As for letting you use it, try going to a hospital and asking for you personally to use the MRI, see what they say.
Or I just rent a mobile MRI myself with my medical device business, or those working in any related field could rent. I’m pretty sure they don’t care what you do, as long as you have liability insurance and sign for any damage of equipment or misuse of device lawsuits if someone dies or harmed by your rental unit.
Other than liability, which is by far the greatest concern within the medical industry, it’s much like any other business. I’m sure that’s why they’ll allow government agencies to rent them, liability is already taken into account by them.
The point is, we can use and rent our own MRIs, or almost anything else we want to use or rent or buy, all it takes is having the money for it.
It seems like you believe only a select group of people can use highly priced specially made instruments, like an MRI or their expensive telescopes, but only telescopes are not allowed to be used, by anyone of us, even if we offered money, otherwise they’d rent them out to us for money, and operate them for us, and we’d just look through them to see stars or Saturn, and see them closer than ever before, and film them with the best instruments we have.
I’m sure you’d like to see them through our best telescopes, and pay them for it, to operate them, point them to Saturn in clear conditions, magnify on it, and then you could look and film it for half an hour or so non-stop. I don’t know what they would charge you for that, I’m sure it’d be quite expensive. Maybe a few grand or so?
Why wouldn’t they rent them out during off-hours? They’d operate them, or have others operate them, and make tons of money in the process!
Science isn’t about keeping secrets, hiding things from us that they have discovered or seen. Science is about finding the unknown, seeing what has never been seen before, and so forth, but what is far more important than that, is to show and spread and allow the world to see what was never seen before they saw it, show the world what they discovered, explain their findings, repeat tests, allow others to confirm what they saw, they did, what was used, how they used it, etc.
It seems like you have no clue that Astronomy didn’t even exist as a supposed ‘science’ for thousands of years before it was created by the European elites, who ruled the world by that time.
That is, it did not start up naturally, like most sciences did and will do in future.
Astrology began thousands of years before their phony ‘science’ did.
Astrologers were the actual ones who had mapped out the stars, mapped their paths, the ones who identified groups of stars as constellations, noted the shapes of stars in an outline of animals or objects, knew when a unique object called a meteor (which is a unique star too) would pass across the skies, identified certain stars which had unique paths from the other stars, which is why they called them wandering stars, not their so-called ‘planets’ later on, which is total bs.
Stars have never changed, never moved their positions above Earth, look at the constellations now, they have never, will never change at all. Nothing has ever changed or moved elsewhere in position, this was known by astrologers long ago.
All of them move position, I think to ‘recharge energy’ after a long time, and return to the same position again. I think that they fade out in light at the time, and not seen or dimly seen when they move position to charge up again, but who knows?
But I certainly DO know that there’s no way that their fairy tale story holds up at all, saying that all the stars are trillions of miles away from Earth, while every star and the Earth and the rest, are all speeding around through an endless space or universe, in all directions at random, or even all in one exact same direction, having them all be trillions of miles from each other. Their made up magical force can perform many great miracles, but it won’t make this one happen, when they’ve already claimed their magical force is almost nonexistent in ‘space’
So they make up other idiotic excuses for that problem.
All the excuses in the world cannot explain this. The truth explains it perfectly. Stars are all the same, from their creation and were set above the Earth, within the Firmament, below it, as all others were.
Only they move above a fixed Earth, in cycles which always repeat again and again over time.
That’s why all stars are the very same stars, and it does explain this. No bs excuses needed, when it is the truth.
Nobody can possibly make a model of their story here.
Why not tell us about an even greater magical force than ‘gravity’ which they could call ‘superglue force’?
It fits right in with all their other bs, and you’d believe it in an instant!
i.e. you aren't willing to look at the evidence. You have made up your mind, and anyone who shows you otherwise you dismiss as a liar or a fool.
Evidence is based on what, exactly?
Based on being confirmed as true, by others who aren’t claiming to have evidence, for one thing.
As I’ve told you before, those ‘space probes’ you believe are real, you believe ‘space’ is an endless area beyond Earth, are simply things that have no proof of even existing. They tell us they exist, without a shred of proof that they exist. That’s why they always show us films of ‘floating’ astronauts in ‘space’. They made sci-fi movies with the same crap years before NASA did it. That’s not because movie directors somehow were able to perfectly depict how we’d ‘float’ in ‘space’, years before it came to be ‘true’! It’s been planned to look that way all along. They’re all movies, so everything looks the same, or almost so.
They knew that if they could fool everyone into believing that ‘space’ was real, as an endless area beyond the Earth, that nobody could ever know their claims about ‘space’ were all lies.
They told us about certain very special people, within the US military, that were among their best pilots, who they selected to become astronauts, and to fly in rockets up into ‘space’ and even go to the moon, walk on it, and return to Earth safely!
This convinced people that ‘space’ was real, of course.
Yet nobody had any idea it was not proof at all.
Movies aren’t proof of anything. NASA made movies of ‘space’, the only difference is they didn’t tell us they were movies, they said they were real footage from ‘space’
Why would you think that is ‘evidence’, would be their so-called ‘documents’ and others of their same group, as all other countries are in this same group, but it looks like they’re not because they’re in different countries!!
This propaganda was sold as a ‘space race’ between America and the evil Communist empire! We will defeat the evil empire by being the first to land men on the moon, and after it happened, America cheered that they won the space race over the evil empire!
Why would they say the first one that lands men on the moon was the winner of the space race? I don’t remember them saying that, I’ve looked back for quotes on it, but haven’t found anyone saying that.
If anything, the first one that gets into ‘space’ would win a space race, which was the evil empire.
Then only a couple years after Apollo ended, they join up and plan to go into space together, in a joint mission!
