How can you dismiss all the space footage?

Quote from: bulmabriefs144 on April 04, 2024, 08:46:34 PM

1. Why is the flag flapping in the wind? In no atmosphere, the flag should droop.

The rod that is clearly there above the flag, running its length supporting the flag.  With a mechanical drive to simulate flapping in the wind. 

Do you want me to keep going?

because you took one response to one question and applied it to ALL questions.




life can't be this difficult can it?
holyshit
this is like trying to explain how circles are round to bulma.

He alreasy told you

" its cgi."

a light in the sky doesn't prove the videos aren't CGI.

see the part where you didn't debunk all video is CGI?

The ISS isn’t just a light in the sky is it.

So you have to create a false narrative.

Quote from: Themightykabool on April 04, 2024, 12:23:49 PM

He alreasy told you

" its cgi."

Hmm.  Were you “listening” Themightykabool?

Is that what bulmabriefs144 claimed regarding the Apollo space mission footage and active live broadcasts.

It's just the oscillation of the flag

you can literally see a stick sewn into the top of the flag to hold it out.

and if it were wind generated, the dusty ground would be blowing up dust.

NASA Moon landing: Why did the Apollo 11 flag wave and flap in space?


Highly unlikely, because there is one key factor all lunar conspiracies get wrong and that is the American flag did not really flap or wave on the Moon.

According to the UK National Space Centre in Leicester, the flag’s apparent movements were caused by the astronauts themselves and not wind.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/science/1140849/NASA-Moon-landing-flag-Apollo-11-why-flag-wave-flap-NASA-hoax-conspiracy?int_source=amp_continue_reading&int_medium=amp&int_campaign=continue_reading_button#amp-readmore-target

mmm
nonot butt hurt.

Quote from: Themightykabool on April 04, 2024, 03:15:39 PM

who doesn't listen.

Who’s the one not paying attention to the thread?  You?

Or bulmabriefs144 that makes themselves completely oblivious to the evidence presented by many different people from many different sources, by various means.

it's very simple.
you keep trying to recount history,

Quote from: bulmabriefs144 on April 04, 2024, 11:03:13 AM

Here you go

How about the actual topic of the thread?

How can you dismiss all the space footage?

Which is backed by an actual broadcasting international space station orbiting earth in space you can see with your own unaided eyes.

He alreasy told you

" its cgi."

April 4 - you.
11:47

Immediately followed by
April 4 - me.
12:23



Time stamps are an amazing thing.

Quote from: bulmabriefs144 on March 31, 2024, 06:38:33 PM

You are correct, they didn't risk their lives for a lie. The entire thing was in a set.

Which is a lie by you.

Quote

Apollo 11

The Bochum Observatory director (Professor Heinz Kaminski) was able to provide confirmation of events and data independent of both the Russian and U.S. space agencies.[18]
A compilation of sightings appeared in "Observations of Apollo 11" by Sky and Telescope magazine, November 1969.[19]
At Jodrell Bank Observatory in the UK, the telescope was used to observe the mission, as it was used years previously for Sputnik.[20] At the same time, Jodrell Bank scientists were tracking the uncrewed Soviet spacecraft Luna 15, which was trying to land on the Moon.[21] In July 2009, Jodrell released some recordings they made.[22]
Larry Baysinger,a radio amateur (W4EJA) and a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module.[23] Recordings made by Baysinger share certain characteristics with recordings made at Bochum Observatory by Kaminski, in that both Kaminski's and Baysinger's recordings do not include the Capsule Communicator (CAPCOM) in Houston, Texas, and the associated Quindar tones heard in NASA audio and seen on NASA Apollo 11 transcripts. Kaminski and Baysinger could only hear the transmissions from the Moon, and not transmissions to the Moon from the Earth.[18][24]
The Arcetri Observatory near Florence, Italy, also detected transmissions coming from the mission[25][26] using a 10 meters dish.[27

Quote from: bulmabriefs144 on March 31, 2024, 06:38:33 PM

 Show me the Apollo 11 video, and I will show you multiple shots where it fails the bullshit test.

You can’t analyze yourself out of a paper bag.  You only have lies.  Sounds like a great thread.  You should make one.

Quote

Charming conspiracy theorist confused by reflections



Why the Moon photos could not be fake

Basically there was no way to fake the light of the sun on the moon.  A very far off, very strong single point light source.  And other items.

1. Why is the flag flapping in the wind? In no atmosphere, the flag should droop.

Quote from: Themightykabool on April 05, 2024, 05:21:22 AM

April 4 - you.
11:47

Immediately followed by
April 4 - me.
12:23



Time stamps are an amazing thing.

What’s the time stamps on the posts for the set or stage comments regarding the Apollo discussion in this thread…

Quote from: DataOverFlow2022 on March 31, 2024, 07:42:02 PM

[Irrelevant to context of the two post exhange on april4 and was never in dispute]

Spectacular
Astounding
Amazing

You thinks when i said 'cgi'meant i was reaponding to your future claim about "moon walk" and definitely not to your earlier claim about "live feed"?

Youve got about as much honesty as bulmbes here.

