I think its important to make a distinction between the system of predatory capitalism we have and capitalism as an idea.
Oh, I sound like a teenage socialist
>Real capitalism has never been tried!
I suppose it has and like any other economic system it succumbs to men's greed and desire for power over others.
I dont think there is a political solution. This is a spiritual question and a spiritual battle.
Real capitalism
has been tried. Probably several times. It doesn't fail because of a flaw, it gets sabotaged by hateful envious bastards.
After people were reduced to crap food and rationed everything "for the war effort," the public finally had enough of this crap. Suddenly, the Hoovervilles and the ghettos and all of that crap are gone, and people live in nice little suburban homes. They have cars to drive. They have disposable income. Then the 1960s happen, and we talk about the peace and love movement called the hippies. What we don't mention is how these are the face of socialist share alike principles, but the body of said movement is shown in the yippies, the social progressive radicals who joined radical movements like Weather Underground, NOW, and Black Panthers. These groups tried to stir people up for violent revolt. And you know what? This led into the slum cities of the 1990s.

Socialism has been tried many times. If it doesn't devolve into communism, it still ruins cities worse than a nuke blast.
You are correct, it is a spiritual battle. I would even daresay is a battle for the dignity of workers, and honoring their labor.
Which honors the labor of a farmer more? To pay them good wages to do good work, and the excess is contributed to exports and charity overseas? Or to pay them crappy wages unless they join a union, and then they have to pay union dues, and have to occasionally burn or destroy their crops because surplus, and be paid to do so because of shitty policies. Nobody likes their work wasted, nobody likes stupid rules that was time or energy, and make people feel like their job is bullshit. Nobody likes to want a regular paycheck and instead be told to stop working because today we're striking.
Our Amazon voted against the unions. And I was glad they did it. Actually, they technically didn't vote. There was an announcement to the effect of "there was a consideration about unions, but we decided it's not part of our company culture, so yea."
https://reason.com/2026/05/01/workers-voted-on-decertifying-unions-1600-times-in-the-past-decade-teamsters-are-the-most-common-target/When you got a job at Lamb Weston, you were subject to the union contract. That's just how it was.
"There's a lot of people that have been there 30, 40 years that are set in their ways and they're union," says Junod. "And I'm like, 'Why are you in the union?' And they're like, 'I don't know.'"
Junod and some of her coworkers began to question that arrangement when they discovered the benefits offered to workers at the nonunion Lamb Weston plant in Twin Falls, a few hours away. Those included more paid sick leave, higher differentials for overnight and weekend shifts, and quarterly bonuses for meeting quotas.
"That's free money, even if it's 20 bucks every quarter," she says. "Why wouldn't I want that?"
Standing in the way: the local Teamsters union.
When workers band together to demand union representation at an Amazon warehouse or at Starbucks, it gets front-page media coverage and provides fodder for think pieces about the class struggle between labor and capital. When the story is workers rising up against a union that has failed to deliver on the promise of better working conditions through solidarity, it tends not to draw as much attention.
But it happens more often than you might think—though the process is not easy, as Junod would learn.
In the Music Man, the main would fondly talk about Gary Indiana (the play is set in 1912). Today? It's voted one of America's most miserable cities. What happened? Same thing that always happens. Unions price the main business out of town, and they decide sweatshops are a better option. Then minorities move into the town which is hollowed out, and crime starts to go up. They call it "white flight" but it has less to do with racism, and more to do with the city being carved out from the inside. Urban sprawl is a vain attempt to refresh a city, but that's like letting a cancer grow when a patient has a heart blackened by cigarette soot. A city needs industry, not just commerce.
Like this?