In general, I reply to your writing by staying true to its main idea, and I think I have the right to expect the same from you.
You have repeatedly ignored or misrepresented what others have said, even when following your pathetic demands.
So no, you don't have the right to expect people to not split your posts.
They have the right to split your posts, to call out your BS with each point.
And what makes your response even more hypocritical, is that you split his post.
The simple fact is, when you are making multiple separate arguments, it is far easier to split your posts to address each argument separately.
And that is likely the reason why you don't want it split, to try to avoid that refutation.
If you want people to respect your ridiculous demands, you need to show them respect as well, which you refuse to do so.
And complaining about it makes you a cheap troll.
In chess, no one lets you make two moves in a row
This isn't chess. It's more like a RTS, where you can repeatedly attack, and can even carry out multiple attacks at the same time.
For a moment, imagine the talks between the United States and Russia. Without doing this, you cannot understand what is happening in the world.
So indulge in a complete fantasy to pretend your fantasy is real?
Once you understand this reality, you can foresee that after the United States overthrows Maduro, either China or Russia will carry out an action of comparable scale for their own interests.
Again, this requires ignoring the reality that Russia is already trying this, and even China is trying with more minor things.
it is likely that China could use this grievance to legitimize a Taiwan intervention in the eyes of the United States. On the other hand, Russia’s move against Zelensky has also become legitimized.
No, it really doesn't.
They are fundamentally different situations.
Even if they were comparable, the US doing something illegitimate doesn't magically make other illegitimate actions legitimate.
Therefore, if we place the upcoming events in chronological order:
1. Zelensky
Again, if Russia could, they already would have.
They can't, because they aren't powerful enough to do it in a way which wouldn't result in massive retaliation by other powers.
Any questions? (From non-trolls.)
So that rules you out.