That’s like if Hitler and Hirohito met up with Roosevelt and Churchill during WW2 and joined together as friends, tell their military to go back home now, the war is over, we’re all pals now!
Sadly, they actually COULD have done that, if they chose to, because it’s all planned out anyway. The deaths of millions of people were planned out to die, all wars are planned for mass deaths.
They’ve trained us to not think or use our own intelligence that allows our reasoning and common sense to be used.
Most people think ‘space’ is real, an endless area beyond Earth.
Nothing proves it is real, nobody can prove it from Earth, either way, and nothing can ever prove it either way, until we try to launch rockets straight upward in clear skies, and see what happens to them.
Those who already know if space is really true, or not true at all, are the ones with all the rockets, or the ones we’d see from a longer distance above us. Others are little rockets, not easily seen at the height of any barrier that would exist, so they might not be seen at that altitude, or only with instruments, and not much would be seen of them anyway.
They would still work, but not as conclusive proof, which we need here.
And all the bigger rockets are built and controlled by NASA and their cohorts.
There are two of the worlds richest people who are now launching their own rockets, which are not their own rockets at all, they are controlled by NASA, who denies they control their rockets, like they deny every other country launching rockets into space or to the moon are all one same group in on it.
They’ve been really busy piling up their bs story, the past few years, because they’re very worried it is being exposed more and more as a sham, and they’re right about that.
When they have no way to explain why we can see details and movements and colours of stars, which are all unique stars, in various degrees, what do they say?
That it’s all from effects of the atmosphere, and wrong method of using the instruments, or any combination of excuses.
We know it’s nothing but a bs excuse, when we know they have NEVER said stars have looked like this before, due to atmospheric effects.
They didn’t have to say it until now, as a lousy excuse for it.
With space probes, which match their claims, which you dismiss as lies.
You are yet to present anything that contradicts their claims.
Because you choose to remain wilfully ignorant and dismiss anything supporting it as a lie.
Once more, you have no evidence, space has no proof of existing as they claim it to be, that makes every other claim of things being IN space worthless to start with.
I’ve kept telling you there’s no proof rockets fly up into ‘space’, that to prove this, beyond any doubt, is by launching rockets straight upward on clear blue skies, where we would all see what happens to them.
You know we never see them fly up into space, see them fly up until we see a little speck, which goes up further and out of all sight.
Every excuse you make for it doesn’t matter at all, you have no proof of your claim.
Look at that little rocket which they flew straight upward, and hit the firmament, but later revised their video of it to fit the fairy tale story.
They now say it doesn’t hit anything when it stops going up. They say it reaches up into ‘space’ at that time, and show us added on footage of it ‘floating’ in ‘space’! Right, they forgot to leave that part in their first video of it!!! Good one!
No, it is more like saying a ring with groves in it, yet every piece of crap you have provided is not good enough to show if there are groves or not
Can you determine from the video taking through that vastly superior telescope than they had back then, if you would see, or most likely see, at least one or two distinct rings, from what you can see of it here?
Do you think that when we see one large darker area in the orbs middle region, which is very blotchy and appears to be in constant motion, you’ve claimed there is no motion of Saturn at all, it is due to atmospheric effects.
The issue of motion or no motion is not relevant to their claims of seeing 5 distinct belts and their edges, and a feature seen at one position on Saturn.
If they claimed all this was seen by them, they never say it was rarely seen, sometimes seen, other times not seen, or how often it was seen, but they said they saw it for years, to determine its speed of rotation, implies they always saw it, or most of the time anyway.
This rules out the excuse that we’ve not seen Saturn in that video in good seeing conditions as you assume they had all the time for years.
Look closely at that video of Saturn, which shows a large belt around the middle area of the orb, with ever changing edges seen on it, and look at it in each of the frames of the video..,
Looking at the edges we do see, they are very much like the edges we see in most of the OTHER videos also. They also show one large darker belt in the middle like in that video.
This would suggest all of them match up closely because it is only one large belt with ‘wavy’ edges on it, while there is absolutely nothing that indicates there are multiple distinct belts, nor any parallel edges or any specific feature on it.
If you seriously believe that this one large belt with wavy edges that matches up with most other videos, would somehow magically transform into multiple distinct belts with edges on them, or that it’s more likely to show multiple distinct belts than one large belt with wavy edges, you’re in dreamland.
How would the wavy edges turn into one edge on the top belt and the other one become the bottom edge of another belt, is actually the easier question to solve than the rest of it. You have to make at least 3 or 4 belts out of this one large belt, which only would happen with Photoshop editing it, and even that wouldn’t be very easy to do, there’s a lot of belt there that you’d need to take out, just to make it into multiple belts. Then you’d have to sharpen all their edges to make them ‘distinct’ like they claimed to see.
Since the belt changes in every frame or two, you’d have to edit each of the frames in the video, to start with. And then make sure each frame matches up everywhere on it, no easy task that is, among others.
For those who aren’t delusional or living in a fairy tale land, it is blatantly obvious that this one large belt actually does have wavy edges over it, which is further confirmed to be the case from all the other videos which show the same thing too, in various degrees of quality and so on, which would always happen with various videos and various instruments.
But when they all still show the same thing, it’s conclusive evidence of those features are there
So go through every single note about every single astronomical observation, and see if you can find it.
Right, you’d like me to go on another phantom search for things that aren’t there, except in your own mind, hoping they exist somewhere but yet to be found!
Let’s start with NASA referring to their claims as close to their own, which must mean nothing better or closer to their time of rotation has ever been done or found, even if others DID try it later on, but that would look even worse than if nobody tried it again, or just as ridiculous anyway.
When NASA referred to their claims as close to theirs, or said they were close to the actual time, they’re lying to support other liars back then.