Is NASA faking deep space images?

Is NASA faking deep space images?

To be honest, we wish we knew. We know they've faked images of the earth, see Blue Marble on wikipedia, and they have motivation to lie about the nature of the universe for corporate profits. How much of the universe is as presented vs photoshop is a question that NEEDS to be answered.

Don't worry, science will prevail!

I think that they photoshop many of there images.

I guess you have determine what you are willing to believe.  If you don't believe that satellites are in orbit.  You can't believe in the Hubble telescope or it's images. The Hubble Space Telescope is a satellite. Hubble's primary existence is so that we can eliminate the distortion that is created by the earths atmosphere. So in a FE scenario the images have to be fake. Which in my opinion would be tragedy.  The universe and the world is absolutely beautiful beyond our comprehension. We live in an amazing time and can see things that mankind has never even imagined.         

What I meant when I said that they photoshop their images I meant they adjust curves, levels, bring out detail in the nebulae etc.

suseuser, this is the Q&A forum, not the debate forum. If you have a question about FET this is the section of the forum to ask it. If you know the FE answer to a question you may give it.

To be honest, we wish we knew. We know they've faked images of the earth, see Blue Marble on wikipedia, and they have motivation to lie about the nature of the universe for corporate profits. How much of the universe is as presented vs photoshop is a question that NEEDS to be answered.

Don't worry, science will prevail!

If the earth were flat, and NASA agreed, how would that change their function?  How exactly do you feel that saying the earth is round translates into "corporate profits"?

It is amazing how completely disconnected from reality you have to be to support flat earth nonsense.

Naoooowwww. They are all real ! Just use your imagination and finger!

Is NASA faking deep space images?

In a word NO! They are considered fake by conspiracy nutters....People don't trust NASA until they see a big ass asteroid headed this way then all of a sudden hey NASA knows what they are talking about!

To be honest, we wish we knew. We know they've faked images of the earth, see Blue Marble on wikipedia, and they have motivation to lie about the nature of the universe for corporate profits. How much of the universe is as presented vs photoshop is a question that NEEDS to be answered.

Don't worry, science will prevail!

Do you have any evidence they have tried to deceive anyone with fake images?

I think that they photoshop many of there images.

I’m not sure what planet you live on but the majority of professional photographers ‘photoshop’ their images as part of their normal workflow. NASA I’ll bet will use some application to process their own RAW images. The problem is most people like yourself have little clue what’s involved in processing a RAW digital image, otherwise you wouldn’t make such a dumb comment.

Quote from: realNarcberry on December 08, 2017, 09:40:35 AM

To be honest, we wish we knew. We know they've faked images of the earth, see Blue Marble on wikipedia, and they have motivation to lie about the nature of the universe for corporate profits. How much of the universe is as presented vs photoshop is a question that NEEDS to be answered.

Don't worry, science will prevail!

Do you have any evidence they have tried to deceive anyone with fake images?

No. They only have conspiracy theory.

Quote from: is_the_earth_flat on December 08, 2017, 10:11:14 AM

I think that they photoshop many of there images.

I’m not sure what planet you live on but the majority of professional photographers ‘photoshop’ their images as part of their normal workflow. NASA I’ll bet will use some application to process their own RAW images. The problem is most people like yourself have little clue what’s involved in processing a RAW digital image, otherwise you wouldn’t make such a dumb comment.

Agreed...

Is NASA faking deep space images?

Deep space in astronomy is all the nebula, galaxies and clusters. I have a telescope and with the right conditions you can see all those things, but for things that emit less light you can use a camera to take photos and combine them or take an only photo but with the telescope catching the light Of the object, this is called exposition, but this has to be done for many hours. The result will be a fenomelal astrophotography of the deep space.

Short answer: The deep space photos are not fake

Quote from: is_the_earth_flat on December 08, 2017, 10:11:14 AM

I think that they photoshop many of there images.

I’m not sure what planet you live on but the majority of professional photographers ‘photoshop’ their images as part of their normal workflow. NASA I’ll bet will use some application to process their own RAW images. The problem is most people like yourself have little clue what’s involved in processing a RAW digital image, otherwise you wouldn’t make such a dumb comment.

Don't you know how to fucking read.

