tell us happens to enable the lift of tehse so called monster rockets?
Here's something for you though and I want you to think about this very clearly. Those who have blinkers on and wax in their ears; do not respond.
Those who have a brain, just take heed of what's being said.
A rocket nozzle is shaped like a cone for a reason. The cone widens as it spans out from the rockets arse for a reason. What could that reason be.
1. To allow the burning fuel to mix and expand inside a combustion chamber inside the rocket and simply disperse the burning fuel into the atmosphere as simply waste and doing nothing.
2. To allow the fuel mixture to disperse into the atmosphere to create a controlled burn against the atmosphere to expand it so the rocket gases pushes against that atmosphere as the atmosphere pushes right back in equal measures.
The answer is simple to those who aren't brainwashed.
You see; if rockets worked like NASA tells us then why the need for a nozzle at all?
Also what was the point of having a nozzle in space if it's a vacuum?
What kind of combustion chamber must have been inside the supposed LEM that supposedly landed on the moon?
The so called astroliars were basically sat on top of one engine that was sat on top of another one.
Why did the LEM have a rocket nozzle on landing on the so called moon and yet the ascent kettle, erm rocket thing had no nozzle whatsoever. What's the reason for this?
No resistance, no movement of anything. Kaput. Zilch.
Ever wondered why an aerosol can fizzes when you press the top?
It fizzes because it is compressed inside the can, just like a rocket would hold compressed fuel/oxy.
Open the valve and the fast compressed fuel/oxy/aerosol pushes into the atmosphere at speed which forces the atmosphere away from it, yet the atmosphere equally hits back and tries to equalise the pressure. It friction grips the compressed fuel/oxy/aerosol and you hear the fizz. The SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS.
Now let's put that into your vacuum of space. Open the nozzle and the oxy/fuel/aerosol plays the last man out, stinks game.
Where's the fizz? The SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS?
There isn't one because the compressed oxy/fuel/aerosol is allowed FREE EXPANSION because it has nothing at all to arrest it's free movement into the vacuum.
It's like letting the air out of your tyre in space and then deciding you want to pump it up again. The problem is, your bike pump has nothing to pump. You plunge down the handle into the pump cylinder and there's no resistance because there's no air.
You're not even going to push down the valve in your inner tube to allow air into it because there is no air. So if your valve doesn't move by the force of you pumping that handle down, then how in the hell do you expect a rocket to move in a vacuum by expelling the fuel from it into the same vacuum?
Action/reaction works great inside Earth, due to resistance or atmosphere in ALL cases.
It's worthless in your fictional space because resistance cannot exist.
If only people could understand the principles of a vacuum or a near one and what space is supposed to be and how nothing could work in it, then it would make life easier for people to see just how far the duping has gone.
Throw a ball on Earth and you have a few things in your favour to allow you to throw it.
1. You have the friction of your feet and mass of body against the floor by atmospheric pressure pushing down on you. You can now throw your ball.
2. Dangle you from a rope to throw the ball again and you lose the friction of your feet/legs but your body mass has been transferred to the rope, except now your throw isn't as strong due to less resistance. All you have to enable the throw is the rope and your swing energy and as much push into the atmosphere as your body can muster.
Effective but nowhere near as efective as the feet to the solid ground as a friction grip.
Now take all that away - and as we are told; 'float you in space' with that same ball.
Now throw it.
In your mind right now, you believe you can throw it and you will see it disappear into the endless pit of space, right?
Can't you see that you are rendered still? It's hard to imagine because we are used to friction on Earth. The problem is, you are made to believe that atmosphere is negligent.
I'm going on here and the dipshits will type the usual tl;dr garbage and waste their time. If they do they have to quote me which means the real people get to see what I'm saying many times.
Anyway, back to what we all know. I'll type this is capitals so we don't forget the definite in life. the law that is a must.
FOR EVERY ACTION THERE MUST BE AN EQUAL AND OPPOSITE REACTION.
What does it really mean in the grand scheme of things?
It means: if I or anything uses energy in any action, a reaction of the same energy will be transferred to whatever that energy was used against.
For instance: if I punched someone in the face, my energy would be transferred to the persons body as an action and an equal reactive force from their body would be transferred back to my fist and arm/shoulder/body mass.
Basically I get back what I put in and the same goes for moving in atmosphere. If you walk into it, you compress it and it pushes right back against you with the same reaction to your action.
Confused?
If you are tied to a bungee cord and use all your energy to run as hard as you can by stretching that cord to the max, your energy can stretch it, then that cord will now react against your body with the same energy you placed upon that. It pushes you back.
Now get in your car and imagine you're up against a 100 mph wind. Your car is stationary at this point because your handbrake and tyres are friction gripped to the wheels and road and the mass of your car against atmospheric pressure upon it means you need a lot of energy to move that car into that 100 mph wind.
Once you move that car into that 100 mph wind, you are compressing it more by the mass and energy of your car which pushes harder against that onrushing air onto your car front. But the thing is, just like the bungee rope, the energy has to equalise which it does by being forced around your car and friction gripping it on the sides before smashing into the air behind you that you are moving away from which equalises the pressure only on the energy your car produced, meaning your car is back to fighting the 100 mph wind and not any extra.
Have a good think about that. Some may not grasp it. It requires logical thought.
Now let's take it into so called space.
Let's park your car in space and put you behind it. Now push the car. Does it move?
Ok, kick the car.
Does it move?
Ok, how about pushing yourself away from the car and catapulting yourself away from that car. Yeah?
Can't be done, can it?
Why?
No resistance. You do not possess anything to lever off.
I know what you're thinking. "wait a minute, if I grabbed an open window and gripped it, I could launch myself away from the car."
It sounds plausible doesn't it?
You can be told lots of things...lies. Like; " oh space is a vacuum but things still have mass."
This is a perfect cover story to make you think that something feels heavier than something else and this allows a person or object to be ejected. It should clearly be seen to be bullshit if you're prepared to think.
If I'm holding hands with you in space then drag me towards you. Am I being pulled towards you or are you being pulled towards me?
Or are we simply not doing anything because none of us has anything at all to use as a resistive force. No leverage.
We can move inside Earth because we are under a force of atmospheric pressure. One action results in an equal reaction.
No action can happen without a reaction. You always need a resistive force to enable you to move one muscle of your body.
Atmosphere provides this. Space as this vacuum, does not.
The end result for anything in that so called spacial vacuum is SUSPENDED ANIMATION. No movement in any free way at all, unless a resistance can be used to enable that to happen.
Now just like we couldn't move in this vacuum without using a leverage, neither could Earth. It cannot freely float along. What it can do is expand and contract within itself against that vacuum.
This is why putting a person up higher and higher results in that person expanding and that's not even at a vacuum; just much lower pressure.
This is why we are a sealed unit against a vacuum. A natural sealed prison cell with it's own breathable skin against the vacuum of suspended animation that we simply see as the absence of all light. BLACKNESS with inner reflections.
OOP'S , I went a bit too far near the end, so I'll leave it at that.
It's boring to read but read it and absorb it for those who want to find reality from the sack of crap we've been fed. I'm being totally serious.