So therefore it is not a constant.
Sure, as its moving it isn't constant.
It is CHANGING position, it can't be constant.
They all accelerate and all acceleration is a change in velocity/speed/mph/km/h/m/s...etc.
There's no constant.
Just like they all move, and velocity is just a change in position, etc.
There's no constant velocity.
That's because there's no such thing as constant acceleration, that's why.
Except all the evidence indicates the opposite.
You are yet to present any rational argument supporting your position while you have been refuted numerous times.
I'm viewing it all in a way that makes sense and not in a way that makes no sense at all.
You might want to learn what sense is; so far your comments have been lacking it.
Acceleration, like velocity, is a rate.
This has direct physical implications.
It is a measure of how quickly your velocity is changing.
Just like velocity is a measure of how quickly your position is changing.
The word CHANGING is the key.
There's no constant.
So you accept velocity can't be constant, as velocity is CHANGING position?
Velocity is one word that describes a change in position.
Velocity is a word that describes a rate of speed in a given direction.
Yes, a rate, i.e. a change per unit time. Just like acceleration is a change per unit time.
I'm going to try and avoid repeating the same think again and again to respond to every time you say the same BS.
What's the matter? Don't you have the ability to actually think for yourself to understand?
The only person showing an inability to think in this thread is you.