Why do you persist in ignoring a multitude of peer-reviewed scientific papers, chock full of data which proves your idiotic point flatly wrong?
Truly, the extent of globularist fanaticism never ceases to amaze me.
You use the word "multitude". I asked you months ago to cite any peer reviewed papers which demonstrate evidence of direct harm to individuals proved to be caused (not merely correlated with) moonlight. So far you have cited only papers about animal bites and violence. Neither of these show any evidence of direct harm from moonlight, merely effects correlated to the phase of the Moon with no evidence that the light levels are relevant.
Furthermore, a multitude, by anyone's definition, is more than two.
When you can show more than two peer reviewed papers, which are less than one hundred years old, and which show definite evidence of harm to people or other mammals specifically
caused by moonlight (NOT merely a correlation with a phase) then perhaps we might begin taking you seriously.
But to be honest, I don't think that's a challenge you are capable of fulfilling. I don't think those papers exist.