What I meant when I said that they photoshop their images I meant they adjust curves, levels, bring out detail in the nebulae etc.

suseuser, this is the Q&A forum, not the debate forum. If you have a question about FET this is the section of the forum to ask it. If you know the FE answer to a question you may give it.

I thought I posted this under Flat Earth General.  Did it end up under Q&A?

Don't worry, science will prevail!

This is the ONLY intelligent thing I have read from ANY of your multiple accounts!

Naoooowwww. They are all real ! Just use your imagination and finger!

that's the best you've got?  the suit is pressurized but only to about a third of normal atmospheric pressure.  Of course they can bend their fingers.  It would be quite useless if they couldn't.  The engineers that made the suit aren't as stupid as you seem to think they are.

is_the_earth_flat, i think you are a shill. But not sure whether paid one or repto one.

Anyone who wants to know how the government is able to hide the secret for so long, research reptilian conspiracies and study about social-engineering.
Here's an example of "weak" social-engineering:


Nasa could be photographing micro-objects and giving them out as deep space photos (and that's pretty symbolic, actually!)

is_the_earth_flat, i think you are a shill. But not sure whether paid one or repto one.

Anyone who wants to know how the government is able to hide the secret for so long, research reptilian conspiracies and study about social-engineering.
Here's an example of "weak" social-engineering:


Nasa could be photographing micro-objects and giving them out as deep space photos (and that's pretty symbolic, actually!)

Interesting take...So what evidence do you that reptilians actually exist? Please do not point me to David Icke. And Social-Engineering is not just confined to governments media and private groups also use it....

Space agency are faking just about everything !
The newest generation of fakers has joined the big club....the gall's and girls from fakeX


What now ? defend or ignore this obvious fakery globers and NASA defenders ?

Space agency are faking just about everything !
The newest generation of fakers has joined the big club....the gall's and girls from fakeX


What now ? defend or ignore this obvious fakery globers and NASA defenders ?

Can you sum it up?  In the past you have been unable actually prove any fakery.

...So what evidence do you that reptilians actually exist?

Photographic good enough, Now you'll claim that a 'raptor's not a reptile, but close enough!

Space agency are faking just about everything !
The newest generation of fakers has joined the big club....the gall's and girls from fakeX
<< Space wasting video deleted >>
What now ? defend or ignore this obvious fakery globers and NASA defenders ?

I'm not going to waste time on total NASA and SPACE phobes but you idiotic video claims (at 2:11) that sonic booms do not shake cameras.
Well watch this and learn how ignorant your film producer is!If he's that ignorant, I'm not wasting my time. In any case thousands witnessed the SpaceX launches and landings.

In case you still haven't got the message, NASA and SPACE have nothing to do with the shape of the earth!

That had been settled long, long ago, so dutchy you're wasting your time attacking NASA and all the other 70 or so Space Agencies.

Have fun!

https://cf-b2.streamablevideo.com/video/mp4/whxs5_1.mp4?token=1513578016-qdFXzUrHKKsVdG8IjOsnSfRUTWtpcpzTflmeyDSm5Tg%3D

The best way to identify reptilian agents among humans is not only the morphable serpent eyes, but also the uncontrollable flickering tongue movements! ( it's easy to spot those facial microexpressions, actually..)
...btw, people who are empaths can sense reptilian presense!! I myself can sense them outside on the streets from time to time!

In this video a reptilian agent who plays a role as human with the name Isiah Carey is using good old social-engineering to hide its own instinctual desire to flicker the tongue!
(some people say that reptilians have very strict hierarchy, and backstabbing each other is required in order to protect others from being exposed)
Apply a video filter called "deboss" to this video: it will give you a better understanding that there was no bug after all.

And for general information:

Quote from: Nightsky on December 11, 2017, 03:05:22 PM

Quote from: is_the_earth_flat on December 08, 2017, 10:11:14 AM

I think that they photoshop many of there images.

I’m not sure what planet you live on but the majority of professional photographers ‘photoshop’ their images as part of their normal workflow. NASA I’ll bet will use some application to process their own RAW images. The problem is most people like yourself have little clue what’s involved in processing a RAW digital image, otherwise you wouldn’t make such a dumb comment.

Don't you know how to fucking read.

Quote from: is_the_earth_flat on December 08, 2017, 10:51:28 AM

What I meant when I said that they photoshop their images I meant they adjust curves, levels, bring out detail in the nebulae etc.

Never felt the need for it.