Do flatties make completely logical and sound arguments?

  • 8 Replies
  • 1853 Views
*

Pizza Planet

  • 201
  • +0/-0
  • Flat Earth is just a theory
Do flatties make completely logical and sound arguments?
« on: December 21, 2017, 04:52:03 AM »
I think not, the arguments flatties spread have no logic implemented whatsoever. There is no rational reason why I should believe in a flat earth, you haven't provided any evidence, only 'theories.' So why do you believe in a flat earth? Where is the inconstancies with the globe earth model? You say it looks flat, but fail to grasp how perspective works. You say NASA lies, but NASA has only been around for less than 100 years, they weren't the first to declare the Earth a sphere. Have you ever actually looked into how they calculated the curvature of the Earth? Have you looked into geodesy? Why distrust the well-established, observable evidence? Why do all the observations made in our entire history lead to the conclusion of a spherical Earth and not a flat earth? Is God playing games, why is it so hard to prove the Earth is flat?
 

*

Pizza Planet

  • 201
  • +0/-0
  • Flat Earth is just a theory
Re: Do flatties make completely logical and sound arguments?
« Reply #1 on: December 22, 2017, 01:08:37 AM »
Where are all the flatties?  :(  :-\  ???

*

Bullwinkle

  • The Elder Ones
  • 21053
  • +2/-1
  • Standard Idiot
Re: Do flatties make completely logical and sound arguments?
« Reply #2 on: December 22, 2017, 01:28:15 AM »
You have been replaced by Marv.

*

Danang

  • 5988
  • +25/-15
  • Everything will be "Phew" in its time :')
Re: Do flatties make completely logical and sound arguments?
« Reply #3 on: December 22, 2017, 02:17:43 AM »
• South Pole Centered FE Map AKA Phew FE Map
• Downwards Universal Deceleration.

Phew's Silicon Valley: https://gwebanget.home.blog/

*

gotham

  • 3624
  • +2/-6
Re: Do flatties make completely logical and sound arguments?
« Reply #4 on: December 22, 2017, 02:53:41 AM »
I think not, the arguments flatties spread have no logic implemented whatsoever. There is no rational reason why I should believe in a flat earth, you haven't provided any evidence, only 'theories.' So why do you believe in a flat earth? Where is the inconstancies with the globe earth model? You say it looks flat, but fail to grasp how perspective works. You say NASA lies, but NASA has only been around for less than 100 years, they weren't the first to declare the Earth a sphere. Have you ever actually looked into how they calculated the curvature of the Earth? Have you looked into geodesy? Why distrust the well-established, observable evidence? Why do all the observations made in our entire history lead to the conclusion of a spherical Earth and not a flat earth? Is God playing games, why is it so hard to prove the Earth is flat?

The FE timeline is much more impressive than that of the RE usurpers. Observe the now most inaccurate statement ever made on the internet.

REers are increasingly grasping at straws and coming up short.   

*

Pizza Planet

  • 201
  • +0/-0
  • Flat Earth is just a theory
Re: Do flatties make completely logical and sound arguments?
« Reply #5 on: December 22, 2017, 03:14:32 AM »
I think not, the arguments flatties spread have no logic implemented whatsoever. There is no rational reason why I should believe in a flat earth, you haven't provided any evidence, only 'theories.' So why do you believe in a flat earth? Where is the inconstancies with the globe earth model? You say it looks flat, but fail to grasp how perspective works. You say NASA lies, but NASA has only been around for less than 100 years, they weren't the first to declare the Earth a sphere. Have you ever actually looked into how they calculated the curvature of the Earth? Have you looked into geodesy? Why distrust the well-established, observable evidence? Why do all the observations made in our entire history lead to the conclusion of a spherical Earth and not a flat earth? Is God playing games, why is it so hard to prove the Earth is flat?

The FE timeline is much more impressive than that of the RE usurpers. Observe the now most inaccurate statement ever made on the internet.

REers are increasingly grasping at straws and coming up short.

