Theory is theory
So you want to throw all kind of scientific thought out the window?
Science does not deal with proofs.
It deals with disproofs and evidence.
It uses observed facts to disprove or support theories.
The observed facts disprove a flat Earth and support a RE.
If you want proof, go to math and don't try talking about the real world.
There is evidence aplenty already listed at the sites you provide
There is not a single shred of evidence of Earth being flat there.
There are numerous ignorant claims and outright lies which in no way indicate that Earth is flat.
claim to be ABLE somehow to explain as to why that evidence could not possibly present as such in an environment you DENY EXISTS to begin with...
You seem to like repeating this nonsense as if it should mean something.
Just because we realise a FE is pure fictional nonsense, that doesn't mean we can't understand how such a world would appear.
I already wrote here in this very thread the sun and the moon DO NOT appear the same size at ALL TIMES as they traverse the sky.
And like so often you run off on a tangent or blatantly misrepresent the problem to pretend it isn't one.
The OP is discussing the lack of change in angular size of the moon/sun during a 24 hour period.
You failed to provide that and instead focused on the variation over the course of a month.
This variation doesn't support your case, it further shows it to be BS.
It shows that traversing over the entire Earth over the course of a day has no significant change in distance while the distance changes significantly throughout a month.
This shows that the moon must be quite far away, significantly more than the size of the Earth, rendering the FE model as pure nonsense.