Evidence? I just suggest that any spacecraft leaving planet Earth just orbits Earth and nothing else and cannot start orbiting something else.
Your suggestion has been noted and after considerable consideration it has been determined that you don't know what you're talking about.
Topic is the JWSpaceTelescope that is cooling down and shortly will present fantastic photos of the beginning of the dusty Universe where stars are born, etc. The telescope can see through the dust!!
https://www.cosmos.esa.int/documents/401090/1742873/Exploring+the+ISM+Student+Guide/f9b672c6-dee4-b14f-2a56-b82700b9db0f
Top of page 14.
"The particles can be hard or soft and come in many different shapes, but their size is usually less than 1 micron (one thousandth of a millimetre). The wavelength of visible light is much the same size as many dust particles, so it is easily blocked (scattered) by the dust, whereas longer-wavelength infrared radiation passes through unhindered and dust is therefore transparent to it. And in the far-infrared, we see the 'glow' from dust itself."
https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Space_Science/Herschel/More_about_the_infrared
https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/342774/reason-for-using-infrared-for-capturing-cosmic-images
Radio waves can travel from one side of a city to another, even if there's a whole bunch of builidngs in the way simply by diffraction.
Thanks!
Outer space is often imagined to be completely empty, but there is in fact matter between the stars. Asstronomers call this matter the interstellar medium or ISM for short. Dust sounds dirty and not clean.
The ISM is very cold and much less dense than any vacuum created in a laboratory. Imagine that there are many different vacuums in space.
The temperature of the dust is typically 100 K, while the gas can be as cold as 10 K. Because of the low temperature of the ISM in order to observe it directly it is necessary to use telescopes that are able to detect light at wavelengths that are longer than visible light (infrared and radio).
Since part of the light is lost, a star will also look fainter than expected. This phenomenon is known as optical extinction.
So light is lost in the Universe due to dust and gas! That was news to me!
Dust grains only absorb and scatter light whose wavelength is similar to their size; longer or shorter wavelengths are not affected and simply pass through the dust. How gas absorbs light is not clear.
The Milky Way galaxy, where we are in, has a diameter of at least 100 000 light years, and the Sun is actually quite far from the centre, at a distance of about 26 500 light years.
The JWST is just some light minutes away from Earth and Sun and the beginning of the Universe is billions of light years away. I doubt the JWST will see it. It will be lost on the way.
Glad to see you are trying to learn something considering you plagiarized the above, word-for-word, page 5, paragraphs 1 & 2, from:
Exploring the Interstellar Medium
Studying the gas and dust between the stars - Student Guide
You are 95% right. Most of it is complete nonsense. A Universe full of dust and gas at different temperatures and optical extinctions making light disappear, etc. And now the JWST shall take photos of it. And that's all. LOL!
Proof that it’s nonsense.
He has none, neither here or on his site. He's just a cranky old conspiracy theorist who has been kicked out of every forum except this one for his ludicrous egomaniacal nonsense, thinking his opinion is the only one that matters on the planet. I mean he got banned from Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth because even they thought he was an off-his-rocker jackass. No planes on 9/11? That's some psychopath level shit.
Not really. The NY WTC was destroyed from bottom up, while US media broadcasted a movie of Arabs attacking it. LOL. Visit my website about it. My full style is there.
All you have there is a bunch of unsupported claims, with no evidence for them.
The Twin towers were the tallest buildings in the city. There's going to be large numbers of people observing them at any time, Especially after a terrorist attack against one of them is reported.
If the Towers collapsed without planes, there would be videos that support that, there would be videos of of the south tower going from fine to damaged without anything hitting it.
Tens of thousands of people work in each tower, the attacks happened during the work day. There were tens of thousands of people who escaped the tower.
If you want to claim they were prevented from entering, there there absolutely WOULD be evidence of this.