I'm sorry, what observations have you made that led you to believe a flat earth other than "it looks flat".

*

Crutchwater

  • 2151
  • +0/-0
  • Stop Indoctrinating me!
Re: Do flatties make completely logical and sound arguments?
« Reply #6 on: December 22, 2017, 03:19:40 AM »
I think not, the arguments flatties spread have no logic implemented whatsoever. There is no rational reason why I should believe in a flat earth, you haven't provided any evidence, only 'theories.' So why do you believe in a flat earth? Where is the inconstancies with the globe earth model? You say it looks flat, but fail to grasp how perspective works. You say NASA lies, but NASA has only been around for less than 100 years, they weren't the first to declare the Earth a sphere. Have you ever actually looked into how they calculated the curvature of the Earth? Have you looked into geodesy? Why distrust the well-established, observable evidence? Why do all the observations made in our entire history lead to the conclusion of a spherical Earth and not a flat earth? Is God playing games, why is it so hard to prove the Earth is flat?

The FE timeline is much more impressive than that of the RE usurpers. Observe the now most inaccurate statement ever made on the internet.

REers are increasingly grasping at straws and coming up short.

Where's your map??

You've had plenty of time. Put up, or shut up!
I will always be Here To Laugh At You.

*

rabinoz

  • 26528
  • +0/-0
  • Real Earth Believer
Re: Do flatties make completely logical and sound arguments?
« Reply #7 on: December 22, 2017, 04:19:34 AM »
The FE timeline is much more impressive than that of the RE usurpers. Observe the now most inaccurate statement ever made on the internet.
Really?
What I see is that until say 300 to 500 BC various civilisations (the Chinese "came around" much later) did believe the earth to be locally flat.
But at least they believed what they actually observed and their "models" did have a real explanation of sunrises and sunsets, etc.
In their cosmology, the celestial objects were commonly on one or more spheres enclosing the earth.

After about 300 BC the belief in a flat earth was not widespread in Western and Middle Eastern civilisations,
                   though there was some opposition to the Globe in "the Church" till around the time is the Venerable Bede.

The early cosmology carried over to Ptolemy's time and much later, in the 13th century to John of Sacrobosco's time.
By that stage, these celestial spheres were thought to be a very great distance from earth.

That early flat earth belief was nothing like the modern flat earth ideas put forward by Samuel Birley Rowbotham with it's close sun, moon, planets and stars circling in a celestial plane above the earth!

This modern, Rowbothian, Flat Earth fails completely in that it cannot even explain such simple things like sunrises, sunsets and the apparent movement of the celestial objects.


So, Gotham, please describe your "FE timeline" that "is much more impressive than that of the RE usurpers".

*

Macarios

  • 2094
  • +1/-0
Re: Do flatties make completely logical and sound arguments?
« Reply #8 on: December 22, 2017, 04:41:50 AM »
I think not, the arguments flatties spread have no logic implemented whatsoever. There is no rational reason why I should believe in a flat earth, you haven't provided any evidence, only 'theories.' So why do you believe in a flat earth? Where is the inconstancies with the globe earth model? You say it looks flat, but fail to grasp how perspective works. You say NASA lies, but NASA has only been around for less than 100 years, they weren't the first to declare the Earth a sphere. Have you ever actually looked into how they calculated the curvature of the Earth? Have you looked into geodesy? Why distrust the well-established, observable evidence? Why do all the observations made in our entire history lead to the conclusion of a spherical Earth and not a flat earth? Is God playing games, why is it so hard to prove the Earth is flat?

The FE timeline is much more impressive than that of the RE usurpers. Observe the now most inaccurate statement ever made on the internet.

REers are increasingly grasping at straws and coming up short.

Wishful thinking.

Earth was measured and proven Globe for over two millennia.

Even Heliocentric system was proven centuries ago.
Hense the name Solar System.
I don't have to fight about anything.
These things are not about me.
When one points facts out, they speak for themselves.
The main goal in all that is simplicity.