Read it again

Payatrention to the puncutation.
I rarely use it.
But when i do.
I use it.

Read it again

Payatrention to the puncutation.
I rarely use it.
But when i do.
I use it.

Read it again

Payatrention to the puncutation.
I rarely use it.
But when i do.
I use it.

Read it again

Payatrention to the puncutation.
I rarely use it.
But when i do.
I use it.

Quote from: Themightykabool on April 05, 2024, 06:37:54 AM

Read it again

Payatrention to the puncutation.
I rarely use it.
But when i do.
I use it.

Which one.  You post dozens of pointless posts that are just pointless babbling.

Yet you literally posed this..

Quote from: Themightykabool on April 04, 2024, 07:12:31 PM

You thinks when i said 'cgi'meant i was reaponding to your future claim about "moon walk" and definitely not to your earlier claim about "live feed"?

Youve got about as much honesty as bulmbes here.

this one below.
lieterlaly this one
the one where you quoted me so in continuital flux i immediately responded to.
does one post not flow into the next?
how do you converse in IRL?
are you operating out side of linear time?

the rest of us operate on analog.

holyshit it's like FadedMike and Bulma had a baby, then dropped the baby on it's head and named it Data.

But Jesus knew their thoughts, and said to them: “Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation, and every city or house divided against itself will not stand."

[edited so my response makes more sense in flow]

And try to act like the argument is something else.



Asked you a simple question.

What is the first timestamp made in regards to posting about the Apollo missions brought up by others in this thread.

You have established a pattern.  You get asked a simple question.  You ignore it, and incoherently babble with no clear context. 

You have like a 1.5 second clip where it does not move. The clip in context...



You can see rather clearly the flag waving despite itself. This happens in an atmosphere.

Also.

Guys, what are you doing in-fighting? If "Jesus will not help you," you said, but you two are both RE types, and you're quibbling over something I don't fully get.

Quote

But Jesus knew their thoughts, and said to them: “Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation, and every city or house divided against itself will not stand."

If you wish to stand against me (or Jesus), and you cannot agree without fighting, your cause is doomed from the onset.

You have like a 1.5 second clip where it does not move.

You can see rather clearly the flag waving despite itself. This happens in an atmosphere.

 This happens in an atmosphere.

Is there an atmosphere on the Moon?
For a long time scientists thought that there was no atmosphere on the Moon, but recent studies have confirmed that there is one.

The very thin atmosphere, known as an exosphere, contains helium, argon, neon, ammonia, methane and carbon dioxide. It also contains sodium and potassium, which are not usually found as gases in the atmospheres of Earth, Venus or Mars.

Where this atmosphere comes from is still not known. Some theories suggest that the solar winds and high energy particles are stripping material from the surface of the Moon, while others propose that evaporation of surface material might be involved or even meteor impacts. It could also be a combination of all of these effects.

https://www.nhm.ac.uk/discover/factfile-the-moon.html#:~:text=The%20very%20thin%20atmosphere%2C%20known,of%20Earth%2C%20Venus%20or%20Mars.

You think he believes the photos on the moon is where the photos were taken?

Yoy think he believes the wind is from moon atmosphere?




No

He beleives it was done on a stage.
If you were listening...

Quote from: bulmabriefs144 on March 31, 2024, 06:38:33 PM

You are correct, they didn't risk their lives for a lie. The entire thing was in a set.

Which is a lie by you.

Quote

Apollo 11

The Bochum Observatory director (Professor Heinz Kaminski) was able to provide confirmation of events and data independent of both the Russian and U.S. space agencies.[18]
A compilation of sightings appeared in "Observations of Apollo 11" by Sky and Telescope magazine, November 1969.[19]
At Jodrell Bank Observatory in the UK, the telescope was used to observe the mission, as it was used years previously for Sputnik.[20] At the same time, Jodrell Bank scientists were tracking the uncrewed Soviet spacecraft Luna 15, which was trying to land on the Moon.[21] In July 2009, Jodrell released some recordings they made.[22]
Larry Baysinger,a radio amateur (W4EJA) and a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module.[23] Recordings made by Baysinger share certain characteristics with recordings made at Bochum Observatory by Kaminski, in that both Kaminski's and Baysinger's recordings do not include the Capsule Communicator (CAPCOM) in Houston, Texas, and the associated Quindar tones heard in NASA audio and seen on NASA Apollo 11 transcripts. Kaminski and Baysinger could only hear the transmissions from the Moon, and not transmissions to the Moon from the Earth.[18][24]
The Arcetri Observatory near Florence, Italy, also detected transmissions coming from the mission[25][26] using a 10 meters dish.[27

Quote from: bulmabriefs144 on March 31, 2024, 06:38:33 PM

 Show me the Apollo 11 video, and I will show you multiple shots where it fails the bullshit test.

You can’t analyze yourself out of a paper bag.  You only have lies.  Sounds like a great thread.  You should make one.

Quote

Charming conspiracy theorist confused by reflections



Why the Moon photos could not be fake

Basically there was no way to fake the light of the sun on the moon.  A very far off, very strong single point light source.  And other items.